Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. “Courage is knowing it might hurt & doing it anyway.

“Courage is knowing it might hurt & doing it anyway.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
25 Indlæg 11 Posters 1 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • dahukanna@mastodon.socialD dahukanna@mastodon.social

    Related courage or ignorance (stupidity)? - https://mastodon.social/@dahukanna/116861171075473735.
    Surprised that air composition and circulation flow or the lack of it, affects the organic and embodied human brain.

    mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
    mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
    mhoye@cosocial.ca
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #4

    @dahukanna This kind of thing drives me nuts, particularly given how often it emerges from the techbro lifehack hyperoptimizer quadrant. REVEALED: Your Brain Is Not Actually A Computer In A Jar, The Implications Of This Will SHOCK YOU

    my guy, just... just take a five minute break from turning soylent into javascript and walk to a tree

    mhoye@cosocial.caM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

      @dahukanna This kind of thing drives me nuts, particularly given how often it emerges from the techbro lifehack hyperoptimizer quadrant. REVEALED: Your Brain Is Not Actually A Computer In A Jar, The Implications Of This Will SHOCK YOU

      my guy, just... just take a five minute break from turning soylent into javascript and walk to a tree

      mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
      mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
      mhoye@cosocial.ca
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #5

      @dahukanna This is one of @grimalkina's hobbyhorses, and I could listen to her talk about it all day. "It is with a heavy heart that I am obligated to inform you that your brain is being carried from one meeting to another by your body, and that body eats and breathes and - hold onto your pants here - that body exists in both a society and the world."

      dahukanna@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

        @dahukanna This is one of @grimalkina's hobbyhorses, and I could listen to her talk about it all day. "It is with a heavy heart that I am obligated to inform you that your brain is being carried from one meeting to another by your body, and that body eats and breathes and - hold onto your pants here - that body exists in both a society and the world."

        dahukanna@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
        dahukanna@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
        dahukanna@mastodon.social
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #6

        @mhoye @grimalkina
        🤷🏾‍♀️🤦🏾‍♀️!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • dahukanna@mastodon.socialD dahukanna@mastodon.social

          Related courage or stupidity? - https://toot.cafe/@baldur/116860922240961497

          ‘as AI companies are starting to charge based on token-usage not simply a flat subscription, many of their customers are shocked at the bill. "Companies are scrambling to stop spending so much on AI," as 404 Media reports.-https://www.404media.co/the-tokenpocalypse-is-here-companies-are-scrambling-to-stop-spending-so-much-on-ai/

          These are businesses that moved fixed-cost to variable-subscription- cost and are “surprised” they can no longer afford essential service price increase. What did they think would happen?

          dahukanna@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
          dahukanna@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
          dahukanna@mastodon.social
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #7

          Related - https://infosec.exchange/@briankrebs/116896277399131257

          “Doesn’t take a genius to figure out that lots of companies smarting from increasing costs of AI tokens might start to look for cheaper alternatives, and that those alternatives increasingly are going to come from our adversaries.”

          …

          "Cursor, which will be acquired by Elon Musk's SpaceX for $60 billion, built its Composer 2 model using Chinese AI model Kimi, which was developed by Moonshot AI."

          https://www.cnbc.com/2026/07/08/chinese-ai-models-probe-us-lawmakers.html

          dahukanna@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • dahukanna@mastodon.socialD dahukanna@mastodon.social

            Related - https://infosec.exchange/@briankrebs/116896277399131257

            “Doesn’t take a genius to figure out that lots of companies smarting from increasing costs of AI tokens might start to look for cheaper alternatives, and that those alternatives increasingly are going to come from our adversaries.”

            …

            "Cursor, which will be acquired by Elon Musk's SpaceX for $60 billion, built its Composer 2 model using Chinese AI model Kimi, which was developed by Moonshot AI."

            https://www.cnbc.com/2026/07/08/chinese-ai-models-probe-us-lawmakers.html

            dahukanna@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
            dahukanna@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
            dahukanna@mastodon.social
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #8

            Related - https://flipboard.com/@futurism/future-society-q9o43qrjz/-/a-t_vHFkmNSpyeK7HvheAfUw%3Aa%3A1737388686-%2F0

            “AI Is Pushing Older Employees Straight Out of the Workforce, New Report Finds
            https://futurism.com/future-society/ai-pushing-workers-retirement-older-labor-automation?utm_source=flipboard&utm_medium=activitypub
            Posted into Future Society @future-society-Futurism”

            dahukanna@mastodon.socialD 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • dahukanna@mastodon.socialD dahukanna@mastodon.social

              Related - https://flipboard.com/@futurism/future-society-q9o43qrjz/-/a-t_vHFkmNSpyeK7HvheAfUw%3Aa%3A1737388686-%2F0

              “AI Is Pushing Older Employees Straight Out of the Workforce, New Report Finds
              https://futurism.com/future-society/ai-pushing-workers-retirement-older-labor-automation?utm_source=flipboard&utm_medium=activitypub
              Posted into Future Society @future-society-Futurism”

              dahukanna@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
              dahukanna@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
              dahukanna@mastodon.social
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #9

              Related - https://hachyderm.io/@mweagle/116898915360905510

              “Key takeaways:
              - Mid-level engineers are subsidizing everyone else’s AI productivity – and burning out for it.
              - The warning signs are there if you look closely: the invisible validator problem is probably already in motion.
              - The ‘fix’ is making oversight explicit. The engineers burning out today were meant to become your senior leaders tomorrow.” - https://leaddev.com/ai/ai-productivity-is-burning-out-your-best-engineers

              dahukanna@mastodon.socialD mspcommentary@mastodon.onlineM 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • dahukanna@mastodon.socialD dahukanna@mastodon.social

                Related - https://hachyderm.io/@mweagle/116898915360905510

                “Key takeaways:
                - Mid-level engineers are subsidizing everyone else’s AI productivity – and burning out for it.
                - The warning signs are there if you look closely: the invisible validator problem is probably already in motion.
                - The ‘fix’ is making oversight explicit. The engineers burning out today were meant to become your senior leaders tomorrow.” - https://leaddev.com/ai/ai-productivity-is-burning-out-your-best-engineers

                dahukanna@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                dahukanna@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                dahukanna@mastodon.social
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #10

                So the AI business “model” is:
                1. NOT HIRING 📉 juniors to create human candidates for the specialists & experts with work experience.
                2. BURNING OUT ☢️ mid-level engineers, hardware (prices rising), infrastructure consumed unsustainably (water & electricity) to make everyone “addicted” to AI-LLM word & sentence calculator.
                3. PUSHING OUT 📉 experienced senior-level engineers who advise & set tech strategy for “the business”.

                This is the “Kodak” & “Boeing” business downfall case studies combined.

                kevinrns@mstdn.socialK flipperpa@fosstodon.orgF undead@masto.hackers.townU thalia@discuss.systemsT bytebro@mastodonapp.ukB 9 Replies Last reply
                2
                0
                • dahukanna@mastodon.socialD dahukanna@mastodon.social

                  Related - https://hachyderm.io/@mweagle/116898915360905510

                  “Key takeaways:
                  - Mid-level engineers are subsidizing everyone else’s AI productivity – and burning out for it.
                  - The warning signs are there if you look closely: the invisible validator problem is probably already in motion.
                  - The ‘fix’ is making oversight explicit. The engineers burning out today were meant to become your senior leaders tomorrow.” - https://leaddev.com/ai/ai-productivity-is-burning-out-your-best-engineers

                  mspcommentary@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mspcommentary@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mspcommentary@mastodon.online
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #11

                  @dahukanna the DORA report showed that, while well-organized teams can benefit from AI, AI on top of poor processes has a negative outcome.

                  This statement: "When I looked back at her sprint that week, she had zero points to show for it.", contains enough red flags to be sure that this manager is in the second category.

                  Of course, businesses with poor processes are likely to reach for AI because it seems to offer an easy fix.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • dahukanna@mastodon.socialD dahukanna@mastodon.social

                    So the AI business “model” is:
                    1. NOT HIRING 📉 juniors to create human candidates for the specialists & experts with work experience.
                    2. BURNING OUT ☢️ mid-level engineers, hardware (prices rising), infrastructure consumed unsustainably (water & electricity) to make everyone “addicted” to AI-LLM word & sentence calculator.
                    3. PUSHING OUT 📉 experienced senior-level engineers who advise & set tech strategy for “the business”.

                    This is the “Kodak” & “Boeing” business downfall case studies combined.

                    kevinrns@mstdn.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kevinrns@mstdn.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                    kevinrns@mstdn.social
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #12

                    @dahukanna

                    AI is going to Kodak America.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • dahukanna@mastodon.socialD dahukanna@mastodon.social

                      So the AI business “model” is:
                      1. NOT HIRING 📉 juniors to create human candidates for the specialists & experts with work experience.
                      2. BURNING OUT ☢️ mid-level engineers, hardware (prices rising), infrastructure consumed unsustainably (water & electricity) to make everyone “addicted” to AI-LLM word & sentence calculator.
                      3. PUSHING OUT 📉 experienced senior-level engineers who advise & set tech strategy for “the business”.

                      This is the “Kodak” & “Boeing” business downfall case studies combined.

                      flipperpa@fosstodon.orgF This user is from outside of this forum
                      flipperpa@fosstodon.orgF This user is from outside of this forum
                      flipperpa@fosstodon.org
                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                      #13

                      @dahukanna Here’s a piece I wrote. I was considering Boeing and Kodak as candidates but planes falling out of the sky seemed harsh to make a point. https://technical.ly/company-culture/sony-intel-leadership-tech-decline-guest-post/

                      dahukanna@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • flipperpa@fosstodon.orgF flipperpa@fosstodon.org

                        @dahukanna Here’s a piece I wrote. I was considering Boeing and Kodak as candidates but planes falling out of the sky seemed harsh to make a point. https://technical.ly/company-culture/sony-intel-leadership-tech-decline-guest-post/

                        dahukanna@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                        dahukanna@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                        dahukanna@mastodon.social
                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                        #14

                        @FlipperPA ultimately, these narratives are about consequences of balancing short-, mid- & long-term decisions.

                        The Boeing “set of short-term avarice decisions” was decades in the making & only “grabbed attention” when planes & their components started falling out the sky with paying passengers onboard. Intel & Kodak also avarice-driven. “Avarice” is not a business purpose.

                        With AI-LLM consequences, do we wait until “humans” are literally falling out of:
                        1. the sky
                        2. their minds
                        3. employment

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        0
                        • dahukanna@mastodon.socialD dahukanna@mastodon.social

                          So the AI business “model” is:
                          1. NOT HIRING 📉 juniors to create human candidates for the specialists & experts with work experience.
                          2. BURNING OUT ☢️ mid-level engineers, hardware (prices rising), infrastructure consumed unsustainably (water & electricity) to make everyone “addicted” to AI-LLM word & sentence calculator.
                          3. PUSHING OUT 📉 experienced senior-level engineers who advise & set tech strategy for “the business”.

                          This is the “Kodak” & “Boeing” business downfall case studies combined.

                          undead@masto.hackers.townU This user is from outside of this forum
                          undead@masto.hackers.townU This user is from outside of this forum
                          undead@masto.hackers.town
                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                          #15

                          @dahukanna

                          At some point, every practice goes through a point where outside senior management thinks they know everything about how the sausage is made.

                          And they don't. And that business, practice or industry inevitably collapses because every small failure along the way was ignored by people who told themselves they knew better and didn't have to listen to people who actually understood their jobs.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • dahukanna@mastodon.socialD dahukanna@mastodon.social

                            So the AI business “model” is:
                            1. NOT HIRING 📉 juniors to create human candidates for the specialists & experts with work experience.
                            2. BURNING OUT ☢️ mid-level engineers, hardware (prices rising), infrastructure consumed unsustainably (water & electricity) to make everyone “addicted” to AI-LLM word & sentence calculator.
                            3. PUSHING OUT 📉 experienced senior-level engineers who advise & set tech strategy for “the business”.

                            This is the “Kodak” & “Boeing” business downfall case studies combined.

                            thalia@discuss.systemsT This user is from outside of this forum
                            thalia@discuss.systemsT This user is from outside of this forum
                            thalia@discuss.systems
                            wrote on sidst redigeret af
                            #16

                            @dahukanna I'm less familiar with these business case studies, so I did some reading. Kodak's downfall was from not embracing digital photography, despite producing the first digital camera. Boeing's ruination is from lax quality control due to outsourcing and cutting costs.

                            So the connection you're making to LLM companies is that, despite bringing the technology to the masses, they're falling behind cheaper competitors. And that companies that don't manage quality control in their LLM use, the default state of affairs, are suffering due to mid-level engineer burnout. It's like the Boeing case, but with the effects directed outwards to customers. Is that it?

                            dahukanna@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic on
                            • thalia@discuss.systemsT thalia@discuss.systems

                              @dahukanna I'm less familiar with these business case studies, so I did some reading. Kodak's downfall was from not embracing digital photography, despite producing the first digital camera. Boeing's ruination is from lax quality control due to outsourcing and cutting costs.

                              So the connection you're making to LLM companies is that, despite bringing the technology to the masses, they're falling behind cheaper competitors. And that companies that don't manage quality control in their LLM use, the default state of affairs, are suffering due to mid-level engineer burnout. It's like the Boeing case, but with the effects directed outwards to customers. Is that it?

                              dahukanna@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                              dahukanna@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                              dahukanna@mastodon.social
                              wrote on sidst redigeret af
                              #17

                              @thalia there’s thesis written about the 2 case studies.
                              I’ve < 500 chars to illustrate avarice-based human decisions or “shareholder value”.
                              Kodak (incumbent market leader, IML) execs decided not to move into digital media. When ppl stopped using film commercially & personally, their business purpose “disappeared” & so did the company.
                              Boeing (IML) execs made their job “finance engineering” instead of aeronautics, compromising safety.
                              Without human experts & market, who’s using your products?

                              dahukanna@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • dahukanna@mastodon.socialD dahukanna@mastodon.social

                                @thalia there’s thesis written about the 2 case studies.
                                I’ve < 500 chars to illustrate avarice-based human decisions or “shareholder value”.
                                Kodak (incumbent market leader, IML) execs decided not to move into digital media. When ppl stopped using film commercially & personally, their business purpose “disappeared” & so did the company.
                                Boeing (IML) execs made their job “finance engineering” instead of aeronautics, compromising safety.
                                Without human experts & market, who’s using your products?

                                dahukanna@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                dahukanna@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                dahukanna@mastodon.social
                                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                #18

                                @thalia
                                Related courage or stupidity?-
                                Latest Boeing “business as usual” consequence of trimming “safety costs” July 2026- passenger gets abrasion burns from safety belt instead of falling out the plane, mid-air in Boeing 737 NG -
                                “Man Sucked Out of Airplane, Dangles by Seatbelt
                                https://futurism.com/advanced-transport/man-sucked-out-of-airplane-dangles-by-seatbelt”

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • dahukanna@mastodon.socialD dahukanna@mastodon.social

                                  So the AI business “model” is:
                                  1. NOT HIRING 📉 juniors to create human candidates for the specialists & experts with work experience.
                                  2. BURNING OUT ☢️ mid-level engineers, hardware (prices rising), infrastructure consumed unsustainably (water & electricity) to make everyone “addicted” to AI-LLM word & sentence calculator.
                                  3. PUSHING OUT 📉 experienced senior-level engineers who advise & set tech strategy for “the business”.

                                  This is the “Kodak” & “Boeing” business downfall case studies combined.

                                  bytebro@mastodonapp.ukB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  bytebro@mastodonapp.ukB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  bytebro@mastodonapp.uk
                                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                  #19

                                  @dahukanna

                                  Isn't there Stage 4, where they hire back a bunch of 'junior devs' to actually WRITE code, to 'get around' the LLM tokens nonsense?!

                                  dahukanna@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • dahukanna@mastodon.socialD dahukanna@mastodon.social

                                    Related - https://flipboard.com/@futurism/future-society-q9o43qrjz/-/a-t_vHFkmNSpyeK7HvheAfUw%3Aa%3A1737388686-%2F0

                                    “AI Is Pushing Older Employees Straight Out of the Workforce, New Report Finds
                                    https://futurism.com/future-society/ai-pushing-workers-retirement-older-labor-automation?utm_source=flipboard&utm_medium=activitypub
                                    Posted into Future Society @future-society-Futurism”

                                    dahukanna@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    dahukanna@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    dahukanna@mastodon.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #20

                                    Related - https://chaos.social/@dpk/116662550530901242

                                    “Everyone talks about not having senior devs in the future because we’re replacing the juniors with LLMs, but nobody’s talking about losing senior devs now because people who are competent and care about the quality of their work are leaving this LLM-infested hellscape of a career path to go into carpentry, hostelry, or subsistence farming”

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • dahukanna@mastodon.socialD dahukanna@mastodon.social

                                      So the AI business “model” is:
                                      1. NOT HIRING 📉 juniors to create human candidates for the specialists & experts with work experience.
                                      2. BURNING OUT ☢️ mid-level engineers, hardware (prices rising), infrastructure consumed unsustainably (water & electricity) to make everyone “addicted” to AI-LLM word & sentence calculator.
                                      3. PUSHING OUT 📉 experienced senior-level engineers who advise & set tech strategy for “the business”.

                                      This is the “Kodak” & “Boeing” business downfall case studies combined.

                                      dahukanna@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      dahukanna@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      dahukanna@mastodon.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #21

                                      🎶 Non, rien de rien. Non, je ne regrette rien🎶 - Édith Piaf
                                      (No, nothing at all. No, I regret nothing)

                                      “55 Percent of Leaders (sic- Managers) Regret AI Layoffs—and a Major Hiring Reversal Has Begun https://www.inc.com/bruce-crumley/55-percent-of-leaders-regret-ai-layoffs-and-a-major-hiring-reversal-has-begun/91380901”
                                      - https://social.lol/@cote/117030052166099570

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • bytebro@mastodonapp.ukB bytebro@mastodonapp.uk

                                        @dahukanna

                                        Isn't there Stage 4, where they hire back a bunch of 'junior devs' to actually WRITE code, to 'get around' the LLM tokens nonsense?!

                                        dahukanna@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        dahukanna@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        dahukanna@mastodon.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #22

                                        @bytebro looks like your stage 4 is happening - https://mastodon.social/@dahukanna/117030443611389404
                                        Don’t accept low-ball offers as they made their “mess”, let them pay for it to be “unmessed”.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • dahukanna@mastodon.socialD dahukanna@mastodon.social

                                          So the AI business “model” is:
                                          1. NOT HIRING 📉 juniors to create human candidates for the specialists & experts with work experience.
                                          2. BURNING OUT ☢️ mid-level engineers, hardware (prices rising), infrastructure consumed unsustainably (water & electricity) to make everyone “addicted” to AI-LLM word & sentence calculator.
                                          3. PUSHING OUT 📉 experienced senior-level engineers who advise & set tech strategy for “the business”.

                                          This is the “Kodak” & “Boeing” business downfall case studies combined.

                                          rachel@tech.lgbtR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          rachel@tech.lgbtR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          rachel@tech.lgbt
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #23

                                          @dahukanna I saw a video last night which said that AI means we can get junior engineers contributing faster. Was an interesting perspective!

                                          (I am just sharing this perspective, not advocating for it, or defending it).

                                          This is the video, most of his perspective made me depressed!

                                          https://youtu.be/h0hdaHPKDdI

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper