For Instagram, my art is "Likely made with AI".

[hawyer@ohai.social]

@davidrevoy another way in which AI has ruined everything

[reiddragon@fedi.catto.garden]

@davidrevoy AI detectors are just pure bullshit. I've fed my own hand-written code into a few of those and they all said the code was between 70 and 100% AI (when some of it was written before ChatGPT could spit out a fizzbuzz that actually worked)

[decafbad@troet.cafe]

@davidrevoy It would be more accurate to say that "the AI was probably trained using this artist work"

[timnolli@convo.casa]

@davidrevoy I would counter that with "Likely classified with AI"

[covercash@mastodon.social]

@davidrevoy @Gargron you should add your own disclaimer… “Likely harvested by Meta’s AI without my consent.”

[zoidbergforpresident@kolektiva.social]

@davidrevoy Video doesn't seem to load on my end...

[crimsonfall@mas.to]

@Pezito when the ai be so incest it can’t do its own research

[sylvia_ritter@mastodon.social]

@davidrevoy A similar issue can be found on Pinterest. Many artworks were wrongly tagged with "AI modified" tags. This is so annoying.

[viennawriter@literatur.social]

@sylvia_ritter @davidrevoy „Our AI likely trained with this artist‘s material“, I guess.

[gudenau@hachyderm.io]

@davidrevoy It's always cool to see the timelapses, even though this context is awful. Helps to show how much work and skill goes into these things and the processes artists go through.

[marctapages@framapiaf.org]

@covercash
So true

@davidrevoy @Gargron

[raven@fedi.raventhemaker.com]

@davidrevoy Ugh. I dread the day that people start using AI to make fake "process" videos.

Sorry you need to be on Insta for the reach.

[contrasocial@mastodon.social]

@davidrevoy

Aidan Robbins, a guy on YT who makes really beautiful mini nature/environmental documentaries made a thoughtful video on the subject on one of his secondary channels

Essentially he describes a growing intent to leave in imperfections in his work, and include "behind the scenes" type stuff to sort of make it easier for people to know it's not AI.

Not the exact same kind of art you make, but maybe some principles that might be food for thought:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ftoUfp709UQ&pp=ygUQYWlkYW4gcm9iYmlucyBhaQ%3D%3D

[arnebab@rollenspiel.social]

@davidrevoy Sorry to hear that

You’re just too good to be human?

(though others already gave the more likely explanation: their AI was trained with your art but is not attributed properly; just imagine if they actually noted the training data it matches: „This image by David Revoy looks like it’s generated by training on art by David Revoy“).

[oblomov@sociale.network]

@davidrevoy I think it's because your art looks too similar to that of David Revoy, the author of Pepper & Carrot, while presenting new comics.

(«But doctor, » etc)

[shaknais@mastodon.social]

@davidrevoy

Sorry its hit you. After I got mislabeled as AI, I had an absolute torrent of people attack me all at once. Hope you don't get quite the same hate.

[me@social.jlamothe.net]

@davidrevoy Here's the dirty secret nobody tells you: these "AI detection algorithms" are themselves AI, and subject to the same "hallucination" issues.

[trinalin@mas.to]

@davidrevoy Dragons of Wales has the same issue. And that sucks for both of you who make such amazing art.

[michelpatrice@jasette.facil.services]

@davidrevoy

Wow, mais l'IA fait des timelapses de ouf...

(Oui, je blague.)

[bloodaxe@fosstodon.org]

@davidrevoy What the hell, that's disgraceful of them. I mean it can't be that hard for a machine to detect *actual* AI art, can it?