@QasimRashid

> States are enacting work requirements

Time to add a new section to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_parasitism_(offense) article.

@clintruin @PeachMcD @distractal @mattsheffield

A sizable chunk of vocal atheists I saw online were young and hurt by religious folks. They _need_ the God to not exist, because to them the God is evil. In a very practical sense.

I, personally, will argue that the strategy of keeping God unknowable implicitly keeps him irrelevant. I don’t care if God exists, but if he does, he has a lot to answer for.

As an aside, do note that most believers fervently deny existence of „wrong” gods.

@PeachMcD @clintruin @distractal @mattsheffield

For crying out loud, why is it so hard for people to understand that faith is entirely optional? Lack of belief in gods is not a belief into absence of gods.

Moreover, [a]gnosticism is entirely orthogonal to [a]theism. Every sane atheist is agnostic by default, because believers insistently push their Gods definitions into the realm of unobservable.

Stop projecting your need for faith onto others.

@mattly So, can we now have a discussion of legal systems that are hellbent on figuring out intent unless they deal with poor people?

Because I’m really tired of rich and powerful getting a pass because “they didn’t intend to ruing y’all’s livelihood”.

@reinouts The country of incorporation is what’s important. It dictates how corporation has to act towards its shareholders.

Nationality of the founders is irrelevant here.

Also, I didn’t say „merging enterprise features”, I said „feature that competes with an enterprise offering”. It is a contribution gatekeeping system driven by US legal precedent.

@reinouts Forgejo development is not held captive by a US company. Good luck merging a feature that competes with an enterprise offering to Gitlab CE.

@newhinton @david_chisnall An analogy popped up into my head reading this:

Ownership implies the ability to pass it on. Code generated without deliberation tends to fail that test.