Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
48 Indlæg 45 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

    Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

    annika@xoxo.zoneA This user is from outside of this forum
    annika@xoxo.zoneA This user is from outside of this forum
    annika@xoxo.zone
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #30

    @tinker This is basically the premise behind Motel of the Mysteries (which left a strong impression on me as a child) https://i.abackstrom.com/share/2026/09/mysteries.pdf

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

      Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

      guillotine_jones@beige.partyG This user is from outside of this forum
      guillotine_jones@beige.partyG This user is from outside of this forum
      guillotine_jones@beige.party
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #31

      @tinker
      ...And Steamboat Willie was some sort of powerful deity.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

        Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

        proinsias@beige.partyP This user is from outside of this forum
        proinsias@beige.partyP This user is from outside of this forum
        proinsias@beige.party
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #32

        @tinker https://onlinecampus.fcps.edu/media2/Social_Studies/WHGII_2010/Era1Topic2/Resources/Motel_of_Mysteries.pdf

        I got my avatar from this, might be of interest

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • licho@kolektiva.socialL licho@kolektiva.social

          @fennix the vast majority of benches is from poly lactic acid. It's 100% made from sauerkraut @tinker

          catsalad@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
          catsalad@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
          catsalad@infosec.exchange
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #33

          @licho @fennix @tinker Sweet!
          *eats the benchy boat*

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • prefec2@norden.socialP prefec2@norden.social

            @fennix @tinker but for that conclusion they will find plenty of evidence including a sediment layer with micro plastics showing excessive use.

            outofspace@berlin.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
            outofspace@berlin.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
            outofspace@berlin.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #34

            @prefec2 @fennix @tinker

            nah, plastic materials will be long gone. all that remains is a geological layer of concrete and chicken bones 🤣

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • sleepfreeparent@kolektiva.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
              sleepfreeparent@kolektiva.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
              sleepfreeparent@kolektiva.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #35

              @crazyeddie @allan @tinker
              https://permies.com/t/235263/Knitting-Glove-Roman-Dodecahedron

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

                Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

                D This user is from outside of this forum
                D This user is from outside of this forum
                darqchild@hachyderm.io
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #36

                @tinker You place it in your bath simply because baths should have a little boat or duck.

                That is literally a ritual object!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

                  Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

                  gudenau@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gudenau@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gudenau@hachyderm.io
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #37

                  @tinker I mean that's not wrong.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

                    Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

                    tipjip@bonn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                    tipjip@bonn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                    tipjip@bonn.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #38

                    @tinker
                    Would they be wrong, though?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

                      Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

                      cjust@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cjust@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cjust@infosec.exchange
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #39

                      @tinker

                      <archaeologist voice>
                      these were built every year and tossed into the shores of Lake Superior in a solumn ceremony in order to appease to their deity named Edmund Fitzgerald.
                      </archaeologist voice>

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

                        Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

                        stellar@mk.absturztau.beS This user is from outside of this forum
                        stellar@mk.absturztau.beS This user is from outside of this forum
                        stellar@mk.absturztau.be
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #40

                        @tinker@infosec.exchange ritual yes

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS simonzerafa@infosec.exchange

                          @tinker

                          I think you might have just solved the Roman Dodecahedron mystery 😂

                          It's a Roman 3D Printer Test!

                          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_dodecahedron

                          cinebox@masto.hackers.townC This user is from outside of this forum
                          cinebox@masto.hackers.townC This user is from outside of this forum
                          cinebox@masto.hackers.town
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #41

                          @simonzerafa @tinker one theory is that it was a showpiece for metal workers to show off their abilities so you might not be far off.

                          simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • cinebox@masto.hackers.townC cinebox@masto.hackers.town

                            @simonzerafa @tinker one theory is that it was a showpiece for metal workers to show off their abilities so you might not be far off.

                            simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                            simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                            simonzerafa@infosec.exchange
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #42

                            @cinebox @tinker

                            An apprentice piece, possibly for metal casting.
                            Could be! 🙂

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

                              Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

                              meraord@mastodonsweden.seM This user is from outside of this forum
                              meraord@mastodonsweden.seM This user is from outside of this forum
                              meraord@mastodonsweden.se
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #43

                              @tinker "...but we don't know why. Okay?"

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

                                Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

                                balu@muenster.imB This user is from outside of this forum
                                balu@muenster.imB This user is from outside of this forum
                                balu@muenster.im
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #44

                                @tinker "likely"?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

                                  Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

                                  canuckduff@mas.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  canuckduff@mas.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  canuckduff@mas.to
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #45

                                  @tinker Clearly, high-status people were buried with such objects to ensure access to their analogue in the afterlife.

                                  Edited to add: In the time before cheap data, one of my waiting for bus activities was guessing what would survive of my belongings & surroundings if we were, say, buried in ash suddenly. What would future archeologists guess?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

                                    Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

                                    stgiga@blahaj.zoneS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    stgiga@blahaj.zoneS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    stgiga@blahaj.zone
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #46

                                    @tinker@infosec.exchange

                                    I'd think
                                    https://stgiga.github.io/gigaware/mewbust2.stl would in its several copies make my house in 1000 years look holy.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

                                      Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

                                      urban_hermit@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                                      urban_hermit@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                                      urban_hermit@mstdn.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #47

                                      @tinker
                                      Archeologists in the now:

                                      (Old archeologists) The people of this archipelago were primitive because we found no interesting rocks.

                                      (Young archeologists) Based on this boat we found sunk in deep fresh water they had a complex and refined woodworking culture 100k years earlier than your stone working civilization.

                                      (Old archeologists) All these people walked here on a land bridge you know...

                                      (Young archeologists) - rolls eyes in a 'racists will soon be dead' way.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS simonzerafa@infosec.exchange

                                        @tinker

                                        I think you might have just solved the Roman Dodecahedron mystery 😂

                                        It's a Roman 3D Printer Test!

                                        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_dodecahedron

                                        moira@mastodon.murkworks.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        moira@mastodon.murkworks.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        moira@mastodon.murkworks.net
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #48

                                        @simonzerafa @tinker dry spaghetti serving count measurement. gotta be.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                                        Svar
                                        • Svar som emne
                                        Login for at svare
                                        • Ældste til nyeste
                                        • Nyeste til ældste
                                        • Most Votes


                                        • Log ind

                                        • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                        • Login or register to search.
                                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                        Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        0
                                        • Hjem
                                        • Seneste
                                        • Etiketter
                                        • Populære
                                        • Verden
                                        • Bruger
                                        • Grupper