@malte

If we look at the etymology of the word according to Etymonline, it sais that the words comes from to frighten.

https://www.etymonline.com/word/terror

If I'm understanding you rightfully, you disagree with this etymological light.

But let's go with it. This isn't good either, because you frame yourself as somebody to be opposed - the other. It even waters the rage of bootlickers.

Frame yourself as warriors of mankind and samlife. Use symbolism that blossoms this connection.

@malte I guess Luigi could claim the word terrorist, but an action that targets property? Are you trying to frighten the machinery? Are you trying to frighten the building? I think not.

You are simply doing deeds that neutralizes their activities and disincentivizes such activities. Maybe the investors gains a heartattack, but it could hardly be called terrorism.

@malte That is not going to work.

To identify as somebody who frightens others, whether that be frightening might or folks, it doesnt matter, because to frighten is generally viewed as a bad thing.

If I were you, Id pick a word that inbosoms your direct deeds against folkslaughtering overgrippers. Id weight how you are trying to unpillar their upholding of the zionist walldom. Here we can inbosom unpillar. Thus you could become a pillarpusher. This could gleed folks into nosiness.

@malte Spark kjem frå det å laga bål, så kanskje noko som peiker til det same biletet?

> glød glede
> gnistra glede
> fyr opp gleden
>