If you're a white person on the Fediverse and you've never seen someone called a slur, or threats made against them--congratulations!
-
-
@dave
This is why hiding content (either from blocks, lists, etc) has so many trolling edge cases....Which leads me to wonder: What is the reply's visibility being able to be set that supposed to do? What is the intended use case? Why can a replier or quoter be allowed to isolate someone like that? Is it hidden from moderators?
@Crissa @dave I limit reply visibility to followers only or mentioned only a lot when it's something that I don't want to show up on random stranger's timelines. Sometimes it's to reduce the amount of replyguys. Sometimes it's sorta personal stuff (not to the level of "move to Signal" but still not the sort of thing everyone needs to read)
-
@dave couldn't the post be signed including the security options? Then editing them would cause a bad sig and get it dropped?
-
@Crissa @dave I limit reply visibility to followers only or mentioned only a lot when it's something that I don't want to show up on random stranger's timelines. Sometimes it's to reduce the amount of replyguys. Sometimes it's sorta personal stuff (not to the level of "move to Signal" but still not the sort of thing everyone needs to read)
-
@dave i think if you're going to show receipts, then you should post them followers only. seems only right.
i wish more people would do this, but at the same time, i would never *ask* someone to do that; it's not fair on them.
But it does have a purpose. as you are pointing out, lots of folks don't know this is happening.
-
@dave when they did it on twiter, they got all the brigadeers to block the target first, so all they got was indirect harrassment and stories from friends, but the victim couldnt report them because it wasnt possible to hit the report button on a profile that blocks the person trying to report. it was a mechanism to chop them off of a community or run disinformation campaigns
-
@dave Is there a shit mastodon says account yet? Maybe people could anonymously shame the harassers by messaging screenshots and posting them that way.
-
@dave Could there be a moderation setting where I could choose not to see any posts that are followers only if I am not following the person who authored it? Even if it mentions me by name? But still see public posts that mention me by name.?
-
@dave doing the woooooooooork
-
@MxAlba @dave No, it doesn't work like that.
If their instance was breaking the reply restrictions rule, your instance would detect that when they try to federate the reply to your instance, and would reject it. Then you would not see it, and it also would not get federated to anyone who opens your post looking for the replies.
Your instance could also use detection of this behavior to automatically place the offending instance on limited federation and add it to a review queue of abusive instances that are candidates for defederation.
@dalias@hachyderm.io @dave@alvarado.social
Thanks for the education! So it does sound like that might be a solution... -
@dave this is actually super helpful for me, Dave. makes it super clear. I knew it was happening, never understood how, or why I couldn't see it.
Thank you!
-
> 5. Everybody says "I don't see it so it's not happening."
I would never say that. I think multiple times I've said "I don't see it but of course I believe you, what can we do?"
So what can we do?
-
@dave Would it be possible to add a way to ban "followers only replies"? As a toggle in user preferences, or something, anyone know?
-
If you're a white person on the Fediverse and you've never seen someone called a slur, or threats made against them--congratulations! You don't follow any dirtbags. But, it's happening every day and it's being hidden from you.
@dave Sorry to hear this. Do block people you don't like, seek out ones you do. You have to work to make Mastodon the place you want it to be. Sorry that you have to work harder than white people; if I could change that, I would.
-
@Crissa @dave I limit reply visibility to followers only or mentioned only a lot when it's something that I don't want to show up on random stranger's timelines. Sometimes it's to reduce the amount of replyguys. Sometimes it's sorta personal stuff (not to the level of "move to Signal" but still not the sort of thing everyone needs to read)
@JessTheUnstill @Crissa @dave I do it for call-ins. There are a lot of marginalized people in my circles, but we all make mistakes and every once in a while let slip an unexamined bias. So when one of my peers says something harmful, I'm likely to call them on it in a followers only post, because I don't want to leave it unaddressed but also really don't want to cause a dogpile. So it's a tool that's used both for preventing harassment and for harassment
I'm not sure how to resolve that -
@dalias@hachyderm.io @dave@alvarado.social
Thanks for the education! So it does sound like that might be a solution... -
@dave couldn't the post be signed including the security options? Then editing them would cause a bad sig and get it dropped?
@stuartyeates @dave It could, but that would be a whole new protocol. ActivityPubS
-
@dave Thanks for sharing your moderation advice.
I wonder if point 3/4 is occurring on other platforms due to the algorithms masking it.
e.g. You've previously expressed an interest in piling on to harras people, here's more opportunities for you to do that...
-
@dave I don't think sharing receipts is super necessary. It just smears the shit, so to speak.
And like, I've gotten this kind of harassment. usually on my pinned wedding photo because if one of my posts gets shared into an asshole instance, all the pinned posts come with it.
I report it to my admin, and she mashes the block/defederate button and takes care of it.
-
@dave @skinnylatte that explains a lot
