Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Meta does not want you to know that you can improve the quality of these AI glasses by just microwaving them for one minute.

Meta does not want you to know that you can improve the quality of these AI glasses by just microwaving them for one minute.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
40 Indlæg 31 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • harrysentonbury@social.linux.pizzaH harrysentonbury@social.linux.pizza

    @vowe also from israeli product checker:
    "Yes, botcott!
    Ray-Ban is a brand of EssilorLuxottica
    EssilorLuxottica has invested in Israel by acquiring Nuance Hearing, a Tel Aviv-based startup. This is not its first in Israel. In 2010, the company acquired a 50% stake in Shamir Optical, an optical lens manufacturer in Kibbutz Shamir, Upper Galilee, for $130 million, and later purchased the remaining 50% in 2022."

    https://masjidalaqsa.com/israeli-product-checker-boycott-list

    maccruiskeen@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
    maccruiskeen@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
    maccruiskeen@social.linux.pizza
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #28

    @harrysentonbury @vowe Almost everything eyeglasses-related is a brand of EssilorLuxottica. Good luck with that boycott.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • tattie@eldritch.cafeT tattie@eldritch.cafe

      @vowe will that destroy the camera stuff? I have no idea how microwaves and electronics interact.

      gulfie@mastodonapp.ukG This user is from outside of this forum
      gulfie@mastodonapp.ukG This user is from outside of this forum
      gulfie@mastodonapp.uk
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #29

      @Tattie @vowe nah it’s all good mate, a dose of microwaves helps sharpen up the images

      tattie@eldritch.cafeT 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jumpingjackrussell@mstdn.socialJ jumpingjackrussell@mstdn.social

        @vowe

        This would make a great Instagram post.

        khleedril@cyberplace.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
        khleedril@cyberplace.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
        khleedril@cyberplace.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #30

        @jumpingjackrussell @vowe No it wouldn't. Don't copy this post to Instagram. Under no circumstances. Don't even think about doing it. Everybody will hate you.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • histopol@mastodon.socialH histopol@mastodon.social

          @vowe

          Private #MassSurveillance and the virtual end of #Privacy in public spaces

          (2/2)

          ...fitness spaces, locker rooms, and private businesses. In 2024, 👉#Harvard researchers were able to run facial recognition software on recorded footage from #Meta’s Ray-Ban glasses to successfully locate the names, addresses, and other personal information of passersby from public databases. 👈 Morality aside, privacy law also hasn’t kept up... "

          https://hyperallergic.com/guerrilla-london-bus-ads-mock-kylie-jenners-meta-glasses-campaign/

          smallcircles@social.coopS This user is from outside of this forum
          smallcircles@social.coopS This user is from outside of this forum
          smallcircles@social.coop
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #31

          @HistoPol @vowe

          There's a campaign against these glasses, who have a great sticker, but also a good discussion on proper use cases for people with visual impairments. See:

          https://social.coop/@smallcircles/116912693079475641

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • gulfie@mastodonapp.ukG gulfie@mastodonapp.uk

            @Tattie @vowe nah it’s all good mate, a dose of microwaves helps sharpen up the images

            tattie@eldritch.cafeT This user is from outside of this forum
            tattie@eldritch.cafeT This user is from outside of this forum
            tattie@eldritch.cafe
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #32

            @gulfie serious question tho!
            @vowe

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • vowe@social.heise.deV vowe@social.heise.de

              Meta does not want you to know that you can improve the quality of these AI glasses by just microwaving them for one minute. Pass it on.

              ohmrun@indieweb.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
              ohmrun@indieweb.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
              ohmrun@indieweb.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #33

              @vowe
              I put my Meta Raybans in for a minute and half because it's only 1100 watts rather than 1500.
              It's important to know the power of your microwave so you know how long they'll take.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • somlu1968@mastodon.socialS somlu1968@mastodon.social

                @lennybacon hm #TeamBabylon5

                Gleiche Technik anderer Name PPG
                @vowe

                somlu1968@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                somlu1968@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                somlu1968@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #34

                @lennybacon Bis wir diese Technik zur Verfügung haben, nehme ich diese App , die mir sagt, (habs noch nicht getestet) ob so ein Ding in meiner Nähe ist. @vowe

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • bit@ohai.socialB bit@ohai.social

                  @vowe If you plan on boycotting Ray Ban, know that it's a brand from the Luxottica group, which owns and licenses a lot more brands.

                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luxottica#Eyewear_brands

                  [incomplete list]

                  Armani Exchange
                  Brooks Brothers
                  Bulgari
                  Burberry
                  Chanel
                  Coach
                  Dolce & Gabbana
                  Emporio Armani
                  Giorgio Armani
                  Michael Kors
                  Miu Miu
                  Oakley
                  Oliver Peoples
                  Persol
                  Polo Ralph Lauren
                  Prada
                  Ralph Eyewear
                  Ralph Lauren
                  Scuderia Ferrari
                  Sferoflex
                  Starck Biotech Paris
                  Swarovski
                  Tiffany & Co.
                  Tory Burch
                  Valentino
                  Versace
                  Vogue

                  c0dec0dec0de@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                  c0dec0dec0de@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                  c0dec0dec0de@hachyderm.io
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #35

                  @bit @vowe I forgot about that roll up. *takes off glasses and looks at them* yup, those fuckers own the factory that made these frames.

                  c0dec0dec0de@hachyderm.ioC 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • c0dec0dec0de@hachyderm.ioC c0dec0dec0de@hachyderm.io

                    @bit @vowe I forgot about that roll up. *takes off glasses and looks at them* yup, those fuckers own the factory that made these frames.

                    c0dec0dec0de@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                    c0dec0dec0de@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                    c0dec0dec0de@hachyderm.io
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #36

                    @bit @vowe I miss rimless glasses, but the wife thinks that they’re too “serial killer in media”

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • vowe@social.heise.deV vowe@social.heise.de

                      Meta does not want you to know that you can improve the quality of these AI glasses by just microwaving them for one minute. Pass it on.

                      ox1de@cyberplace.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                      ox1de@cyberplace.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                      ox1de@cyberplace.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #37

                      @vowe you’re right, the microwave improved the prescription. I didn’t need to go back to the optometrist. You saved me a lot of money.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • vowe@social.heise.deV vowe@social.heise.de

                        Meta does not want you to know that you can improve the quality of these AI glasses by just microwaving them for one minute. Pass it on.

                        scalonnec@pouet.chapril.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                        scalonnec@pouet.chapril.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                        scalonnec@pouet.chapril.org
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #38

                        @vowe Oh here is the clickbait version, designed perfectly to be sexist, insulting and liar just like the real ones :
                        "Meta Ray-Ban : that easy trick that Meta doesn't want you to know to denude girls"

                        Hope such a honeypot title would break some of these toxic owners "glasses"...

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • vowe@social.heise.deV vowe@social.heise.de

                          Meta does not want you to know that you can improve the quality of these AI glasses by just microwaving them for one minute. Pass it on.

                          normjess@tech.lgbtN This user is from outside of this forum
                          normjess@tech.lgbtN This user is from outside of this forum
                          normjess@tech.lgbt
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #39

                          @vowe not every Trump supporter is a racist but every racist is a Trump supporter

                          not every Meta glasses user is a rapist but every rapist is a Meta glasses user

                          the rest are just other kinds of stalkers

                          its the staff too. its their 'masculine' culture. it started out as a webpage for rating women and its grown into stalker tech for a bunch of creepy men who women want nothing to do with

                          so many lawsuits because the staff read their ex-girlfriend's private messages and such you could paint a huge bridge with them

                          and we haven't even got to Meta selling your personal information to third parties, or running experiments using certain ads to see if they can influence elections

                          keep calling them perverts, its sticking and damaging them, despite all their money and attempts to change things

                          these glasses are less popular than AI as a whole, and that's saying something

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • vowe@social.heise.deV vowe@social.heise.de

                            Meta does not want you to know that you can improve the quality of these AI glasses by just microwaving them for one minute. Pass it on.

                            suzi_1960@mastodon.nlS This user is from outside of this forum
                            suzi_1960@mastodon.nlS This user is from outside of this forum
                            suzi_1960@mastodon.nl
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #40

                            @vowe grinn

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • strit@mastodon.socialS strit@mastodon.social shared this topic
                            Svar
                            • Svar som emne
                            Login for at svare
                            • Ældste til nyeste
                            • Nyeste til ældste
                            • Most Votes


                            • Log ind

                            • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                            • Login or register to search.
                            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                            Graciously hosted by data.coop
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Hjem
                            • Seneste
                            • Etiketter
                            • Populære
                            • Verden
                            • Bruger
                            • Grupper