Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. hey so about your favorite boy hank green.

hey so about your favorite boy hank green.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
151 Indlæg 57 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

    @zzt @davidgerard thanks. we were saying it was like an MLM, but this is more literal than we expected

    noiseician@mastodon.worldN This user is from outside of this forum
    noiseician@mastodon.worldN This user is from outside of this forum
    noiseician@mastodon.world
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #62

    @ireneista marketing cult
    @zzt @davidgerard

    ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI dogfox@kpop.socialD 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • noiseician@mastodon.worldN noiseician@mastodon.world

      @ireneista marketing cult
      @zzt @davidgerard

      ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
      ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
      ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #63

      @noiseician @zzt @davidgerard we personally have a high bar for using that word, because cults are a serious thing that ruin people's lives (we've seen it more than once). this does seem like it might be comparable in severity but we're not at the point where we have enough information to be comfortable saying that, ourselves.

      you're welcome to say it though. we realize most people aren't, uh, like this ^^''''

      noiseician@mastodon.worldN 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

        @noiseician @zzt @davidgerard we personally have a high bar for using that word, because cults are a serious thing that ruin people's lives (we've seen it more than once). this does seem like it might be comparable in severity but we're not at the point where we have enough information to be comfortable saying that, ourselves.

        you're welcome to say it though. we realize most people aren't, uh, like this ^^''''

        noiseician@mastodon.worldN This user is from outside of this forum
        noiseician@mastodon.worldN This user is from outside of this forum
        noiseician@mastodon.world
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #64

        @ireneista yes, there are cults and then there are kvlts...
        @zzt @davidgerard

        davidgerard@circumstances.runD 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

          @zzt @davidgerard thanks. we were saying it was like an MLM, but this is more literal than we expected

          lina@neuromatch.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
          lina@neuromatch.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
          lina@neuromatch.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #65

          @ireneista
          @zzt @davidgerard

          LLMMLM

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • noiseician@mastodon.worldN noiseician@mastodon.world

            @ireneista yes, there are cults and then there are kvlts...
            @zzt @davidgerard

            davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
            davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
            davidgerard@circumstances.run
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #66

            @noiseician @ireneista @zzt I spent the 90s learning far too much about Scientology, which is the Godwin example of a cult

            but I would absolutely put the TESCREAL cluster in the same box

            it's not just a cult! it's a cult incubator!

            everything the way it's set up is high control and abuses people for power over them, it's full of sexual predators, and it has little offshoot cults that try to kill people. also many individuals driven to violent madness by its demands.

            the Zizians are the famous offshoot, but also there's Leverage Research who were sure sufficient study of rationality would grant you actual psychic powers.

            it's pretty awesome!

            also they publicly declared me the #1 enemy of Rationality.

            fortunately, i'm protected by them being the greatest pile of fuckups i can think of

            ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

              @noiseician @ireneista @zzt I spent the 90s learning far too much about Scientology, which is the Godwin example of a cult

              but I would absolutely put the TESCREAL cluster in the same box

              it's not just a cult! it's a cult incubator!

              everything the way it's set up is high control and abuses people for power over them, it's full of sexual predators, and it has little offshoot cults that try to kill people. also many individuals driven to violent madness by its demands.

              the Zizians are the famous offshoot, but also there's Leverage Research who were sure sufficient study of rationality would grant you actual psychic powers.

              it's pretty awesome!

              also they publicly declared me the #1 enemy of Rationality.

              fortunately, i'm protected by them being the greatest pile of fuckups i can think of

              ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
              ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
              ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #67

              @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt we agree that there are cults in the strict sense within that broadly-defined cluster, for sure.

              TESCREAL is an umbrella term, which is important when opposing it because the thing being fought is amorphous, but it's also important to not mistake a part for the whole or vice-versa

              ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI davidgerard@circumstances.runD 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

                @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt we agree that there are cults in the strict sense within that broadly-defined cluster, for sure.

                TESCREAL is an umbrella term, which is important when opposing it because the thing being fought is amorphous, but it's also important to not mistake a part for the whole or vice-versa

                ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #68

                @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt all we're advocating for is careful thinking. if we get sloppy we can't strategize.

                davidgerard@circumstances.runD 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

                  @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt we agree that there are cults in the strict sense within that broadly-defined cluster, for sure.

                  TESCREAL is an umbrella term, which is important when opposing it because the thing being fought is amorphous, but it's also important to not mistake a part for the whole or vice-versa

                  davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                  davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                  davidgerard@circumstances.run
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #69

                  @ireneista @noiseician @zzt it's not that amorphous and it's closer knit than its marketing pretends

                  like I used to say "the LessWrong-originated subculture" but "TESCREAL" is a term that means the same thing

                  do you have particular good bits you're thinking of? cos substantially it's a sea of rancid

                  bms@mastodon.bsd.cafeB jonpsp@mstdn.socialJ 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • xan@xantronix.socialX xan@xantronix.social

                    @cyberquixote you just gotta wear your autism like an albacore around your neck to remind you of the weight of your responsibilities to the world @zzt

                    jmccyoung@mstdn.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jmccyoung@mstdn.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jmccyoung@mstdn.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #70

                    @xan @cyberquixote @zzt Albacore > albatross - good swap for the image.

                    bstacey@icosahedron.websiteB 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

                      @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt all we're advocating for is careful thinking. if we get sloppy we can't strategize.

                      davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                      davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                      davidgerard@circumstances.run
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #71

                      @ireneista @noiseician @zzt if you can point to a specific objection feel free, but a nonspecific claim I'm being sloppy, that i'm engaging in careless thinking, or that i'm mistaking a part for the whole or vice-versa sort of requires you to actually get specific, else it's a bit less than worthless. i have a large bag of specifics here if you are able to argue those.

                      ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                        @ireneista @noiseician @zzt if you can point to a specific objection feel free, but a nonspecific claim I'm being sloppy, that i'm engaging in careless thinking, or that i'm mistaking a part for the whole or vice-versa sort of requires you to actually get specific, else it's a bit less than worthless. i have a large bag of specifics here if you are able to argue those.

                        ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                        ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                        ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #72

                        @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt oh it's all bad. we're not saying any of it is good. we understand how any disagreement is going to come off that way, but we agree strongly with the emotion of what you're saying

                        ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI davidgerard@circumstances.runD 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

                          @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt oh it's all bad. we're not saying any of it is good. we understand how any disagreement is going to come off that way, but we agree strongly with the emotion of what you're saying

                          ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                          ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                          ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #73

                          @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt
                          it's the substance we take issue with. our point is quite simply that if we can't think precisely, we can't strategize for how to fight effectively. this tendency everyone seems to have to gesture at a feeling and use it as a basis for planning, is, like... bad. self-defeating.

                          ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                            @noiseician @ireneista @zzt I spent the 90s learning far too much about Scientology, which is the Godwin example of a cult

                            but I would absolutely put the TESCREAL cluster in the same box

                            it's not just a cult! it's a cult incubator!

                            everything the way it's set up is high control and abuses people for power over them, it's full of sexual predators, and it has little offshoot cults that try to kill people. also many individuals driven to violent madness by its demands.

                            the Zizians are the famous offshoot, but also there's Leverage Research who were sure sufficient study of rationality would grant you actual psychic powers.

                            it's pretty awesome!

                            also they publicly declared me the #1 enemy of Rationality.

                            fortunately, i'm protected by them being the greatest pile of fuckups i can think of

                            noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN This user is from outside of this forum
                            noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN This user is from outside of this forum
                            noodlemaz@mstdn.games
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #74

                            @davidgerard @noiseician @ireneista @zzt I don't have a bookmarked piece of writing that's like a tour of why EAs (LessWrong, and the rest) are fkin bananas

                            Especially for people who outright reject the notion of the 'TESCREAL bundle'.
                            I wish I had one.
                            But also I imagine it's just too complicated, messy and bizarre to explain very succinctly 😕

                            ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI davidgerard@circumstances.runD crow@pagan.plusC smidgybit@mastodon.socialS 4 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

                              @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt
                              it's the substance we take issue with. our point is quite simply that if we can't think precisely, we can't strategize for how to fight effectively. this tendency everyone seems to have to gesture at a feeling and use it as a basis for planning, is, like... bad. self-defeating.

                              ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                              ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                              ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #75

                              @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt if literally everything is a cult, then nothing is a cult, and we can't plan how to stop cults, because we'll be trying to say "let's identify the costly signals so we can figure out how to interrupt them" or whatever, and somebody will come along and say "it's all a cult!" and that will be the end of the discussion

                              ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI davidgerard@circumstances.runD zzt@mas.toZ 3 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

                                @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt if literally everything is a cult, then nothing is a cult, and we can't plan how to stop cults, because we'll be trying to say "let's identify the costly signals so we can figure out how to interrupt them" or whatever, and somebody will come along and say "it's all a cult!" and that will be the end of the discussion

                                ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                                ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                                ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #76

                                @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt sorry if we're a little worked up about it but we needed to channel some emotion to get our point out. we hope it makes sense at least.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN noodlemaz@mstdn.games

                                  @davidgerard @noiseician @ireneista @zzt I don't have a bookmarked piece of writing that's like a tour of why EAs (LessWrong, and the rest) are fkin bananas

                                  Especially for people who outright reject the notion of the 'TESCREAL bundle'.
                                  I wish I had one.
                                  But also I imagine it's just too complicated, messy and bizarre to explain very succinctly 😕

                                  ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #77

                                  @noodlemaz @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt we were in the room when the term TESCREAL was coined. we strongly endorse using that term in fighting it.

                                  ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN noodlemaz@mstdn.games

                                    @davidgerard @noiseician @ireneista @zzt I don't have a bookmarked piece of writing that's like a tour of why EAs (LessWrong, and the rest) are fkin bananas

                                    Especially for people who outright reject the notion of the 'TESCREAL bundle'.
                                    I wish I had one.
                                    But also I imagine it's just too complicated, messy and bizarre to explain very succinctly 😕

                                    davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    davidgerard@circumstances.run
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #78

                                    @noodlemaz @noiseician @ireneista @zzt I do! It's "More Everything Forever" by Adam Becker and it's the book I was failing to write over 2018-2021!

                                    noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN peter@thepit.socialP 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

                                      @noodlemaz @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt we were in the room when the term TESCREAL was coined. we strongly endorse using that term in fighting it.

                                      ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #79

                                      @noodlemaz @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt if your takeaway is that we disagree with your points, you're not reading a word we say.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

                                        @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt oh it's all bad. we're not saying any of it is good. we understand how any disagreement is going to come off that way, but we agree strongly with the emotion of what you're saying

                                        davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        davidgerard@circumstances.run
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #80

                                        @ireneista @noiseician @zzt that's great! so please do withdraw your claims that you made in direct response to a carefully weighed statement on an area that actually I know a fucking lot about

                                        ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                                          @ireneista @noiseician @zzt that's great! so please do withdraw your claims that you made in direct response to a carefully weighed statement on an area that actually I know a fucking lot about

                                          ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #81

                                          @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt beg pardon? we are fucking agreeing with you about everything except one specific thing about how this is framed. could you please re-read what we wrote and tell us which part you are asking us to retract?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper