🧩 A math puzzle.

[c0dec0dec0de@hachyderm.io]

@zzt @jonpsp @internetarchive hey hey hey, Marlboro is a more responsible investor than that! They’d get consistent results from anything they released to answer questions.

[pixelrobot@neopaquita.es]

@internetarchive https://youtu.be/l60MnDJklnM

[billyjoebowers@mastodon.online]

@internetarchive

I never trusted these guys.

[hazel@shrimp.starlightnet.work]

@internetarchive eww

[sunz@social.translunar.academy]

@internetarchive@mastodon.archive.org absolutely baffled by your inability to read the fucking room.

[hellbeast@pleroma.envs.net]

@internetarchive Holy shit the chain of people (if it even is since IA is peddling LLM shit) that approved this needs an extended vacation

[cholling@bytes.programming.dev]

@internetarchive I just applied for a job with the IA. If that job is going to involve any contact with the planet-cooking plagiarism machines, please withdraw my application.

[thomasfuchs@hachyderm.io]

@internetarchive You could stop with this shit any time now

[ike_seblon@mastodon.social]

@internetarchive just want to pile on and say that this pile-on is far kinder than it could deservedly be. Thanks for the valuable work you do, now please put down the *fascist* poop dispensing machine and go wash your hands.

[burnitdown@beige.party]

@internetarchive

i'm only here to add one more "what the fuck is this, have you lost your mind" comment.

i'm pretty sure we already have all of the information we need about why the climate of our planet is becoming more dangerous, and who did it. all you've done is include yourself in the answer to the "and we know who did it" part. why would you want to be one in that number?

[3am@tech.lgbt]

@jackemled
@internetarchive

true, guess we'll have to just make sure we dont put all our eggs in 1 basket

[jrp@hub.kliklak.net]

@internetarchive This doesn't seem to land too well. What has gone wrong? No pun intended, i love, what you do. However eventually AI is mainly useful atm for you to defend the archive against the access of ... well: AI.

[cherrypixelbun@yiff.life]

@internetarchive hey what the fuck

[mhc@kolektiva.social]

@internetarchive oh no, please don't fall down this hole.

[polyplacophora@wandering.shop]

@internetarchive Stop using the damned thing.

[crowk@critter.cafe]

@internetarchive what is wrong with you? i can't believe this of the archive. i've made my last donation until this gets addressed. and i mean properly, not just a quiet little walkback. actually fucking insane what i just read, and where i read it from.

[pandora@eldritch.cafe]

@zzt @jonpsp @internetarchive We need a movie named Thank You For Prompting

[elliessurviving@tech.lgbt]

@internetarchive you seriously have lost all my respect promoting a misinfomation regurgitation tool like this

[voiceofvesperakamae@tech.lgbt]

@internetarchive Hey why would you think this is at all a good idea?

[gnomon@mastodon.social]

@internetarchive

s/and thier attributes/and their attributes/

s/still make sense/still makes sense/

s/(Half of the answers are actuarial and half of) it is not/\1 them are not/ # (and no mention in the article of the response to the half of the question about the morality of it?)

s/and the data map was useful/and the data map were useful/

Who wrote this article? There is no byline.

The Internet Archive should not be associating themselves with the work this article is about. For shame.