@mu @remixtures I agree but then call centres are way less effective than face to face but that doesn't stop health providers using them to churn through as many people as possible. We should be realistic about the forces driving AI adoption, they're the same ones as drove Fordism.
S
steviesyerda@mastodon.scot
@steviesyerda@mastodon.scot
Indlæg
-
"A study of physicians in Poland who specialize in endoscopy — the use of flexible probes to examine the inside of the human body — shows how quickly AI tools can erode human abilities. -
"A study of physicians in Poland who specialize in endoscopy — the use of flexible probes to examine the inside of the human body — shows how quickly AI tools can erode human abilities.the whole point of Fordism was to gain control of skilled labour, de-skill it onto an assembly line and thus gain control over the intensity and outputs from production. What was lost were the artisan trade skills. My comment was reflecting a similar change in the article and study. Professionals being de-skilled, potentially higher productivity using technology, but possibly a loss of quality replaced by a gain of quantity in assessments.
-
"A study of physicians in Poland who specialize in endoscopy — the use of flexible probes to examine the inside of the human body — shows how quickly AI tools can erode human abilities."are Henry Ford's assembly lines de-skilling coach builders?"
same energy and despite my huge reservations about the current private ownership and direction of AI I'm feeling that lots of AI scepticism is missing the point. It's private ownership and capitalism that are the threats as usual, not technology.