Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. hey so about your favorite boy hank green.

hey so about your favorite boy hank green.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
151 Indlæg 57 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

    @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt we agree that there are cults in the strict sense within that broadly-defined cluster, for sure.

    TESCREAL is an umbrella term, which is important when opposing it because the thing being fought is amorphous, but it's also important to not mistake a part for the whole or vice-versa

    davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
    davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
    davidgerard@circumstances.run
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #69

    @ireneista @noiseician @zzt it's not that amorphous and it's closer knit than its marketing pretends

    like I used to say "the LessWrong-originated subculture" but "TESCREAL" is a term that means the same thing

    do you have particular good bits you're thinking of? cos substantially it's a sea of rancid

    bms@mastodon.bsd.cafeB jonpsp@mstdn.socialJ 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • xan@xantronix.socialX xan@xantronix.social

      @cyberquixote you just gotta wear your autism like an albacore around your neck to remind you of the weight of your responsibilities to the world @zzt

      jmccyoung@mstdn.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jmccyoung@mstdn.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jmccyoung@mstdn.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #70

      @xan @cyberquixote @zzt Albacore > albatross - good swap for the image.

      bstacey@icosahedron.websiteB 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

        @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt all we're advocating for is careful thinking. if we get sloppy we can't strategize.

        davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
        davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
        davidgerard@circumstances.run
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #71

        @ireneista @noiseician @zzt if you can point to a specific objection feel free, but a nonspecific claim I'm being sloppy, that i'm engaging in careless thinking, or that i'm mistaking a part for the whole or vice-versa sort of requires you to actually get specific, else it's a bit less than worthless. i have a large bag of specifics here if you are able to argue those.

        ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

          @ireneista @noiseician @zzt if you can point to a specific objection feel free, but a nonspecific claim I'm being sloppy, that i'm engaging in careless thinking, or that i'm mistaking a part for the whole or vice-versa sort of requires you to actually get specific, else it's a bit less than worthless. i have a large bag of specifics here if you are able to argue those.

          ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
          ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
          ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #72

          @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt oh it's all bad. we're not saying any of it is good. we understand how any disagreement is going to come off that way, but we agree strongly with the emotion of what you're saying

          ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI davidgerard@circumstances.runD 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

            @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt oh it's all bad. we're not saying any of it is good. we understand how any disagreement is going to come off that way, but we agree strongly with the emotion of what you're saying

            ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
            ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
            ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #73

            @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt
            it's the substance we take issue with. our point is quite simply that if we can't think precisely, we can't strategize for how to fight effectively. this tendency everyone seems to have to gesture at a feeling and use it as a basis for planning, is, like... bad. self-defeating.

            ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

              @noiseician @ireneista @zzt I spent the 90s learning far too much about Scientology, which is the Godwin example of a cult

              but I would absolutely put the TESCREAL cluster in the same box

              it's not just a cult! it's a cult incubator!

              everything the way it's set up is high control and abuses people for power over them, it's full of sexual predators, and it has little offshoot cults that try to kill people. also many individuals driven to violent madness by its demands.

              the Zizians are the famous offshoot, but also there's Leverage Research who were sure sufficient study of rationality would grant you actual psychic powers.

              it's pretty awesome!

              also they publicly declared me the #1 enemy of Rationality.

              fortunately, i'm protected by them being the greatest pile of fuckups i can think of

              noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN This user is from outside of this forum
              noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN This user is from outside of this forum
              noodlemaz@mstdn.games
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #74

              @davidgerard @noiseician @ireneista @zzt I don't have a bookmarked piece of writing that's like a tour of why EAs (LessWrong, and the rest) are fkin bananas

              Especially for people who outright reject the notion of the 'TESCREAL bundle'.
              I wish I had one.
              But also I imagine it's just too complicated, messy and bizarre to explain very succinctly 😕

              ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI davidgerard@circumstances.runD crow@pagan.plusC smidgybit@mastodon.socialS 4 Replies Last reply
              0
              • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

                @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt
                it's the substance we take issue with. our point is quite simply that if we can't think precisely, we can't strategize for how to fight effectively. this tendency everyone seems to have to gesture at a feeling and use it as a basis for planning, is, like... bad. self-defeating.

                ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #75

                @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt if literally everything is a cult, then nothing is a cult, and we can't plan how to stop cults, because we'll be trying to say "let's identify the costly signals so we can figure out how to interrupt them" or whatever, and somebody will come along and say "it's all a cult!" and that will be the end of the discussion

                ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI davidgerard@circumstances.runD zzt@mas.toZ 3 Replies Last reply
                0
                • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

                  @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt if literally everything is a cult, then nothing is a cult, and we can't plan how to stop cults, because we'll be trying to say "let's identify the costly signals so we can figure out how to interrupt them" or whatever, and somebody will come along and say "it's all a cult!" and that will be the end of the discussion

                  ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                  ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                  ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #76

                  @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt sorry if we're a little worked up about it but we needed to channel some emotion to get our point out. we hope it makes sense at least.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN noodlemaz@mstdn.games

                    @davidgerard @noiseician @ireneista @zzt I don't have a bookmarked piece of writing that's like a tour of why EAs (LessWrong, and the rest) are fkin bananas

                    Especially for people who outright reject the notion of the 'TESCREAL bundle'.
                    I wish I had one.
                    But also I imagine it's just too complicated, messy and bizarre to explain very succinctly 😕

                    ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                    ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                    ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #77

                    @noodlemaz @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt we were in the room when the term TESCREAL was coined. we strongly endorse using that term in fighting it.

                    ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN noodlemaz@mstdn.games

                      @davidgerard @noiseician @ireneista @zzt I don't have a bookmarked piece of writing that's like a tour of why EAs (LessWrong, and the rest) are fkin bananas

                      Especially for people who outright reject the notion of the 'TESCREAL bundle'.
                      I wish I had one.
                      But also I imagine it's just too complicated, messy and bizarre to explain very succinctly 😕

                      davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                      davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                      davidgerard@circumstances.run
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #78

                      @noodlemaz @noiseician @ireneista @zzt I do! It's "More Everything Forever" by Adam Becker and it's the book I was failing to write over 2018-2021!

                      noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN peter@thepit.socialP 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

                        @noodlemaz @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt we were in the room when the term TESCREAL was coined. we strongly endorse using that term in fighting it.

                        ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                        ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                        ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #79

                        @noodlemaz @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt if your takeaway is that we disagree with your points, you're not reading a word we say.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

                          @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt oh it's all bad. we're not saying any of it is good. we understand how any disagreement is going to come off that way, but we agree strongly with the emotion of what you're saying

                          davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                          davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                          davidgerard@circumstances.run
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #80

                          @ireneista @noiseician @zzt that's great! so please do withdraw your claims that you made in direct response to a carefully weighed statement on an area that actually I know a fucking lot about

                          ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                            @ireneista @noiseician @zzt that's great! so please do withdraw your claims that you made in direct response to a carefully weighed statement on an area that actually I know a fucking lot about

                            ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                            ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                            ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #81

                            @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt beg pardon? we are fucking agreeing with you about everything except one specific thing about how this is framed. could you please re-read what we wrote and tell us which part you are asking us to retract?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

                              @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt if literally everything is a cult, then nothing is a cult, and we can't plan how to stop cults, because we'll be trying to say "let's identify the costly signals so we can figure out how to interrupt them" or whatever, and somebody will come along and say "it's all a cult!" and that will be the end of the discussion

                              davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                              davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                              davidgerard@circumstances.run
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #82

                              @ireneista @noiseician @zzt right, so you said that responding directly to me, so what percentage are you putting that as applying to what I wrote 0%, 100% or something else?

                              davidgerard@circumstances.runD 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                                @ireneista @noiseician @zzt right, so you said that responding directly to me, so what percentage are you putting that as applying to what I wrote 0%, 100% or something else?

                                davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                                davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                                davidgerard@circumstances.run
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #83

                                @ireneista @noiseician @zzt i mean, don't suggest vague play it down moderation in response to a post full of specifics

                                ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                                  @ireneista @noiseician @zzt i mean, don't suggest vague play it down moderation in response to a post full of specifics

                                  ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #84

                                  @davidgerard so the sequence of events from our perspective is that @zzt said something we agree with, and we said so. @noiseician replied to us dragging things in the direction of more emotional, less oureasoned, along a specific pattern we've identified as important to counterbalance, so we did so. we didn't notice you were @'d in by the original QT at this point, and would have removed you if we had, sorry about that. >

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

                                    @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt if literally everything is a cult, then nothing is a cult, and we can't plan how to stop cults, because we'll be trying to say "let's identify the costly signals so we can figure out how to interrupt them" or whatever, and somebody will come along and say "it's all a cult!" and that will be the end of the discussion

                                    zzt@mas.toZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    zzt@mas.toZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    zzt@mas.to
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #85

                                    @ireneista @davidgerard @noiseician literally anything isn’t a cult, we’re discussing a specific thing here. or trying to, at least.

                                    you may not like TESCREAL as a term and that’s fair, it’s a clumsy-ass acronym, but as people like David and myself are actively researching this subculture and it’s something that’s very actively hurting people, I think a little bit of definitional fuzziness can be excused. I don’t know if this is your first rodeo in dealing with an active cult, but refusing to call a spade a spade due to your own lack of knowledge will lead to people getting hurt.

                                    ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI davidgerard@circumstances.runD 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                                      @ireneista @noiseician @zzt i mean, don't suggest vague play it down moderation in response to a post full of specifics

                                      ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #86

                                      @davidgerard so the sequence of events from our perspective is that @zzt said something we agree with, and we said so. @noiseician replied to us dragging things in the direction of more emotional, less oureasoned, along a specific pattern we've identified as important to counterbalance, so we did so. we didn't notice you were @'d in by the original QT at this point, and would have removed you if we had, sorry about that. >

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • zzt@mas.toZ zzt@mas.to

                                        @ireneista @davidgerard @noiseician literally anything isn’t a cult, we’re discussing a specific thing here. or trying to, at least.

                                        you may not like TESCREAL as a term and that’s fair, it’s a clumsy-ass acronym, but as people like David and myself are actively researching this subculture and it’s something that’s very actively hurting people, I think a little bit of definitional fuzziness can be excused. I don’t know if this is your first rodeo in dealing with an active cult, but refusing to call a spade a spade due to your own lack of knowledge will lead to people getting hurt.

                                        ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #87

                                        @zzt @davidgerard @noiseician we adore the term. it's a great term. we endorse it strongly. we agree that there are multiple cults under the TESCREAL umbrella. we apologize that it came off as if we were saying something else; we have been attempting to agree with all that from the start. see our replies to David for further details, we don't have the energy to say it again.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                                          @noodlemaz @noiseician @ireneista @zzt I do! It's "More Everything Forever" by Adam Becker and it's the book I was failing to write over 2018-2021!

                                          noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          noodlemaz@mstdn.games
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #88

                                          @davidgerard @noiseician @ireneista @zzt looks like it might be similar to this!
                                          https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-nerd-reich-silicon-valley-fascism-and-the-war-on-democracy-gil-dur-n/a6f6f0dce1150339
                                          Added to TBR pile

                                          I was mostly thinking of a shareable article for an overview but yeah, seems too sprawling to contain

                                          davidgerard@circumstances.runD 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper