For Instagram, my art is "Likely made with AI".

[crimsonfall@mas.to]

@Pezito when the ai be so incest it can’t do its own research

[sylvia_ritter@mastodon.social]

@davidrevoy A similar issue can be found on Pinterest. Many artworks were wrongly tagged with "AI modified" tags. This is so annoying.

[viennawriter@literatur.social]

@sylvia_ritter @davidrevoy „Our AI likely trained with this artist‘s material“, I guess.

[gudenau@hachyderm.io]

@davidrevoy It's always cool to see the timelapses, even though this context is awful. Helps to show how much work and skill goes into these things and the processes artists go through.

[marctapages@framapiaf.org]

@covercash
So true

@davidrevoy @Gargron

[raven@fedi.raventhemaker.com]

@davidrevoy Ugh. I dread the day that people start using AI to make fake "process" videos.

Sorry you need to be on Insta for the reach.

[contrasocial@mastodon.social]

@davidrevoy

Aidan Robbins, a guy on YT who makes really beautiful mini nature/environmental documentaries made a thoughtful video on the subject on one of his secondary channels

Essentially he describes a growing intent to leave in imperfections in his work, and include "behind the scenes" type stuff to sort of make it easier for people to know it's not AI.

Not the exact same kind of art you make, but maybe some principles that might be food for thought:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ftoUfp709UQ&pp=ygUQYWlkYW4gcm9iYmlucyBhaQ%3D%3D

[arnebab@rollenspiel.social]

@davidrevoy Sorry to hear that

You’re just too good to be human?

(though others already gave the more likely explanation: their AI was trained with your art but is not attributed properly; just imagine if they actually noted the training data it matches: „This image by David Revoy looks like it’s generated by training on art by David Revoy“).

[oblomov@sociale.network]

@davidrevoy I think it's because your art looks too similar to that of David Revoy, the author of Pepper & Carrot, while presenting new comics.

(«But doctor, » etc)

[shaknais@mastodon.social]

@davidrevoy

Sorry its hit you. After I got mislabeled as AI, I had an absolute torrent of people attack me all at once. Hope you don't get quite the same hate.

[me@social.jlamothe.net]

@davidrevoy Here's the dirty secret nobody tells you: these "AI detection algorithms" are themselves AI, and subject to the same "hallucination" issues.

[trinalin@mas.to]

@davidrevoy Dragons of Wales has the same issue. And that sucks for both of you who make such amazing art.

[michelpatrice@jasette.facil.services]

@davidrevoy

Wow, mais l'IA fait des timelapses de ouf...

(Oui, je blague.)

[bloodaxe@fosstodon.org]

@davidrevoy What the hell, that's disgraceful of them. I mean it can't be that hard for a machine to detect *actual* AI art, can it?

[nickeast_indiewriter@mastodon.art]

@davidrevoy I'm starting to suspect there are bots out there accusing things of being AI that aren't AI with the explict purpose of blurring the lines between AI and not AI...
It's classic propaganda tactics when no one can tell the truth from a lie the propagandist (in this case AI) has won

[lonm@social.vivaldi.net]

@davidrevoy Sad to see that happening. Now you've posted this I bet some AI fanatic is busy working out how to train up a model that can slop out fake timelapses.

[haliphax@hachyderm.io]

@viennawriter @sylvia_ritter @davidrevoy ️️️

[ray_of_sunlight@mastodon.social]

@davidrevoy Neither humans nor machines can distinguish between actual human made art and AI Generated crap.

[nyancient@social.treehouse.systems]

@davidrevoy you're in good company, Jane Austen also got flagged as "definitely AI". ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[doomsdayscw@kolektiva.social]

@davidrevoy Wow! #AISucks!