Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. u programmed this with claude?

u programmed this with claude?

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
31 Indlæg 22 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • jacqueline@chaos.socialJ jacqueline@chaos.social

    u programmed this with claude? the ai platform for bombing schools?

    j12i@weirder.earthJ This user is from outside of this forum
    j12i@weirder.earthJ This user is from outside of this forum
    j12i@weirder.earth
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #22

    boost with CN: LLMs, war crimes

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • aesthr@wandering.shopA This user is from outside of this forum
      aesthr@wandering.shopA This user is from outside of this forum
      aesthr@wandering.shop
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #23

      @aparrish you’re still missing the point here about tools vs services, about means of production. and I get the feeling you’re just trying to be contrarian for its own sake

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • aesthr@wandering.shopA This user is from outside of this forum
        aesthr@wandering.shopA This user is from outside of this forum
        aesthr@wandering.shop
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #24

        @aparrish i never said that tools in general don’t have politics embedded in them. Yet you went on an unsolicited lecture about it instead of engaging with what I was originally talking about.

        It’s arrogant and condescending. Now leave me the fuck alone

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • petealexharris@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
          petealexharris@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
          petealexharris@mastodon.scot
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #25

          @lycanoid @jacqueline

          Why assume the human giving the order or the intelligence agency running the AI to select targets *didn't* want to bomb a school?

          Obviously it's still a war crime even if they say it was based on faulty or outdated intel. Anyone can *say* that. Equally obviously, a calculation has been made about whether you get away with war crimes these days.

          I hate that it's so, but the simplest and most likely explanation for atrocity is always intent.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • herrold@dice.campH This user is from outside of this forum
            herrold@dice.campH This user is from outside of this forum
            herrold@dice.camp
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #26

            @aparrish eh, you were fine. This guy was just being a douche.

            I'd double-down and say that all tools shape behavior. Some more than others. Some better than others.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • kinosian@mastodon.sdf.orgK kinosian@mastodon.sdf.org

              @jacqueline Claude's actually the one who refused to do that, unless I'm missing something? ChatGPT is the school-bomber.

              ottumm@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
              ottumm@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
              ottumm@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #27

              @kinosian @jacqueline Anthropic got the headline they wanted for “refusing” but they are in use for target selection and planning via Palantir. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/mar/01/claude-anthropic-iran-strikes-us-military

              kinosian@mastodon.sdf.orgK 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • V vyllenjamnin@mastodon.social

                @jacqueline imh this is the same as saying "You are using the same pen as they did sign the Nuremberg laws with". People are accountable for these atrocities, AIs are just another (problematic) tool enabling bad people to do bad things more efficiently. Don't forget who is truly responsible here.

                ojrask@piipitin.fiO This user is from outside of this forum
                ojrask@piipitin.fiO This user is from outside of this forum
                ojrask@piipitin.fi
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #28

                @vyllenjamnin @jacqueline

                You're probably paying for the tool, or at least contributing to the so-called valuation of the company providing it, hence providing the company with resources to provide child killing services elsewhere.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ottumm@mastodon.socialO ottumm@mastodon.social

                  @kinosian @jacqueline Anthropic got the headline they wanted for “refusing” but they are in use for target selection and planning via Palantir. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/mar/01/claude-anthropic-iran-strikes-us-military

                  kinosian@mastodon.sdf.orgK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kinosian@mastodon.sdf.orgK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kinosian@mastodon.sdf.org
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #29

                  @ottumm @jacqueline Sorry to hear that, but thank you for letting me know!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • V vyllenjamnin@mastodon.social

                    @jacqueline imh this is the same as saying "You are using the same pen as they did sign the Nuremberg laws with". People are accountable for these atrocities, AIs are just another (problematic) tool enabling bad people to do bad things more efficiently. Don't forget who is truly responsible here.

                    andre123@snowfan.itA This user is from outside of this forum
                    andre123@snowfan.itA This user is from outside of this forum
                    andre123@snowfan.it
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #30

                    @vyllenjamnin while I get your point, I think AIs (and of course people/companies behind them) are not as simple a tool as a pen. So I tend not to agree with your analogy in this case.

                    @jacqueline

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                      gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                      gsuberland@chaos.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #31

                      @s0 @jacqueline endless blockfodder

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • pelle@veganism.socialP pelle@veganism.social shared this topic
                      Svar
                      • Svar som emne
                      Login for at svare
                      • Ældste til nyeste
                      • Nyeste til ældste
                      • Most Votes


                      • Log ind

                      • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      Graciously hosted by data.coop
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Hjem
                      • Seneste
                      • Etiketter
                      • Populære
                      • Verden
                      • Bruger
                      • Grupper