In history class, I never understood how “advanced” civilizations could collapse.
-
In history class, I never understood how “advanced” civilizations could collapse. It just didn’t seem plausible.
Anyway, I’ve seen enough. I get it now.
@Strandjunker
I've been feeling it for a while, but every time we've not all actually died in a fire, I keep thinking I must have been mistaken. -
In history class, I never understood how “advanced” civilizations could collapse. It just didn’t seem plausible.
Anyway, I’ve seen enough. I get it now.
@Strandjunker això deu funcionar com el capitalisme que avança i avança cap a l'abisme conscient que el camí que segueix va, precisament, cap a l'abisme però actua de l'única manera que sap i pot actuar. Només té aquestes instruccions i per sobreviure les ha de complir obligatòriament... sabent que això el destruirà.
-
In history class, I never understood how “advanced” civilizations could collapse. It just didn’t seem plausible.
Anyway, I’ve seen enough. I get it now.
@Strandjunker it's an empire and all empires are bound to fall.
-
In history class, I never understood how “advanced” civilizations could collapse. It just didn’t seem plausible.
Anyway, I’ve seen enough. I get it now.
@Strandjunker A profound disappointment in humanity.
When pain and injustice become commonplace in the eyes of the world, no amount of material progress can define true civilization. Civilization is built on humanity, not on money or technological advancement. 🥺
-
In history class, I never understood how “advanced” civilizations could collapse. It just didn’t seem plausible.
Anyway, I’ve seen enough. I get it now.
@Strandjunker no you have not, you need to watch it all!!!
ALL OF IT -
In history class, I never understood how “advanced” civilizations could collapse. It just didn’t seem plausible.
Anyway, I’ve seen enough. I get it now.
@Strandjunker but wait, there's more.
-
In history class, I never understood how “advanced” civilizations could collapse. It just didn’t seem plausible.
Anyway, I’ve seen enough. I get it now.
@Strandjunker Advanced is subjective.
When I look around at society I tend to doubt the enlightenment was ever a thing.
-
@Strandjunker advanced -> ad vance? cannot be good
@hendrikstier @Strandjunker where does the "d" go? His couch?
-
In history class, I never understood how “advanced” civilizations could collapse. It just didn’t seem plausible.
Anyway, I’ve seen enough. I get it now.
@Strandjunker Jared Diamond's 2005 'Collapse' book is much more readable than his 'Guns, Germs and Steel' and walks though some historical collapse scenarios. It has been over a decade since I read it so I'm sure the field has evolved and i might be misremembering, but the main gist I recall is there are too many rich people in advanced societies and too much pressure gets put on ecological systems that allowed the civ to succeed in the first place.
-
In history class, I never understood how “advanced” civilizations could collapse. It just didn’t seem plausible.
Anyway, I’ve seen enough. I get it now.
I read 700 pages of frickin Jacques Barzun for this‽
-
@hendrikstier @Strandjunker where does the "d" go? His couch?
@makja @Strandjunker stochastically…
-
In history class, I never understood how “advanced” civilizations could collapse. It just didn’t seem plausible.
Anyway, I’ve seen enough. I get it now.
@Strandjunker can't decide if the US government is currently being more or less ridiculous than the Romans appointing a horse to the Senate
-
In history class, I never understood how “advanced” civilizations could collapse. It just didn’t seem plausible.
Anyway, I’ve seen enough. I get it now.
-
In history class, I never understood how “advanced” civilizations could collapse. It just didn’t seem plausible.
Anyway, I’ve seen enough. I get it now.
Evil, greed, hate and stupidity for the perfect ingredients for it.... always have been...
-
@Strandjunker can't decide if the US government is currently being more or less ridiculous than the Romans appointing a horse to the Senate
@FishNamedDog @Strandjunker (leaving aside the reality of Inciatius' term in the Senate), Caligula was Emperor in the 30's AD; Alaric's sack of Rome wasn't until four centuries later.
Settle in for the long haul, is what I'm saying
-
@Strandjunker can't decide if the US government is currently being more or less ridiculous than the Romans appointing a horse to the Senate
@FishNamedDog @Strandjunker republicans are putting on a coup that superficially resembles a hapless clown show. Was the horse part of a coup attempt?
-
In history class, I never understood how “advanced” civilizations could collapse. It just didn’t seem plausible.
Anyway, I’ve seen enough. I get it now.
@Strandjunker but just imagine the value we’re creating for shareholders!
-
In history class, I never understood how “advanced” civilizations could collapse. It just didn’t seem plausible.
Anyway, I’ve seen enough. I get it now.
@Strandjunker It all feels like a house of cards, doesn't it?
-
In history class, I never understood how “advanced” civilizations could collapse. It just didn’t seem plausible.
Anyway, I’ve seen enough. I get it now.
@Strandjunker Those who don't learn from history...
-
@FishNamedDog @Strandjunker republicans are putting on a coup that superficially resembles a hapless clown show. Was the horse part of a coup attempt?
@TransitBiker@urbanists.social @FishNamedDog@mastodon.social @Strandjunker@mstdn.social More a way for the emperor to insult the senators, kinda like "You think you're the top of Rome, but you can't tell me what to do any more than this horse can!"
