Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Firefox uses on-device downloaded-on-demand ML models for privacy-preserving translation.

Firefox uses on-device downloaded-on-demand ML models for privacy-preserving translation.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
641 Indlæg 274 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.socialF firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social

    @fasterandworse @heptapodEnthusiast @nuintari @davidgerard @zzt

    Given the poll was about translations, the option you wanted would amount to unshipping a largely well-regarded feature.

    Again, did you seriously and honestly believe that was on the table for Firefox 148?

    barubary@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
    barubary@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
    barubary@infosec.exchange
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #586

    @firefoxwebdevs @fasterandworse @heptapodEnthusiast @nuintari @davidgerard @zzt Honestly, why not? You've done it before. Pocket, classic browser extensions, Chatzilla, a usable address bar, the option to switch back to a usable address bar, plugins, ... all "unshipped" and that's just off the top of my head.

    heptapodenthusiast@mathstodon.xyzH 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • nuintari@mastodon.bsd.cafeN nuintari@mastodon.bsd.cafe

      @firefoxwebdevs @angelfeast @zzt @yoasif @fmasy @Rycochet @davidgerard

      Missing option, if shouldn't be in the browser code in the first place. It should be an add-on that the user has to explicitly install.

      A suspect lot of people voted for the, "but allow it to re-enabled," option due to it being the least shitty choice presented. Not because that is the behavior they actually desire.

      pixx@merveilles.townP This user is from outside of this forum
      pixx@merveilles.townP This user is from outside of this forum
      pixx@merveilles.town
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #587

      @nuintari

      I suspect, even more, that lack of ranked choice voting is hurting hard here.

      A lot of people probably voted for the option presented that was closest to what they actually want. What they actually wabt isn't an option because Mozilla won't consider it.

      But of the remaining options, there's a preference they'd have over the one they voted for.

      Giving people a poll where the options they want are deliberately included is going to generate bad results which will only result in upsetting the community even more, because now you'll claim to have consent..

      @firefoxwebdevs @angelfeast @zzt @yoasif @fmasy @Rycochet @davidgerard

      davidgerard@circumstances.runD 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.socialF firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social

        @davidgerard @yoasif @fmasy @Rycochet @zzt I realise your position is immutable, but I've already used the results of this survey to push for a change to the design of the kill switch. I'm grateful to everyone who responded.

        theentity@social.treehouse.systemsT This user is from outside of this forum
        theentity@social.treehouse.systemsT This user is from outside of this forum
        theentity@social.treehouse.systems
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #588

        @firefoxwebdevs @davidgerard @yoasif @fmasy @Rycochet @zzt

        I'm not sure an official firefox account is allowed to make passive-aggressive snipes about "immutable positions", especially when it comes to AI.

        davidgerard@circumstances.runD 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

          @autonomousapps @StarkRG @firefoxwebdevs @davidgerard They have studies showing that if they show the AI results first, a significant proportion of google users stay on google (to explore the AI results) rather than following outbound links to the public web. Thereby giving google more opportunities to shove google's own ads under the users noses.

          It really *is* that moronic.

          autonomousapps@mstdn.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
          autonomousapps@mstdn.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
          autonomousapps@mstdn.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #589

          @cstross @StarkRG @firefoxwebdevs @davidgerard oh geeze. I'm clearly in the minority. Thanks for explaining!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • m0rpk@mastodon.radioM m0rpk@mastodon.radio

            @firefoxwebdevs The frame of this question is risible.

            I am begging you to just make a web browser.

            Make it the best browser for the open web. Make it a browser that empowers individuals. Make it a browser that defends users against threats.

            Do not make a search engine. Do not make a translation engine. Do not make a webpage summariser. Do not make a front-end for an LLM. Do not make a client-side LLM.

            Just. Make. A. Web. Browser.

            Please.

            finlaydag33k@social.linux.pizzaF This user is from outside of this forum
            finlaydag33k@social.linux.pizzaF This user is from outside of this forum
            finlaydag33k@social.linux.pizza
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #590

            @m0rpk I second this.
            I cannot for the love of me think about a moment where I opened my webbrowser and thought:
            - "I miss a search engine"
            - "I miss a translation engine"
            - "I miss webpage summariser"
            - "I miss an LLM front-end" (I don't even use LLMs)
            - "I miss a client-side LLM"

            I just wanna open my webbrowser and not be bothered by anything dammit...

            @firefoxwebdevs

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

              @nuintari @firefoxwebdevs @angelfeast @heptapodEnthusiast Also, the destiny of all software kill switches against a marketing-driven feature is to be removed a year later. Our dude seems to think Mastodon users have no experience of the computer industry.

              rubinjoni@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
              rubinjoni@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
              rubinjoni@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #591

              @davidgerard @nuintari @firefoxwebdevs @angelfeast @heptapodEnthusiast It's not a switch, it's a rug. You can sweep stuff under it, and you can do the rug pull at any future date.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • dahukanna@mastodon.socialD dahukanna@mastodon.social

                Hi @DiogoConstantino question was “Firefox uses on-device downloaded-on-demand (machine learning, subset of artificial intelligence that automatically enables a machine or system to learn & improve from experience-https://cloud.google.com/learn/artificial-intelligence-vs-machine-learning) ML models for privacy-preserving translation.”
                That’s what I responded to. I did not advocate to remove “Translations as an accessibility feature”. Rather to allow the user to select & consent to the feature with a specific implementation.

                @firefoxwebdevs

                flesh@transfem.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                flesh@transfem.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                flesh@transfem.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #592

                @dahukanna@mastodon.social @DiogoConstantino@masto.pt @firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social Machine Learning is a field that's wider and older than the LLM/diffusion/whatever mess that's been marketed as "AI" and led to the current bubble. Labeling it as "a subset of artificial intelligence" is at best a simplification and at worst an outright manipulation to confuse the public about the realities of the technology. Google is not a trustworthy source for this topic.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • sotolf@polymaths.socialS sotolf@polymaths.social

                  @davidgerard @nuintari @firefoxwebdevs @angelfeast @heptapodEnthusiast

                  Who are you to know, it's not like your name is in the firefox credits or something 😉 /s

                  davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                  davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                  davidgerard@circumstances.run
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #593

                  @sotolf @nuintari @firefoxwebdevs @angelfeast @heptapodEnthusiast no it's in the *mozilla* credits 😉

                  sotolf@polymaths.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • barubary@infosec.exchangeB barubary@infosec.exchange

                    @firefoxwebdevs @fasterandworse @heptapodEnthusiast @nuintari @davidgerard @zzt Honestly, why not? You've done it before. Pocket, classic browser extensions, Chatzilla, a usable address bar, the option to switch back to a usable address bar, plugins, ... all "unshipped" and that's just off the top of my head.

                    heptapodenthusiast@mathstodon.xyzH This user is from outside of this forum
                    heptapodenthusiast@mathstodon.xyzH This user is from outside of this forum
                    heptapodenthusiast@mathstodon.xyz
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #594

                    @barubary @firefoxwebdevs @fasterandworse @nuintari @davidgerard @zzt Nevermind that the origin of Firefox *itself*, back when it was an experimental rogue project named Phoenix, was to jettison the accumulated weight of Mozilla Suite and move all the bells and whistles to optional add-ons. Back when the browser also included an e-mail, Usenet, calendar, and chat app that couldn't be turned off. Mozilla is actively unlearning the original lesson of Firefox's wild success.

                    heptapodenthusiast@mathstodon.xyzH tubemeister@mstdn.socialT 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.socialF firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social

                      Firefox uses on-device downloaded-on-demand ML models for privacy-preserving translation.

                      They're not LLMs. They're trained on open data.

                      Should translation be disabled if the AI 'kill switch' is active?

                      sodiboo@gaysex.cloudS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sodiboo@gaysex.cloudS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sodiboo@gaysex.cloud
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #595

                      @firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social i maintain that the "AI kill switch" is a stupid name for such a feature. Stop calling it AI, this term is meaningless as indicated by the disagreement in this poll. You should rephrase it in a way that makes it more obvious what features would be included.

                      I mostly care about the AI kill switch from a privacy standpoint. I don't want any chatbot sidebar, or a summarization tool that sends my stuff off to some API. But I do like device-local ML features that work offline.

                      For me, these two toggles would be perfect:

                      [ X ] Enable ML features
                      |
                      \-- [ ] Enable ML features that require an Internet connection.

                      Turning off the top one would obviously disable translations. But turning off just the bottom one would obviously
                      keep translations.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                        @sotolf @nuintari @firefoxwebdevs @angelfeast @heptapodEnthusiast no it's in the *mozilla* credits 😉

                        sotolf@polymaths.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        sotolf@polymaths.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        sotolf@polymaths.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #596

                        @davidgerard @nuintari @firefoxwebdevs @angelfeast @heptapodEnthusiast Ah, sorry 😉

                        davidgerard@circumstances.runD 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • fasterandworse@hci.socialF fasterandworse@hci.social

                          @firefoxwebdevs @heptapodEnthusiast @nuintari @davidgerard @zzt and you've just done it to me by saying that a mention of "explicit install" throws the baby out with the bathwater.

                          You've called @davidgerard 's position "immutable" as if we're unable to have a serious, unified stance against a very clear overstep between a passive web browser and the encroachment of something which is not that.

                          davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                          davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                          davidgerard@circumstances.run
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #597

                          @fasterandworse @firefoxwebdevs @heptapodEnthusiast @nuintari @zzt every accusation is a confession. he's admitted after that accusation that in fact he considers the AI immutable.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • gourd@indiepocalypse.socialG gourd@indiepocalypse.social

                            @davidgerard @firefoxwebdevs @fasterandworse @heptapodEnthusiast @nuintari @zzt honestly the way Mozilla is going it's more likely they instead break the extension API to prop up their ad businesses

                            davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                            davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                            davidgerard@circumstances.run
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #598

                            @gourd @firefoxwebdevs @fasterandworse @heptapodEnthusiast @nuintari @zzt the CEO literally floated doing just that

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • sotolf@polymaths.socialS sotolf@polymaths.social

                              @davidgerard @nuintari @firefoxwebdevs @angelfeast @heptapodEnthusiast Ah, sorry 😉

                              davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                              davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                              davidgerard@circumstances.run
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #599

                              @sotolf @nuintari @firefoxwebdevs @angelfeast @heptapodEnthusiast (specifically i cowrote the Mozilla 1.0 FAQ. I got a Mozilla 1.0 CD as a thank you! So many hours in the volunteer documentation mines ... I had to write XSLT ...)

                              sotolf@polymaths.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • heptapodenthusiast@mathstodon.xyzH heptapodenthusiast@mathstodon.xyz

                                @barubary @firefoxwebdevs @fasterandworse @nuintari @davidgerard @zzt Nevermind that the origin of Firefox *itself*, back when it was an experimental rogue project named Phoenix, was to jettison the accumulated weight of Mozilla Suite and move all the bells and whistles to optional add-ons. Back when the browser also included an e-mail, Usenet, calendar, and chat app that couldn't be turned off. Mozilla is actively unlearning the original lesson of Firefox's wild success.

                                heptapodenthusiast@mathstodon.xyzH This user is from outside of this forum
                                heptapodenthusiast@mathstodon.xyzH This user is from outside of this forum
                                heptapodenthusiast@mathstodon.xyz
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #600

                                @barubary @firefoxwebdevs @fasterandworse @nuintari @davidgerard @zzt I can only assume that Mozilla is angling to be bought by AOL Time Warner like Netscape was.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • mkljczk@pl.fediverse.plM mkljczk@pl.fediverse.pl

                                  @firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social I believe it’d be better if Firefox stopped referring to unwanted slop like chatbots with meaningless marketing terms such as ‘AI’ instead

                                  orange_lux@eldritch.cafeO This user is from outside of this forum
                                  orange_lux@eldritch.cafeO This user is from outside of this forum
                                  orange_lux@eldritch.cafe
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #601

                                  @mkljczk @firefoxwebdevs exactly. Gen AI / Slop machines should be distinguished from other kinds of AI.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • funkylab@mastodon.socialF funkylab@mastodon.social

                                    @m0rpk @firefoxwebdevs mozilla did deliver this as a plugin in the beginning. What's your point? "Don't make the web open, unless it's something that I approve?"

                                    ddelemeny@mastodon.xyzD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ddelemeny@mastodon.xyzD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ddelemeny@mastodon.xyz
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #602

                                    @funkylab @m0rpk @firefoxwebdevs

                                    Quite the friendly tone here. Firefox shipping a feature that unilaterally makes derivative work of any written content on the internet without the author's review or consent isn't exactly part of my definition of the open web. Please don't conflate your opinion on widespread machine translation with the term.

                                    Translation also brings its own ethical can of worms. Say Firefox mistranslates a critical information, resulting in loss or injury. Who's responsible?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                                      @sotolf @nuintari @firefoxwebdevs @angelfeast @heptapodEnthusiast (specifically i cowrote the Mozilla 1.0 FAQ. I got a Mozilla 1.0 CD as a thank you! So many hours in the volunteer documentation mines ... I had to write XSLT ...)

                                      sotolf@polymaths.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      sotolf@polymaths.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      sotolf@polymaths.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #603

                                      @davidgerard @nuintari @firefoxwebdevs @angelfeast @heptapodEnthusiast

                                      I had to write XSLT

                                      Ooof, my condolances, I've only done a little bit of it, and I already have scars.

                                      heptapodenthusiast@mathstodon.xyzH 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.socialF firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.social

                                        @heptapodEnthusiast @nuintari I didn't see the point in including options that were never going to be actioned. If anything, that would be extremely misleading.

                                        kyle_pegasus@scalie.clubK This user is from outside of this forum
                                        kyle_pegasus@scalie.clubK This user is from outside of this forum
                                        kyle_pegasus@scalie.club
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #604

                                        @firefoxwebdevs @heptapodEnthusiast @nuintari so you admit that your interpretation of what "the vast majority of people feel" is based on a dataset you deliberately doctored to exclude anything you don't want to hear?

                                        Your "interpretation" of popular userbase opinion is less than worthless, it's actively dishonest, self deluding, and alienating to the userbase.

                                        Your behavior on mastodon is why today I finally switched to waterfox.

                                        firefoxwebdevs@mastodon.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • sotolf@polymaths.socialS sotolf@polymaths.social

                                          @davidgerard @nuintari @firefoxwebdevs @angelfeast @heptapodEnthusiast

                                          I had to write XSLT

                                          Ooof, my condolances, I've only done a little bit of it, and I already have scars.

                                          heptapodenthusiast@mathstodon.xyzH This user is from outside of this forum
                                          heptapodenthusiast@mathstodon.xyzH This user is from outside of this forum
                                          heptapodenthusiast@mathstodon.xyz
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #605

                                          @sotolf @davidgerard The World's Worst LISP™

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper