@steve @mcc this thread inspired me to rename my tool shed into "the library of mostly useful things".

Probably should add "unsorted" to the name.

@nixCraft it has always been about consistency and simple architecture with the least amount of dependencies. The fewest lines of logic staying within the guardrails of the architecture to achieve the goal.

Changing the architecture should be a big deal with a lot of thought put into it.

The LLMs have no memory and no consistency. They start new with every request. Every output can introduce a new architecture or add new dependencies in form of frameworks or libraries.

... Unmaintainable

@eniko can we also get mobile operating systems that get more optimized and less resource hungry with every update so that devices can run for 10+ years before becoming obsolete?

@JetSetIlly @jonny damn.

@jonny this whole thing is so bad that the only viable way seems to fork it before the LLM sloppening. It is a shame to see more and more foundational projects fall into the LLM trap.

And as always you hit the nail on the head with your deep dive and explanations. I love reading them.

I will use your observation on how for a LLM what is written is the same as what is happening.