Mastodon still has a major profile deficiency among social media users (particularly those on X).
-
Mastodon still has a major profile deficiency among social media users (particularly those on X).
For many of us this might not be seen as disadvantageous (who wants people still on X to come here?), but Mastodon's absence remains notable.
The Q.is: is this because people are unaware of the fediverse or is to part of a deliberate (perhaps implicit) move to obscure a non-commercial alternative?
Or perhaps Mastodon & its values is always going to be niche social media?
I've asked my local council, and several other organisations, to join Mastodon when the list of ways to get updates from them is just all the ones I deleted.
Exclusionary politics.
-
Mastodon still has a major profile deficiency among social media users (particularly those on X).
For many of us this might not be seen as disadvantageous (who wants people still on X to come here?), but Mastodon's absence remains notable.
The Q.is: is this because people are unaware of the fediverse or is to part of a deliberate (perhaps implicit) move to obscure a non-commercial alternative?
Or perhaps Mastodon & its values is always going to be niche social media?
@ChrisMayLA6 The fediverse as is couldn't become a big deal, too many things keeping it from expanding in that way. Even if it was to happen there'd be enough smaller enclaves to keep an independent energy, it's patently non-commercial in the direction of anti-capitalist and more anarchist in nature than the regular models of social media. Saying that though there are two fediverses out there, this one and the very right-wing one so if we're limiting it to purely Mastodon only then I think in either case it'll be self-selecting by pushing out the middle as both are pretty polarised.
-
Mastodon still has a major profile deficiency among social media users (particularly those on X).
For many of us this might not be seen as disadvantageous (who wants people still on X to come here?), but Mastodon's absence remains notable.
The Q.is: is this because people are unaware of the fediverse or is to part of a deliberate (perhaps implicit) move to obscure a non-commercial alternative?
Or perhaps Mastodon & its values is always going to be niche social media?
@ChrisMayLA6 this is why I try and say the Fediverse on mainstream media to try and get the word out. Except even some people in tech have thought I was referring to some fetish dating site which was awkward. But yeah, I thought Mastadon was just some average nerdy version of the same thing until I find out about the Fediverse.
-
@kauer @ChrisMayLA6 I was surprised to find that I have still got an unused Twitter account featuring the Mastodon handle and so far it seems to have survived.
Probably because I am too small to be of interest -
@kauer @ChrisMayLA6 My X profile is literally 0 posts with the title 'moved to mastodon' and it has survived.. but basically nobody would ever have noticed it.
-
Mastodon still has a major profile deficiency among social media users (particularly those on X).
For many of us this might not be seen as disadvantageous (who wants people still on X to come here?), but Mastodon's absence remains notable.
The Q.is: is this because people are unaware of the fediverse or is to part of a deliberate (perhaps implicit) move to obscure a non-commercial alternative?
Or perhaps Mastodon & its values is always going to be niche social media?
@ChrisMayLA6 Most people probably haven't even heard of Mastodon, just like they've not heard of Linux or free software generally. Being free (no cost) means little or no marketing outside the Fedi/FOSS bubble. Growth via personal recommendations is always going to be slow.
-
@kauer @ChrisMayLA6
I'm amazed folk on the fediverse are on X -
@ChrisMayLA6 The fediverse as is couldn't become a big deal, too many things keeping it from expanding in that way. Even if it was to happen there'd be enough smaller enclaves to keep an independent energy, it's patently non-commercial in the direction of anti-capitalist and more anarchist in nature than the regular models of social media. Saying that though there are two fediverses out there, this one and the very right-wing one so if we're limiting it to purely Mastodon only then I think in either case it'll be self-selecting by pushing out the middle as both are pretty polarised.
Yes, I'm only vaguely aware of that other wing.... which is both comfortable but also concerning
-
Mastodon still has a major profile deficiency among social media users (particularly those on X).
For many of us this might not be seen as disadvantageous (who wants people still on X to come here?), but Mastodon's absence remains notable.
The Q.is: is this because people are unaware of the fediverse or is to part of a deliberate (perhaps implicit) move to obscure a non-commercial alternative?
Or perhaps Mastodon & its values is always going to be niche social media?
@ChrisMayLA6 I guess, many have a problem with decentralized social media. Maybe it still isn't easy enough to find the right place. And then, media in general isn't eager to add a
link to their pages and join the fediverse with their own accouts or even instances. Perhaps more advertising for the wonderful 
would help? -
Mastodon still has a major profile deficiency among social media users (particularly those on X).
For many of us this might not be seen as disadvantageous (who wants people still on X to come here?), but Mastodon's absence remains notable.
The Q.is: is this because people are unaware of the fediverse or is to part of a deliberate (perhaps implicit) move to obscure a non-commercial alternative?
Or perhaps Mastodon & its values is always going to be niche social media?
@ChrisMayLA6 I have tried to get people in my life to switch from WhatsApp to signal. To me, the two applications look largely the same. Nonetheless, I have converted very few people who aren’t tech adjacent. I think the fedi is similar. It’s not actually any harder to sign up for than X/twitter, but there is some other friction
-
Even if someone doesn't immediately switch when you suggest it, the suggestion remains valuable.
Most people don't immediately switch based on one recommendation, but if they get two or three separate recommendations that tends to put something firmly on their radar.
So, it's always worth recommending something even if it doesn't seem to immediately lead to any changes, as it forms one of the multiple recommendations that many people need to hear.
