I dunno, man.
-
It bothers me that, on a close reading, this handout has trouble distinguishing who it thinks “they” are – the Greens or their low dishonest opponents.
@adamgreenfield They are confused. Whoever they are.
-
I dunno, man. Those “smears” sound pretty good to me – better in most cases than the actual policy.
I can imagine the kind of thinking that led to this poster…the kind of folks that spend meeting after meeting talking about their ‘theory of change’, rather than taking bold action.
I get that the Greens don’t want to frighten the horses (otherwise known as lining up to be target practice for the Daily Mail) but at the same time the assumption that their detractors are going to bother to take the time to even read the poster is sadly for the birds.
-
I dunno, man. Those “smears” sound pretty good to me – better in most cases than the actual policy.
@adamgreenfield would vote and strike for those smears
-
I dunno, man. Those “smears” sound pretty good to me – better in most cases than the actual policy.
@adamgreenfield
Unfortunately it's about the Default Ideology
of neoliberallism.The “Smears” are a perfectly rational and documented position, but the perceived societal costs of going to those positions is astronomical. Breaking traditions, leisure, feeling of security, food, etc. and combinations of those.
And changing opinions on those is equally hard.
Thus in the current societal climate opinions need to be changed very precisely.
(This toot is »
-
@adamgreenfield
Unfortunately it's about the Default Ideology of neoliberallism.The “Smears” are a perfectly rational and documented position, but the perceived societal costs of going to those positions is astronomical. Breaking traditions, leisure, feeling of security, food, etc. and combinations of those.
And changing opinions on those is equally hard.
Thus in the current societal climate opinions need to be changed very precisely.
(This toot is »
» sponsored by the holding cell for my internal accelerationist.)
-
I dunno, man. Those “smears” sound pretty good to me – better in most cases than the actual policy.
I'm failing to see anything wrong with these smears.
️ -
I dunno, man. Those “smears” sound pretty good to me – better in most cases than the actual policy.
@adamgreenfield if ending meat and daily from tortured and murdered animals is not an objective, it is not green enough. Just more conservatives sabotaging once again a party that could be an option
-
I dunno, man. Those “smears” sound pretty good to me – better in most cases than the actual policy.
@adamgreenfield Man the smears sound great to me as well, but we gotta compromise with the normies or we will get flattened by the fascists.
-
I dunno, man. Those “smears” sound pretty good to me – better in most cases than the actual policy.
@adamgreenfield I'll take all the red stuff pls.
-
I dunno, man. Those “smears” sound pretty good to me – better in most cases than the actual policy.
@adamgreenfield I’m reminded of this (fake) Daily Mail front page.
-
I dunno, man. Those “smears” sound pretty good to me – better in most cases than the actual policy.
@adamgreenfield wish the Australian #greens had this kind of grasp on communication.
#auspol -
M malte@radikal.social shared this topic
