sci_photos@troet.cafe
Indlæg
-
We'll see how I feel in the morning, but for now i seem to have convinced myself to actually read that fuckin anthropic paper -
We'll see how I feel in the morning, but for now i seem to have convinced myself to actually read that fuckin anthropic paperYes, that's one important aspect during teaching/learning. @inthehands @jenniferplusplus
-
We'll see how I feel in the morning, but for now i seem to have convinced myself to actually read that fuckin anthropic paper@jenniferplusplus Oh.
I was more thinking of a two week hackathon setting with multiple teams, lots of
, and an evaluation of all different phases like
* planning (choosing right library, based on LLM-“discussions”),
* tests + implementations,
* searching bugs,
* adapting to spontaneous “changes” by the customer,
* readability / maintainability by other teams.But … this …

-
We'll see how I feel in the morning, but for now i seem to have convinced myself to actually read that fuckin anthropic paper@jenniferplusplus I agree; LLM-generated code (above a certain threshold of complexity) is like compiled C code with -O2 turned on. Hard to read, very hard to understand.
Code can get “compressed” quite a lot. -
We'll see how I feel in the morning, but for now i seem to have convinced myself to actually read that fuckin anthropic paper -
I was always upset that my PhD advisor would read printouts of my paper drafts and correct my LaTeX by hand in the margins. -
I was always upset that my PhD advisor would read printouts of my paper drafts and correct my LaTeX by hand in the margins.@vicgrinberg Yes, I feel that; but reading poorly formatted math takes sooo much brain power, too

-
I was always upset that my PhD advisor would read printouts of my paper drafts and correct my LaTeX by hand in the margins.@vicgrinberg Why stopping?

️