Was just reminded that the last paper rejection I got included a reviewer comment: "too much psychology for a software engineer audience."
-
Was just reminded that the last paper rejection I got included a reviewer comment: "too much psychology for a software engineer audience."
Feels like it should maybe be a new bio quote
it's absolutely true of me. It's absolutely true.@grimalkina Imagine if we had more psychology in software engineering… that would solve so many issues.
-
Was just reminded that the last paper rejection I got included a reviewer comment: "too much psychology for a software engineer audience."
Feels like it should maybe be a new bio quote
it's absolutely true of me. It's absolutely true.Me @ the academics though: YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOW MUCH PSYCHOLOGY IS BEING BEAMED DIRECTLY INTO MY SKULL IN EVERY TECH CONVERSATION. YOU HAVE NO IDEA. IT IS ACTUALLY TOO MUCH PSYCHOLOGY FOR A PSYCHOLOGIST. I THINK THE SOFTWARE ENGINEERS HAVE A HIGHER TOLERANCE THAN I DO
-
Me @ the academics though: YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOW MUCH PSYCHOLOGY IS BEING BEAMED DIRECTLY INTO MY SKULL IN EVERY TECH CONVERSATION. YOU HAVE NO IDEA. IT IS ACTUALLY TOO MUCH PSYCHOLOGY FOR A PSYCHOLOGIST. I THINK THE SOFTWARE ENGINEERS HAVE A HIGHER TOLERANCE THAN I DO
Journal review idea: you come with me to a tech conference and listen to just one hour of my personal hallway track then we'll see what work you think matters!!!!!!!!
-
Journal review idea: you come with me to a tech conference and listen to just one hour of my personal hallway track then we'll see what work you think matters!!!!!!!!
Literally have to teach myself new little tech things just to give my mind a BREAK from being a psychologist
-
Was just reminded that the last paper rejection I got included a reviewer comment: "too much psychology for a software engineer audience."
Feels like it should maybe be a new bio quote
it's absolutely true of me. It's absolutely true.@grimalkina oh lord
️️️️️ -
Literally have to teach myself new little tech things just to give my mind a BREAK from being a psychologist
Tolerance can also be an inability to recognise.
-
Was just reminded that the last paper rejection I got included a reviewer comment: "too much psychology for a software engineer audience."
Feels like it should maybe be a new bio quote
it's absolutely true of me. It's absolutely true.@grimalkina As a Software Engineer I am offended, I've already had to be confused by networking, FinTech and genetics in my career, why should I be denied being confused by psychology, too?
-
Was just reminded that the last paper rejection I got included a reviewer comment: "too much psychology for a software engineer audience."
Feels like it should maybe be a new bio quote
it's absolutely true of me. It's absolutely true. -
Tolerance can also be an inability to recognise.
@KingmaYpe that's true....I do think there's a lot of distress overtolerance in tech
-
Was just reminded that the last paper rejection I got included a reviewer comment: "too much psychology for a software engineer audience."
Feels like it should maybe be a new bio quote
it's absolutely true of me. It's absolutely true."too phycho for tech"
-
@grimalkina Imagine if we had more psychology in software engineering… that would solve so many issues.
One of the problems that would be solved is website usability, as that requires some knowledge of the human mind.
I recently wrote about that in this article:
(Link posted with @grimalkina's permission.)
-
@grimalkina Imagine if we had more psychology in software engineering… that would solve so many issues.
@mahryekuh @grimalkina You say that, but there’s a lot is psychology in certain game companies and it’s used for a lot of evil.
-
@mahryekuh @grimalkina You say that, but there’s a lot is psychology in certain game companies and it’s used for a lot of evil.
@ainmosni @grimalkina Do you mean addictive patterns?
Because I didn't even think about that, but that's definitely a real problem.
Same with addictive social media timelines.
Guess Big Tech is better at using psychology for evil than for good?
-
Was just reminded that the last paper rejection I got included a reviewer comment: "too much psychology for a software engineer audience."
Feels like it should maybe be a new bio quote
it's absolutely true of me. It's absolutely true.@grimalkina Maybe the stuff is too good for the journals.
-
@grimalkina Maybe the stuff is too good for the journals.
@chemoelectric backalley open access preprints you can quietly give your friends is where my best work is, truly. I think the highest quality work and writing I've done is contained in these preprints
-
Was just reminded that the last paper rejection I got included a reviewer comment: "too much psychology for a software engineer audience."
Feels like it should maybe be a new bio quote
it's absolutely true of me. It's absolutely true.@grimalkina “Please do not bring introspection to this audience. They do not want to think about the ramifications of their work.”
-
Was just reminded that the last paper rejection I got included a reviewer comment: "too much psychology for a software engineer audience."
Feels like it should maybe be a new bio quote
it's absolutely true of me. It's absolutely true.@grimalkina
I suppose I spent many years thinking software dev was pure tech. I was quite mistaken .... and still prefer the tech bits. -
@chemoelectric backalley open access preprints you can quietly give your friends is where my best work is, truly. I think the highest quality work and writing I've done is contained in these preprints
@grimalkina In fundamental physics you cannot find quality stuff at all in the ‘elite’ journals. There they publish only utter nonsense.
(I’m not a physicist, thank goodness. A retired computer programmer with an engineering education, but who dabbles in a few physics topics without publishing except from a soapbox. But I do subscribe to the ACM Digital Library!)
-
@grimalkina In fundamental physics you cannot find quality stuff at all in the ‘elite’ journals. There they publish only utter nonsense.
(I’m not a physicist, thank goodness. A retired computer programmer with an engineering education, but who dabbles in a few physics topics without publishing except from a soapbox. But I do subscribe to the ACM Digital Library!)
@grimalkina I write code. I lace my code and READMEs with ‘psychological’ commentary. Lately it has been stuff about how, no, it is not R⁷RS Scheme that is reactionary, it is R⁶RS Scheme that was reactionary, because it rejected the SRFIs. I actually stick this stuff in my libraries because I think it explains a lot.
-
Was just reminded that the last paper rejection I got included a reviewer comment: "too much psychology for a software engineer audience."
Feels like it should maybe be a new bio quote
it's absolutely true of me. It's absolutely true.@grimalkina (remind me to encourage you to come to #NBPy next year
)
