Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • PopulΓ¦re
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. 🧐 #AMA on #emojis for #WorldEmojiDay ❗ #linguistics

🧐 #AMA on #emojis for #WorldEmojiDay ❗ #linguistics

Planlagt Fastgjort LΓ₯st Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
amaemojisworldemojidaylinguistics
45 Indlæg 15 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Γ†ldste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til Γ¦ldste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne trΓ₯d er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • tschfflr@fediscience.orgT tschfflr@fediscience.org

    It did all start with πŸ™‚ and 😞 and the start of these emoticons is widely credited to a bulletin board message by Scott Fahlmann in 1982 (where he suggested them as markers of joking or seriousness) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emoticon #emojis #linguistics #WorldEmojiDay

    katzentratschen@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
    katzentratschen@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
    katzentratschen@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #12

    @tschfflr I still miss the animated emoticons in GTalk aka Google Talk. Apart from yellowish bubble style and rectangle style emoticons, there were upright typeface style emoticons. You just typed e.g. }:-) and it tilted 90Β° to the right and its "horns" turned red.

    https://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2007/05/google-talk-gadget-with-emoticons.html?m=1

    katzentratschen@mastodon.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • tschfflr@fediscience.orgT tschfflr@fediscience.org

      @skyglowberlin "Can emojis be removed from Unicode? Or are they there forever once they are in?" - As of now, once they're in, they're in. The code point in Unicode is then reserved for this symbol. This can be a problem because emojis are kind of open-ended (other than alphabets and many other symbol lists). And it's possible that some emojis turn out to be rarely used. I could imagine that eventually some platforms just stop supporting a certain emoji - but it's really useful to have an international encoding standard which is fully supported by most technology (as anyone who has programmed or written online text in the early 2000s can attest). That's why getting a new emoji approved has become so hard - we're basically creating a kind of tech debt for a potentially long time.
      Funny story - you could try creating a post now with a Unicode character from an "empty" code point in the emoji range, in the hope that it will get assigned in a later round. I've seen such a post on the old Twitter, which later was filled with all kinds of random emojis, when you look at it in a few years. #linguistics #emojis #WorldEmojiDay

      tschfflr@fediscience.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
      tschfflr@fediscience.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
      tschfflr@fediscience.org
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #13

      πŸ€” Are #emojis a universal language? - No, for two reasons. 1) They are not a language, as they do not show the properties that human languages have: grammatical structure and free combinatorics, enabling us to express complex thoughts. 2) They are not really universal. While many emojis are interpreted similarly all over the world (I guess it's pretty clear what one could mean by πŸ• ), some emoji meanings are closely tied to cultural assumptions (e.g., some of the gestures πŸ‘ , buildings ⛩️ , food), and others are very context-dependent and might follow different conventions in various groups, including linguistic or regional groups (e.g., πŸ™ƒ for which we found strong differences between populations in Norway/US vs. Germany/Bulgaria). #WorldEmojiDay #linguistics

      tschfflr@fediscience.orgT 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • katzentratschen@mastodon.socialK katzentratschen@mastodon.social

        @tschfflr I still miss the animated emoticons in GTalk aka Google Talk. Apart from yellowish bubble style and rectangle style emoticons, there were upright typeface style emoticons. You just typed e.g. }:-) and it tilted 90Β° to the right and its "horns" turned red.

        https://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2007/05/google-talk-gadget-with-emoticons.html?m=1

        katzentratschen@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
        katzentratschen@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
        katzentratschen@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #14

        @tschfflr Sooo... This was a comment, not a question. What's your favourite emoticon or emoji and why?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • tschfflr@fediscience.orgT tschfflr@fediscience.org

          🧐 #AMA on #emojis for #WorldEmojiDay ❗ #linguistics

          beandreams@friendhole.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          beandreams@friendhole.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          beandreams@friendhole.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #15

          @tschfflr I am often curious: which emojis are used the least often?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • tschfflr@fediscience.orgT tschfflr@fediscience.org

            πŸ€” Are #emojis a universal language? - No, for two reasons. 1) They are not a language, as they do not show the properties that human languages have: grammatical structure and free combinatorics, enabling us to express complex thoughts. 2) They are not really universal. While many emojis are interpreted similarly all over the world (I guess it's pretty clear what one could mean by πŸ• ), some emoji meanings are closely tied to cultural assumptions (e.g., some of the gestures πŸ‘ , buildings ⛩️ , food), and others are very context-dependent and might follow different conventions in various groups, including linguistic or regional groups (e.g., πŸ™ƒ for which we found strong differences between populations in Norway/US vs. Germany/Bulgaria). #WorldEmojiDay #linguistics

            tschfflr@fediscience.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
            tschfflr@fediscience.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
            tschfflr@fediscience.org
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #16

            "what are the two readings of πŸ™ƒ?" - Roughly, one group sees this emoji as a whimsical, funny alternative to the "regular" smiley πŸ™‚ , which they also read as positive ("happy, smiling"). The other group sees it as sarcastic, passive-aggressive, or uncomfortable. There are many nuances but those are the two groups. #emojis #WorldEmojiDay #linguistics

            tschfflr@fediscience.orgT 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • tschfflr@fediscience.orgT tschfflr@fediscience.org

              "what are the two readings of πŸ™ƒ?" - Roughly, one group sees this emoji as a whimsical, funny alternative to the "regular" smiley πŸ™‚ , which they also read as positive ("happy, smiling"). The other group sees it as sarcastic, passive-aggressive, or uncomfortable. There are many nuances but those are the two groups. #emojis #WorldEmojiDay #linguistics

              tschfflr@fediscience.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
              tschfflr@fediscience.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
              tschfflr@fediscience.org
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #17

              "which emojis are used the least often?" - Great question, and we rarely find data on this! But luckily, we studied this at least for two corpora with German users (and admittedly only for face emojis). So: Many object or symbol emojis (from the "tail end" of the emoji list) are very, very rarely used. Overall, faces and hearts are the most frequent. Among the face emojis, we compiled the full list of usages from a huge Twitter corpus (semi-public communication, 2014-2022) and a much small WhatsApp chat corpus (private or group communication). You can find the frequencies in this table linked below (and sort by frequency by clicking on the column). The least frequent face emoji in the large corpus was the "frowning face with open mouth" 😦, which most people have never seen before. Personally, I think it's pretty ambiguous and not very useful, as there are better emojis for anything it might express. #emojis #linguistics #WorldEmojiDay
              https://tscheffler.github.io/2024-Face-Emoji-Norming/ratings.html

              kuchenschwarte@fnordon.deK tschfflr@fediscience.orgT lappenjammerdiezweite@social.vivaldi.netL 3 Replies Last reply
              0
              • tschfflr@fediscience.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                tschfflr@fediscience.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                tschfflr@fediscience.org
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #18

                @ricci ❀

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • tschfflr@fediscience.orgT tschfflr@fediscience.org

                  "which emojis are used the least often?" - Great question, and we rarely find data on this! But luckily, we studied this at least for two corpora with German users (and admittedly only for face emojis). So: Many object or symbol emojis (from the "tail end" of the emoji list) are very, very rarely used. Overall, faces and hearts are the most frequent. Among the face emojis, we compiled the full list of usages from a huge Twitter corpus (semi-public communication, 2014-2022) and a much small WhatsApp chat corpus (private or group communication). You can find the frequencies in this table linked below (and sort by frequency by clicking on the column). The least frequent face emoji in the large corpus was the "frowning face with open mouth" 😦, which most people have never seen before. Personally, I think it's pretty ambiguous and not very useful, as there are better emojis for anything it might express. #emojis #linguistics #WorldEmojiDay
                  https://tscheffler.github.io/2024-Face-Emoji-Norming/ratings.html

                  kuchenschwarte@fnordon.deK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kuchenschwarte@fnordon.deK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kuchenschwarte@fnordon.de
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #19

                  @tschfflr what about double meanings like in πŸ†πŸ₯¦ and πŸ‘?

                  kuchenschwarte@fnordon.deK 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • tschfflr@fediscience.orgT tschfflr@fediscience.org

                    @Kuchenschwarte "Why are emojis standardly not animated?" - a complicated question. The Unicode standard lists a code point for each emoji (and other symbols, too), as well as, roughly, its meaning (really a short name). You can see the full list below. E.g., codepoint "U+1F601" corresponds to "beaming face with smiling eyes" or 😁 .
                    You can think of the look of that emoji on your individual platform as a kind of "font" - the platforms are free to implement the look of each emoji according to their house style. This is similar to the character "A" looking different in different newspapers, platforms, or styles. In most Western platforms emojis so far are not animated. But in many widely used Chinese platforms (WeChat and especially Weibo, for example), many emojis are animated. So I guess it's a question of style. #emojis #linguistics #WorldEmojiDay

                    https://unicode.org/emoji/charts/full-emoji-list.html

                    jasonkarns@indieweb.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jasonkarns@indieweb.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jasonkarns@indieweb.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #20

                    @tschfflr @skyglowberlin @Kuchenschwarte I wonder if having animated versions could be like changing fonts ?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • tschfflr@fediscience.orgT tschfflr@fediscience.org

                      "which emojis are used the least often?" - Great question, and we rarely find data on this! But luckily, we studied this at least for two corpora with German users (and admittedly only for face emojis). So: Many object or symbol emojis (from the "tail end" of the emoji list) are very, very rarely used. Overall, faces and hearts are the most frequent. Among the face emojis, we compiled the full list of usages from a huge Twitter corpus (semi-public communication, 2014-2022) and a much small WhatsApp chat corpus (private or group communication). You can find the frequencies in this table linked below (and sort by frequency by clicking on the column). The least frequent face emoji in the large corpus was the "frowning face with open mouth" 😦, which most people have never seen before. Personally, I think it's pretty ambiguous and not very useful, as there are better emojis for anything it might express. #emojis #linguistics #WorldEmojiDay
                      https://tscheffler.github.io/2024-Face-Emoji-Norming/ratings.html

                      tschfflr@fediscience.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                      tschfflr@fediscience.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                      tschfflr@fediscience.org
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #21

                      "what about double meanings like in πŸ†πŸ₯¦ and πŸ‘?" - Ah yes, these ambiguities are very famous. In order to get a new emoji approved nowadays, it's even helpful to be able to point out additional meanings and usages that are metaphorical in this way. The Unicode consortium is wary of introducing too many new emojis, and so those that can "carry more weight" and fill many needs at once are preferred.
                      In internet corpora the vegetable-related uses of these emojis are probably quite rare (but I must admit I haven't checked yet) - and the metaphorical meanings probably dominate. Though there are also many insider uses of emojis that aren't super widely known outside of their circle. This is comparable to other kinds of linguistic codes or innovations (e.g. in youth language) and not limited to only emojis. #WorldEmojiDay #emojis #linguistics

                      vicgrinberg@mastodon.socialV tschfflr@fediscience.orgT 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • tschfflr@fediscience.orgT tschfflr@fediscience.org

                        "which emojis are used the least often?" - Great question, and we rarely find data on this! But luckily, we studied this at least for two corpora with German users (and admittedly only for face emojis). So: Many object or symbol emojis (from the "tail end" of the emoji list) are very, very rarely used. Overall, faces and hearts are the most frequent. Among the face emojis, we compiled the full list of usages from a huge Twitter corpus (semi-public communication, 2014-2022) and a much small WhatsApp chat corpus (private or group communication). You can find the frequencies in this table linked below (and sort by frequency by clicking on the column). The least frequent face emoji in the large corpus was the "frowning face with open mouth" 😦, which most people have never seen before. Personally, I think it's pretty ambiguous and not very useful, as there are better emojis for anything it might express. #emojis #linguistics #WorldEmojiDay
                        https://tscheffler.github.io/2024-Face-Emoji-Norming/ratings.html

                        lappenjammerdiezweite@social.vivaldi.netL This user is from outside of this forum
                        lappenjammerdiezweite@social.vivaldi.netL This user is from outside of this forum
                        lappenjammerdiezweite@social.vivaldi.net
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #22

                        @tschfflr Can I say that in the olden days of ye twitter there was an account featuring the least used emojis? And of course there were people trying to upvote their favourites. I admit I always supported the cable car emoji (whimsical )

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • tschfflr@fediscience.orgT tschfflr@fediscience.org

                          "what about double meanings like in πŸ†πŸ₯¦ and πŸ‘?" - Ah yes, these ambiguities are very famous. In order to get a new emoji approved nowadays, it's even helpful to be able to point out additional meanings and usages that are metaphorical in this way. The Unicode consortium is wary of introducing too many new emojis, and so those that can "carry more weight" and fill many needs at once are preferred.
                          In internet corpora the vegetable-related uses of these emojis are probably quite rare (but I must admit I haven't checked yet) - and the metaphorical meanings probably dominate. Though there are also many insider uses of emojis that aren't super widely known outside of their circle. This is comparable to other kinds of linguistic codes or innovations (e.g. in youth language) and not limited to only emojis. #WorldEmojiDay #emojis #linguistics

                          vicgrinberg@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                          vicgrinberg@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                          vicgrinberg@mastodon.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #23

                          @tschfflr thanks for doing this, all this us super interesting!

                          Do you know of any unexpected pattern of emoji usage? For example I'd expect younger folks to use emoji more than older folks and private communication to use it more than business... But maybe my assumptions are wrong or there is something else interesting?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • tschfflr@fediscience.orgT tschfflr@fediscience.org

                            "what about double meanings like in πŸ†πŸ₯¦ and πŸ‘?" - Ah yes, these ambiguities are very famous. In order to get a new emoji approved nowadays, it's even helpful to be able to point out additional meanings and usages that are metaphorical in this way. The Unicode consortium is wary of introducing too many new emojis, and so those that can "carry more weight" and fill many needs at once are preferred.
                            In internet corpora the vegetable-related uses of these emojis are probably quite rare (but I must admit I haven't checked yet) - and the metaphorical meanings probably dominate. Though there are also many insider uses of emojis that aren't super widely known outside of their circle. This is comparable to other kinds of linguistic codes or innovations (e.g. in youth language) and not limited to only emojis. #WorldEmojiDay #emojis #linguistics

                            tschfflr@fediscience.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                            tschfflr@fediscience.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                            tschfflr@fediscience.org
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #24

                            Do young and old people interpret (or use) emojis differently? - Yes, to some extent. Actually with most emojis we see a huge overlap in interpretation and also use. But there are some frequent emojis which are, on average, interpreted differently by older and younger people in our studies. For example, the slighly smiling face πŸ™‚ and its upside down variant πŸ™ƒ are seen as more positive by older participants, while the little dot-eyes are seen as cold and not authentic ("psychopath eyes") by younger people. Similarly, the winking smiley πŸ˜‰ is used by the older group to mark any jokes or fun (similarly to the original πŸ˜‰ emoticon), and younger people find it often completely inappropriate and sexually suggestive #emojis #WorldEmojiDay #linguistics

                            tschfflr@fediscience.orgT 1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            0
                            • tschfflr@fediscience.orgT tschfflr@fediscience.org

                              🧐 #AMA on #emojis for #WorldEmojiDay ❗ #linguistics

                              lappenjammerdiezweite@social.vivaldi.netL This user is from outside of this forum
                              lappenjammerdiezweite@social.vivaldi.netL This user is from outside of this forum
                              lappenjammerdiezweite@social.vivaldi.net
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #25

                              @tschfflr So many questions but I first need time to read your excellent posts.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • tschfflr@fediscience.orgT tschfflr@fediscience.org

                                Do young and old people interpret (or use) emojis differently? - Yes, to some extent. Actually with most emojis we see a huge overlap in interpretation and also use. But there are some frequent emojis which are, on average, interpreted differently by older and younger people in our studies. For example, the slighly smiling face πŸ™‚ and its upside down variant πŸ™ƒ are seen as more positive by older participants, while the little dot-eyes are seen as cold and not authentic ("psychopath eyes") by younger people. Similarly, the winking smiley πŸ˜‰ is used by the older group to mark any jokes or fun (similarly to the original πŸ˜‰ emoticon), and younger people find it often completely inappropriate and sexually suggestive #emojis #WorldEmojiDay #linguistics

                                tschfflr@fediscience.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                                tschfflr@fediscience.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                                tschfflr@fediscience.org
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #26

                                "Do you know of any unexpected pattern of emoji usage? For example I'd expect younger folks to use emoji more than older folks and private communication to use it more than business... But maybe my assumptions are wrong or there is something else interesting?" - Yes generally our studies show that younger ppl use emojis more than older (and women a bit more than men). But in class with my undergraduates, they recently often tell me "I don't use emojis at all". I must say I don't fully believe them (maybe they don't even notice all the little hearts anymore?) and I haven't been able to show this in studies, but it's an interesting anecdotal data point I'd like to know more about!
                                Also, a student of mine recently asked teenagers (13 and 16yos) about their emoji interpretations. And surprisingly to us, these almost entirely match the data we already have for adults. Even for some like πŸ™ƒ and πŸ˜‰ that I thought were changing (and just told you that younger people see them differently 😬). So that was a bit weird to me πŸ˜… #emojis #WorldEmojiDay #linguistics

                                vicgrinberg@mastodon.socialV tschfflr@fediscience.orgT 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • tschfflr@fediscience.orgT tschfflr@fediscience.org

                                  "Do you know of any unexpected pattern of emoji usage? For example I'd expect younger folks to use emoji more than older folks and private communication to use it more than business... But maybe my assumptions are wrong or there is something else interesting?" - Yes generally our studies show that younger ppl use emojis more than older (and women a bit more than men). But in class with my undergraduates, they recently often tell me "I don't use emojis at all". I must say I don't fully believe them (maybe they don't even notice all the little hearts anymore?) and I haven't been able to show this in studies, but it's an interesting anecdotal data point I'd like to know more about!
                                  Also, a student of mine recently asked teenagers (13 and 16yos) about their emoji interpretations. And surprisingly to us, these almost entirely match the data we already have for adults. Even for some like πŸ™ƒ and πŸ˜‰ that I thought were changing (and just told you that younger people see them differently 😬). So that was a bit weird to me πŸ˜… #emojis #WorldEmojiDay #linguistics

                                  vicgrinberg@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                                  vicgrinberg@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                                  vicgrinberg@mastodon.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #27

                                  @tschfflr thank you πŸ’š

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • tschfflr@fediscience.orgT tschfflr@fediscience.org

                                    "Do you know of any unexpected pattern of emoji usage? For example I'd expect younger folks to use emoji more than older folks and private communication to use it more than business... But maybe my assumptions are wrong or there is something else interesting?" - Yes generally our studies show that younger ppl use emojis more than older (and women a bit more than men). But in class with my undergraduates, they recently often tell me "I don't use emojis at all". I must say I don't fully believe them (maybe they don't even notice all the little hearts anymore?) and I haven't been able to show this in studies, but it's an interesting anecdotal data point I'd like to know more about!
                                    Also, a student of mine recently asked teenagers (13 and 16yos) about their emoji interpretations. And surprisingly to us, these almost entirely match the data we already have for adults. Even for some like πŸ™ƒ and πŸ˜‰ that I thought were changing (and just told you that younger people see them differently 😬). So that was a bit weird to me πŸ˜… #emojis #WorldEmojiDay #linguistics

                                    tschfflr@fediscience.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    tschfflr@fediscience.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    tschfflr@fediscience.org
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #28

                                    Does being an emoji researcher make me more wary to use them - like am I watching my emoji use all the time? - I'd say the opposite is true, I feel more free and whimsical in using emojis, as I see them all the time in different contexts, and I can easily pretend to just use them ironically or "for work" 🀩 #emojis #linguistics #worldEmojiDay

                                    tschfflr@fediscience.orgT 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • kuchenschwarte@fnordon.deK kuchenschwarte@fnordon.de

                                      @tschfflr what about double meanings like in πŸ†πŸ₯¦ and πŸ‘?

                                      kuchenschwarte@fnordon.deK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      kuchenschwarte@fnordon.deK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      kuchenschwarte@fnordon.de
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #29

                                      @tschfflr or probably one meaning - but not exactly the one intended... πŸ˜…

                                      tschfflr@fediscience.orgT 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • kuchenschwarte@fnordon.deK kuchenschwarte@fnordon.de

                                        @tschfflr or probably one meaning - but not exactly the one intended... πŸ˜…

                                        tschfflr@fediscience.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                                        tschfflr@fediscience.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                                        tschfflr@fediscience.org
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #30

                                        @Kuchenschwarte 🀭

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • tschfflr@fediscience.orgT tschfflr@fediscience.org

                                          🧐 #AMA on #emojis for #WorldEmojiDay ❗ #linguistics

                                          jollysea@chaos.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          jollysea@chaos.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          jollysea@chaos.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #31

                                          @tschfflr is there (still) a lot of use of "signage" emojis like πŸͺ or even more abstract πŸ›…?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Γ†ldste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til Γ¦ldste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • PopulΓ¦re
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper