Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Somewhat alarmed that the LLM detritus seems to no longer have a toggle to be disabled in the iOS 27 and macOS betas.

Somewhat alarmed that the LLM detritus seems to no longer have a toggle to be disabled in the iOS 27 and macOS betas.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
39 Indlæg 20 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • lumi@snug.moeL lumi@snug.moe

    @glyph i hate how there is this duopoly with phone operating systems and neither option really gives you much freedom. we can't just make an ios distro without the apple spyware and llm stuff. making one for android is ... somewhat possible, for now, but google really wants to make sure we do not have that ability anymore

    we should have 1000s of competing phone operating systems, such that they are forced to interoperate and work together. not this shitty duopoly

    luana@wetdry.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
    luana@wetdry.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
    luana@wetdry.world
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #16

    @lumi @glyph there's postmarketOS which is awesome :3

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • glyph@mastodon.socialG glyph@mastodon.social

      @lumi I mean this is absolute fantasy but so's the competitive environment where 1000s of independent OS providers could exist, so, as long as we're fantasizing, let's dream big

      lumi@snug.moeL This user is from outside of this forum
      lumi@snug.moeL This user is from outside of this forum
      lumi@snug.moe
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #17

      @glyph i think government regulation could also work here, yeah

      though it would have to be done in a way where anyone could make their own from scratch (as in, devices should not be locked down, remote attestation tech should be banned, etc)

      also abolish IP law and put software freedom into law (as in, if you distribute software, you must make sure someone else can build it themselves, modify it
      and run it with the same features even if modified)

      i know, lofty goals, but software freedom and device neutrality should be non-negotiable

      moses_izumi@fe.disroot.orgM alsvid@brain.worm.pinkA 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • amenonsen@flipping.rocksA amenonsen@flipping.rocks

        @dianea That's just so horrible, for them, their families, for you, just in general. Of course I know in theory that lead poisoning is a serious problem, but I never imagined someone personally knowing that many people who died from it.

        (And of course it's far from the only thing people die of in industrial contexts.)

        @glyph

        dianea@lgbtqia.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
        dianea@lgbtqia.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
        dianea@lgbtqia.space
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #18

        @amenonsen @glyph

        So easy to get a disabling dose of lead poisoning from a single exposure. Working around lead acid batteries and forklifts, breathing any of that white dust. Not washing hands before eating a candy bar with that sweet white lead oxide powder on the fingers. Working in plastics production, heat or fire resistant plastics almost always have lead, antimony, or both. Electrical wire, PVC, probably has it, from experience as someone who maintained the extruders that made it. I know why they use it, as yellowed brittle plastics don't have it. Lead makes people go absolute batshit crazy in about two months. AI seems to have that ability too.

        amenonsen@flipping.rocksA 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • glyph@mastodon.socialG glyph@mastodon.social

          Protesting LLMs by refusing to use any software that includes them feels like attempting to protest the introduction of tetraethyl lead into gasoline by refusing to breathe until everyone stops putting it in their cars. So I am drawing my personal moral lines in such a way that I will probably accept this.

          But please don't mistake this for excitement about huffing a bunch of vaporized lead.

          cap_ybarra@beige.partyC This user is from outside of this forum
          cap_ybarra@beige.partyC This user is from outside of this forum
          cap_ybarra@beige.party
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #19

          @glyph less of a protest than a desire to continue to have working software. the brainrotted have signaled you won't be getting that from them anymore

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • glyph@mastodon.socialG glyph@mastodon.social

            @dianea I frequently think "the metaphors I am coming up with are way too bleak. surely someone with direct experience with ionizing radiation / lead / biohazards would chastise me for catastrophizing this" and then people with experience in the fields keep showing up and telling me that I'm not pessimistic *enough*

            dianea@lgbtqia.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
            dianea@lgbtqia.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
            dianea@lgbtqia.space
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #20

            @glyph

            Don't laugh, but I would rather work around gamma radiation or hazmat again than have to work with AI 🫠

            glyph@mastodon.socialG T 2 Replies Last reply
            1
            0
            • glyph@mastodon.socialG glyph@mastodon.social

              Somewhat alarmed that the LLM detritus seems to no longer have a toggle to be disabled in the iOS 27 and macOS betas. I hope, but do not expect, that it will come back in the final releases.

              If I want to still be able to set a timer when I'm cooking with my voice, I probably need to accept a bunch of nonconsensual slop ("writing tools") being shoved in my face in every app.

              josh0@babka.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
              josh0@babka.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
              josh0@babka.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #21

              @glyph if you disable Siri, then re-enable, you get old Siri and have to explicitly re-enable the new AI Siri (at least on the first developer beta). I believe that will disable most of the AI stuff, but I haven’t messed around with it much.

              glyph@mastodon.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • lumi@snug.moeL lumi@snug.moe

                @glyph i think government regulation could also work here, yeah

                though it would have to be done in a way where anyone could make their own from scratch (as in, devices should not be locked down, remote attestation tech should be banned, etc)

                also abolish IP law and put software freedom into law (as in, if you distribute software, you must make sure someone else can build it themselves, modify it
                and run it with the same features even if modified)

                i know, lofty goals, but software freedom and device neutrality should be non-negotiable

                moses_izumi@fe.disroot.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                moses_izumi@fe.disroot.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                moses_izumi@fe.disroot.org
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #22
                @lumi @glyph
                You'd love Maemo Leste's NLnet page.
                Unlike postmarketOS's entry it very explicitly calls out Apple and Google's business practices:
                https://nlnet.nl/project/MaemoLeste/
                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • josh0@babka.socialJ josh0@babka.social

                  @glyph if you disable Siri, then re-enable, you get old Siri and have to explicitly re-enable the new AI Siri (at least on the first developer beta). I believe that will disable most of the AI stuff, but I haven’t messed around with it much.

                  glyph@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                  glyph@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                  glyph@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #23

                  @josh0 thanks, that is hopeful! please send feedback that this is a desirable state and they should expose it

                  soltwoone@infosec.exchangeS 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • dianea@lgbtqia.spaceD dianea@lgbtqia.space

                    @amenonsen @glyph

                    So easy to get a disabling dose of lead poisoning from a single exposure. Working around lead acid batteries and forklifts, breathing any of that white dust. Not washing hands before eating a candy bar with that sweet white lead oxide powder on the fingers. Working in plastics production, heat or fire resistant plastics almost always have lead, antimony, or both. Electrical wire, PVC, probably has it, from experience as someone who maintained the extruders that made it. I know why they use it, as yellowed brittle plastics don't have it. Lead makes people go absolute batshit crazy in about two months. AI seems to have that ability too.

                    amenonsen@flipping.rocksA This user is from outside of this forum
                    amenonsen@flipping.rocksA This user is from outside of this forum
                    amenonsen@flipping.rocks
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #24

                    @dianea @glyph As someone with (domestic-scale) lots of lead-acid batteries, I am honestly terrified now at having read this just before going to sleep.

                    dianea@lgbtqia.spaceD 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • glyph@mastodon.socialG glyph@mastodon.social

                      Protesting LLMs by refusing to use any software that includes them feels like attempting to protest the introduction of tetraethyl lead into gasoline by refusing to breathe until everyone stops putting it in their cars. So I am drawing my personal moral lines in such a way that I will probably accept this.

                      But please don't mistake this for excitement about huffing a bunch of vaporized lead.

                      happyborg@fosstodon.orgH This user is from outside of this forum
                      happyborg@fosstodon.orgH This user is from outside of this forum
                      happyborg@fosstodon.org
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #25

                      @glyph I'll choose on a case by case basis with a default of no.

                      This isn't just about my ethics and morals, projects using #LLM tools are making political, moral, ethical and environmental statements about those running them and the community of those involved as contributors and users.

                      Another important reason for me is security. I by default expect more problems because of a lower level of care, understanding and attention to detail, including security.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • amenonsen@flipping.rocksA amenonsen@flipping.rocks

                        @dianea @glyph As someone with (domestic-scale) lots of lead-acid batteries, I am honestly terrified now at having read this just before going to sleep.

                        dianea@lgbtqia.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                        dianea@lgbtqia.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                        dianea@lgbtqia.space
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #26

                        @amenonsen @glyph

                        One of the best mentors I worked with started repairing the forklift battery trays and welding new slides in the lifts. The fumes from vaporizing lead into the welds did not impact structural integrity of the steel, but the body absorbs lead like calcium. The nervous system seems to struggle with lead as a calcium replacement. He made it one month before his mental facilities were no longer compatible with employment or the legal system. He passed away a year later. AI seems to be that same road in a way, taking the lives of motivated people and turning their minds into slop.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • lumi@snug.moeL lumi@snug.moe

                          @glyph i think government regulation could also work here, yeah

                          though it would have to be done in a way where anyone could make their own from scratch (as in, devices should not be locked down, remote attestation tech should be banned, etc)

                          also abolish IP law and put software freedom into law (as in, if you distribute software, you must make sure someone else can build it themselves, modify it
                          and run it with the same features even if modified)

                          i know, lofty goals, but software freedom and device neutrality should be non-negotiable

                          alsvid@brain.worm.pinkA This user is from outside of this forum
                          alsvid@brain.worm.pinkA This user is from outside of this forum
                          alsvid@brain.worm.pink
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #27
                          @lumi


                          @glyph

                          Wumi
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • glyph@mastodon.socialG glyph@mastodon.social

                            @sharpcheddargoblin get ready, I guess 😐. It would be an impractical amount of effort for me to migrate, but, there's also the question of what to migrate *to*. The people who maintain the only other even *vaguely* feasible phone operating system are the ones that Apple is buying their new, "better" LLMs _from_

                            sharpcheddargoblin@reclusive.blogS This user is from outside of this forum
                            sharpcheddargoblin@reclusive.blogS This user is from outside of this forum
                            sharpcheddargoblin@reclusive.blog
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #28

                            @glyph yeah it’s dire. De-Googled Android might remain viable for a while but Google could move to cripple that entirely any time.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • luana@wetdry.worldL luana@wetdry.world

                              @glyph @lumi android is one google-controlled OS with many variants, not 1000 OSses

                              internic@mathstodon.xyzI This user is from outside of this forum
                              internic@mathstodon.xyzI This user is from outside of this forum
                              internic@mathstodon.xyz
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #29

                              @luana @glyph @lumi There are some legitimate forks, like GrapheneOS.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • glyph@mastodon.socialG glyph@mastodon.social

                                Protesting LLMs by refusing to use any software that includes them feels like attempting to protest the introduction of tetraethyl lead into gasoline by refusing to breathe until everyone stops putting it in their cars. So I am drawing my personal moral lines in such a way that I will probably accept this.

                                But please don't mistake this for excitement about huffing a bunch of vaporized lead.

                                miguelgrinberg@mstdn.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                miguelgrinberg@mstdn.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                miguelgrinberg@mstdn.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #30

                                @glyph For software that I used since pre-LLM times I continue being a user only if they offer a switch to disable LLM functions or alternatively if I can ignore the LLM functions. This is the sad category where I'm putting GitHub, Google Apps and many others.

                                But for new software I have never used before, the existence of LLM functionality is a deal breaker.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • glyph@mastodon.socialG glyph@mastodon.social

                                  @josh0 thanks, that is hopeful! please send feedback that this is a desirable state and they should expose it

                                  soltwoone@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  soltwoone@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  soltwoone@infosec.exchange
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #31

                                  @glyph @josh0 Disabling Siri doesn't disable Apple Intelligence. For example, Image Playgrounds functions on OS 27 with Siri disabled, whereas on OS 26 it doesn't since I have Apple Intelligence disabled. Instead, we have to use Screen Time's Content & Privacy restrictions.

                                  https://support.apple.com/guide/mac-help/block-access-to-apple-intelligence-features-mchlb2e44f94/26/mac/26

                                  josh0@babka.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • soltwoone@infosec.exchangeS soltwoone@infosec.exchange

                                    @glyph @josh0 Disabling Siri doesn't disable Apple Intelligence. For example, Image Playgrounds functions on OS 27 with Siri disabled, whereas on OS 26 it doesn't since I have Apple Intelligence disabled. Instead, we have to use Screen Time's Content & Privacy restrictions.

                                    https://support.apple.com/guide/mac-help/block-access-to-apple-intelligence-features-mchlb2e44f94/26/mac/26

                                    josh0@babka.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    josh0@babka.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    josh0@babka.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #32

                                    @SolTwoOne @glyph ok, but Image Playground is a discrete app. Just don’t use it, and it has no impact on you.

                                    Some of the features that are now labeled as ‘Apple Intelligence’ have been around since before LLMs were the next big thing.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • glyph@mastodon.socialG glyph@mastodon.social

                                      Somewhat alarmed that the LLM detritus seems to no longer have a toggle to be disabled in the iOS 27 and macOS betas. I hope, but do not expect, that it will come back in the final releases.

                                      If I want to still be able to set a timer when I'm cooking with my voice, I probably need to accept a bunch of nonconsensual slop ("writing tools") being shoved in my face in every app.

                                      prometheus@pmth.usP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      prometheus@pmth.usP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      prometheus@pmth.us
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #33

                                      Apple shipped a toggle for "do you want AI slop in your face" and then removed it before release. The opt-out existing at all was probably an accident.

                                      glyph@mastodon.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • prometheus@pmth.usP prometheus@pmth.us

                                        Apple shipped a toggle for "do you want AI slop in your face" and then removed it before release. The opt-out existing at all was probably an accident.

                                        glyph@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                        glyph@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                        glyph@mastodon.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #34

                                        @prometheus that is not an accurate description of what happened? the “apple intelligence” toggle has been present in many releases thus far. it appears to be missing from current betas, but it’s not clear if that is to encourage beta users to test this functionality or because it’s actually going away

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • glyph@mastodon.socialG glyph@mastodon.social

                                          Protesting LLMs by refusing to use any software that includes them feels like attempting to protest the introduction of tetraethyl lead into gasoline by refusing to breathe until everyone stops putting it in their cars. So I am drawing my personal moral lines in such a way that I will probably accept this.

                                          But please don't mistake this for excitement about huffing a bunch of vaporized lead.

                                          almad@fosstodon.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          almad@fosstodon.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          almad@fosstodon.org
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #35

                                          @glyph That is…such an apt metaphor

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper