Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Linus Torvalds shares his thoughts on Anti-AI coding rules on Linux mailing list.

Linus Torvalds shares his thoughts on Anti-AI coding rules on Linux mailing list.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
54 Indlæg 45 Posters 4 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • nixcraft@mastodon.socialN nixcraft@mastodon.social

    Linus Torvalds shares his thoughts on Anti-AI coding rules on Linux mailing list.

    https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=whTs09_ozN+e09GU68N1wPP56MUzDjrg9rnKxQUa0A_4Q@mail.gmail.com/

    He is doubling down on AI. This will come back to bite him. He thinks people using LLMs for coding are actually checking their work 😂 Code reviewers are just rubber stamping PRs. Nobody in their right mind can look at 100s of PRs per day &d manually go through them especially since they don't even know if they'll have a IT job left at the end of the day. It's a race to the bottom now

    jesse@social.jelliefrontier.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jesse@social.jelliefrontier.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jesse@social.jelliefrontier.net
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #28

    @nixCraft Uf what a bad take. Not all tools are created equal.

    “No sharp knives in here because they can be misused for violence.”

    “Oh, so I guess we can’t use straws or spoons either?! For that matter, this food shouldn’t be on a plate!”

    iscarlosmolero@landofooo.socialI 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • epistomai@mastodon.socialE epistomai@mastodon.social

      @nixCraft Idk how Linus uses AI. I hate AI, but sometimes is kinda useful ONLY IF it's used locally hosted, like with Ollama.

      I'm more concerned about environmental impact than stealing knowledge, although both are major concerns

      swinburne@stopgenai.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
      swinburne@stopgenai.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
      swinburne@stopgenai.org
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #29

      @epistomai @nixCraft

      AFAIK he at least slop generates python code with LLMs and confuses gen AI to be some kind of tool. How things (apparent psychosis) are going i suspect he frequently converses with the machine, too.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • nixcraft@mastodon.socialN nixcraft@mastodon.social

        Linus Torvalds shares his thoughts on Anti-AI coding rules on Linux mailing list.

        https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=whTs09_ozN+e09GU68N1wPP56MUzDjrg9rnKxQUa0A_4Q@mail.gmail.com/

        He is doubling down on AI. This will come back to bite him. He thinks people using LLMs for coding are actually checking their work 😂 Code reviewers are just rubber stamping PRs. Nobody in their right mind can look at 100s of PRs per day &d manually go through them especially since they don't even know if they'll have a IT job left at the end of the day. It's a race to the bottom now

        jeantranscene@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jeantranscene@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jeantranscene@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #30

        @nixCraft I may be wrong about that but it seems to me that the debate shouldn't be about whether an AI wrote the code or not but about code quality and whether trusted humans validate it. If your contribution goes in a queue that is reviewed at human pace and you have a storage quota for your contributions there's no way slop of any origin get into mainstream. AI or not AI becomes irrelevant. But maybe I'm overlooking something.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • nixcraft@mastodon.socialN nixcraft@mastodon.social

          Linus Torvalds shares his thoughts on Anti-AI coding rules on Linux mailing list.

          https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=whTs09_ozN+e09GU68N1wPP56MUzDjrg9rnKxQUa0A_4Q@mail.gmail.com/

          He is doubling down on AI. This will come back to bite him. He thinks people using LLMs for coding are actually checking their work 😂 Code reviewers are just rubber stamping PRs. Nobody in their right mind can look at 100s of PRs per day &d manually go through them especially since they don't even know if they'll have a IT job left at the end of the day. It's a race to the bottom now

          mxchara@cyberpunk.lolM This user is from outside of this forum
          mxchara@cyberpunk.lolM This user is from outside of this forum
          mxchara@cyberpunk.lol
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #31

          @nixCraft I love it when techbros begin their argument with "I don't understand" as a rhetorical stance because it's always true in a way: they don't understand.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • nixcraft@mastodon.socialN nixcraft@mastodon.social

            Linus Torvalds shares his thoughts on Anti-AI coding rules on Linux mailing list.

            https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=whTs09_ozN+e09GU68N1wPP56MUzDjrg9rnKxQUa0A_4Q@mail.gmail.com/

            He is doubling down on AI. This will come back to bite him. He thinks people using LLMs for coding are actually checking their work 😂 Code reviewers are just rubber stamping PRs. Nobody in their right mind can look at 100s of PRs per day &d manually go through them especially since they don't even know if they'll have a IT job left at the end of the day. It's a race to the bottom now

            jeantranscene@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jeantranscene@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jeantranscene@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #32

            @nixCraft It should be easy to maintain stats on the slop producers regardless of origins and slow the worst offenders even further somehow. There's always a human motivation behind any AI production. That shouldn't be too hard to control I think.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • nixcraft@mastodon.socialN nixcraft@mastodon.social

              Just so you know. Linus who is adopting AI tools. Here is how it is going right now. Linus Torvalds let Claude Code fix the Linux page cache. Then reviewers found a race https://thenewstack.io/torvalds-claude-code-kernel/

              omnivorous_narrator@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
              omnivorous_narrator@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
              omnivorous_narrator@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #33

              @nixCraft But also… “Amanda Caswell is an AI journalist, certified prompt engineer, and technology commentator whose work and expertise have been featured on Fox News and CBS News […] TNS owner Insight Partners is an investor in: Anthropic”

              (and the article is sprinkled with weird ambiguities. Wouldn’t surprise me if it was LLM-summarized or LLM-rewritten)

              omnivorous_narrator@mastodon.socialO datarama@hachyderm.ioD 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • nixcraft@mastodon.socialN nixcraft@mastodon.social

                Linus Torvalds shares his thoughts on Anti-AI coding rules on Linux mailing list.

                https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=whTs09_ozN+e09GU68N1wPP56MUzDjrg9rnKxQUa0A_4Q@mail.gmail.com/

                He is doubling down on AI. This will come back to bite him. He thinks people using LLMs for coding are actually checking their work 😂 Code reviewers are just rubber stamping PRs. Nobody in their right mind can look at 100s of PRs per day &d manually go through them especially since they don't even know if they'll have a IT job left at the end of the day. It's a race to the bottom now

                loadhigh@bitbang.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                loadhigh@bitbang.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                loadhigh@bitbang.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #34

                @nixCraft Man, that last paragraph, what a nasty guy.

                My respect goes to the maintainers who manage to handle working with an asshole like this. I know I wouldn't be able to do it.

                ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • loadhigh@bitbang.socialL loadhigh@bitbang.social

                  @nixCraft Man, that last paragraph, what a nasty guy.

                  My respect goes to the maintainers who manage to handle working with an asshole like this. I know I wouldn't be able to do it.

                  ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                  ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                  ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #35

                  @loadhigh @nixCraft yeah, he's been cruel without purpose for a long, long time. it's waxed and waned overt he decades.

                  maia@mastodon.artM 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • omnivorous_narrator@mastodon.socialO omnivorous_narrator@mastodon.social

                    @nixCraft But also… “Amanda Caswell is an AI journalist, certified prompt engineer, and technology commentator whose work and expertise have been featured on Fox News and CBS News […] TNS owner Insight Partners is an investor in: Anthropic”

                    (and the article is sprinkled with weird ambiguities. Wouldn’t surprise me if it was LLM-summarized or LLM-rewritten)

                    omnivorous_narrator@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                    omnivorous_narrator@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                    omnivorous_narrator@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #36

                    @nixCraft Anyway, apparently LWN also (very briefly) covered this: https://lwn.net/Articles/1100449/

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • syntaxseed@phpc.socialS syntaxseed@phpc.social

                      @nixCraft Comparing deterministic tools to #AI is wild.

                      Yes, I would create rules about not using compilers & editors if they gave different output each time I used them, occasionally gave wrong output, sometimes gave SLIGHTLY wrong output, and were just running predictions based on my past inputs rather than following sets of rules.

                      #Linus

                      cosmicspittle@ecoevo.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cosmicspittle@ecoevo.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cosmicspittle@ecoevo.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #37

                      @syntaxseed @nixCraft
                      I agree...and I most definitely would have rules for non-deterministic tools. Those were two inappropriate analogies.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • nixcraft@mastodon.socialN nixcraft@mastodon.social

                        Linus Torvalds shares his thoughts on Anti-AI coding rules on Linux mailing list.

                        https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=whTs09_ozN+e09GU68N1wPP56MUzDjrg9rnKxQUa0A_4Q@mail.gmail.com/

                        He is doubling down on AI. This will come back to bite him. He thinks people using LLMs for coding are actually checking their work 😂 Code reviewers are just rubber stamping PRs. Nobody in their right mind can look at 100s of PRs per day &d manually go through them especially since they don't even know if they'll have a IT job left at the end of the day. It's a race to the bottom now

                        gjoel@mstdn.dkG This user is from outside of this forum
                        gjoel@mstdn.dkG This user is from outside of this forum
                        gjoel@mstdn.dk
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #38

                        @nixCraft This post is actually a pretty good reply to that, even if it is on LinkedIn... https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ai-tool-rich-hickey-kjl8e

                        Use the tools you want - but don't use automation where your brain should do the job.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • nixcraft@mastodon.socialN nixcraft@mastodon.social

                          Linus Torvalds shares his thoughts on Anti-AI coding rules on Linux mailing list.

                          https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=whTs09_ozN+e09GU68N1wPP56MUzDjrg9rnKxQUa0A_4Q@mail.gmail.com/

                          He is doubling down on AI. This will come back to bite him. He thinks people using LLMs for coding are actually checking their work 😂 Code reviewers are just rubber stamping PRs. Nobody in their right mind can look at 100s of PRs per day &d manually go through them especially since they don't even know if they'll have a IT job left at the end of the day. It's a race to the bottom now

                          simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                          simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                          simonzerafa@infosec.exchange
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #39

                          @nixCraft

                          Someone needs to explain logical fallacies to Linus because he doesn't seem to understand False Equivalence and Straw Man, among others 🫤🤦‍♂️

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • __jm@mastodon.social_ __jm@mastodon.social

                            @epistomai there are better tools than ollama for local AI. https://sleepingrobots.com/dreams/stop-using-ollama/ explains why.

                            epistomai@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                            epistomai@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                            epistomai@mastodon.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #40

                            @__jm It is shady, yes, but there are also locally models, not only cloud. I've learned a lot how to 'bubble' mine. Still, I know there are other tools, but are more convoluted to me.

                            I only use it because I am forced to right now, once I get rid of that nonsense I will 💯 drop AI in any form

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • nixcraft@mastodon.socialN nixcraft@mastodon.social

                              Linus Torvalds shares his thoughts on Anti-AI coding rules on Linux mailing list.

                              https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=whTs09_ozN+e09GU68N1wPP56MUzDjrg9rnKxQUa0A_4Q@mail.gmail.com/

                              He is doubling down on AI. This will come back to bite him. He thinks people using LLMs for coding are actually checking their work 😂 Code reviewers are just rubber stamping PRs. Nobody in their right mind can look at 100s of PRs per day &d manually go through them especially since they don't even know if they'll have a IT job left at the end of the day. It's a race to the bottom now

                              muhammadfreesoftware@fosstodon.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                              muhammadfreesoftware@fosstodon.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                              muhammadfreesoftware@fosstodon.org
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #41

                              @nixCraft It's time we replace Linux with some other kernel by the way, it would be great if it was the Hurd

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • nixcraft@mastodon.socialN nixcraft@mastodon.social

                                Linus Torvalds shares his thoughts on Anti-AI coding rules on Linux mailing list.

                                https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=whTs09_ozN+e09GU68N1wPP56MUzDjrg9rnKxQUa0A_4Q@mail.gmail.com/

                                He is doubling down on AI. This will come back to bite him. He thinks people using LLMs for coding are actually checking their work 😂 Code reviewers are just rubber stamping PRs. Nobody in their right mind can look at 100s of PRs per day &d manually go through them especially since they don't even know if they'll have a IT job left at the end of the day. It's a race to the bottom now

                                tmw@ioc.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
                                tmw@ioc.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
                                tmw@ioc.exchange
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #42

                                @nixCraft i'm sick and tired of borderline-eugenicist freakshows like linus and other techbros who are so obsessed with "intelligence" that they dismiss anyone and everyone who doesn't appear to display it in a way that affirms their own egos.

                                people like this shouldn't be leading or managing anything that involves other people.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • jesse@social.jelliefrontier.netJ jesse@social.jelliefrontier.net

                                  @nixCraft Uf what a bad take. Not all tools are created equal.

                                  “No sharp knives in here because they can be misused for violence.”

                                  “Oh, so I guess we can’t use straws or spoons either?! For that matter, this food shouldn’t be on a plate!”

                                  iscarlosmolero@landofooo.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                  iscarlosmolero@landofooo.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                  iscarlosmolero@landofooo.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #43

                                  @jesse @nixCraft [REDACTED] misallocated hate lol.

                                  jesse@social.jelliefrontier.netJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • iscarlosmolero@landofooo.socialI iscarlosmolero@landofooo.social

                                    @jesse @nixCraft [REDACTED] misallocated hate lol.

                                    jesse@social.jelliefrontier.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    jesse@social.jelliefrontier.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    jesse@social.jelliefrontier.net
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #44

                                    @iscarlosmolero @nixCraft Your reply doesn’t match the anti-AI sentiments on your bio, so I’m assuming you didn’t realize I was referring to Linus’ take.

                                    Read slower and be less of a jerk, thanks.

                                    iscarlosmolero@landofooo.socialI 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • jesse@social.jelliefrontier.netJ jesse@social.jelliefrontier.net

                                      @iscarlosmolero @nixCraft Your reply doesn’t match the anti-AI sentiments on your bio, so I’m assuming you didn’t realize I was referring to Linus’ take.

                                      Read slower and be less of a jerk, thanks.

                                      iscarlosmolero@landofooo.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                      iscarlosmolero@landofooo.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                      iscarlosmolero@landofooo.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #45

                                      @jesse @nixCraft My apologies @phanpy UI got me tricked. But, in my defense, I would say that AI bros pushing this shit deserve all the hate they can get.

                                      The only problem is that you were not one of them.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • nixcraft@mastodon.socialN nixcraft@mastodon.social

                                        Linus Torvalds shares his thoughts on Anti-AI coding rules on Linux mailing list.

                                        https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=whTs09_ozN+e09GU68N1wPP56MUzDjrg9rnKxQUa0A_4Q@mail.gmail.com/

                                        He is doubling down on AI. This will come back to bite him. He thinks people using LLMs for coding are actually checking their work 😂 Code reviewers are just rubber stamping PRs. Nobody in their right mind can look at 100s of PRs per day &d manually go through them especially since they don't even know if they'll have a IT job left at the end of the day. It's a race to the bottom now

                                        tael@yiff.lifeT This user is from outside of this forum
                                        tael@yiff.lifeT This user is from outside of this forum
                                        tael@yiff.life
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #46

                                        @nixCraft What a dipshit. If you make a mistake while typing, YOU made the mistake. If the LLM makes a mistake generating code for you, you had nothing to do with it and no way to prevent it.

                                        If your compiler takes good code and introduces a bug, the compiler is bugged, and you can fix it. If the LLM takes your existing codebase and introduces a bug... no shit! What did you expect? There is nothing you can do to fix the LLM, because it's not broken. A compiler is deterministic (as is an editor), an LLM is stochastic. Two totally different categories of software.

                                        The people I respect and call intelligent do their own work and bear full responsibility for it. They have principles and care about quality, reliability, and correctness. They evaluate things on their merits and don't chase fads because they're "new and interesting."

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • prefec2@norden.socialP prefec2@norden.social

                                          @nixCraft AI code assistance is best for mondaine tasks, like boiler plate code, solutions used by many programmers, like the stuff you can find on stack exchange and friends. It is less useful for very mathematical issues. At least this is my impression. Most likely, Claude could create my Python code faster than I do, but I usually don't know what I want to build.

                                          I would love to see studies on how well these tools perform with code close to machine hardware.

                                          typhon@piaille.frT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          typhon@piaille.frT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          typhon@piaille.fr
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #47

                                          @prefec2 @nixCraft AI is best for tasks where quality doesn't matter, where the result doesn't matter.

                                          Which ideally should be none of them.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper