Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Elon Musk now claims it is Trump who has restricted Ukraine's use of Musk's satellite internet.

Elon Musk now claims it is Trump who has restricted Ukraine's use of Musk's satellite internet.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
14 Indlæg 10 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • randahl@mastodon.socialR randahl@mastodon.social

    Elon Musk now claims it is Trump who has restricted Ukraine's use of Musk's satellite internet.

    If that is true, a NATO partner is now preventing Ukraine from leveraging a key technology against the Russian invasion.

    Please ask Secretary General Mark Rutte, if a NATO partner can side with the enemy and still remain a NATO partner.

    mlevison@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
    mlevison@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
    mlevison@hachyderm.io
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #3

    @randahl it seems likely that was the Whitehouse.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • randahl@mastodon.socialR randahl@mastodon.social

      Elon Musk now claims it is Trump who has restricted Ukraine's use of Musk's satellite internet.

      If that is true, a NATO partner is now preventing Ukraine from leveraging a key technology against the Russian invasion.

      Please ask Secretary General Mark Rutte, if a NATO partner can side with the enemy and still remain a NATO partner.

      samsenbdri@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      samsenbdri@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      samsenbdri@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #4

      @randahl
      You want the truth?!

      A European federation would instantly be a global superplayer on absolute eye level with the US, China & Russia.

      Right now, Europe is an economic giant, but militarily and geopolitically a fragmented dwarf hanging on US security guarantees.

      That's exactly what Elon Musk's Starlink throttling in Ukraine exposed: Europe watches helplessly as a single American tech billionaire and the US government single-handedly decide on the continent's defense.

      jabgoe2089@hub.netzgemeinde.euJ jwcph@helvede.netJ 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • samsenbdri@mastodon.socialS samsenbdri@mastodon.social

        @randahl
        You want the truth?!

        A European federation would instantly be a global superplayer on absolute eye level with the US, China & Russia.

        Right now, Europe is an economic giant, but militarily and geopolitically a fragmented dwarf hanging on US security guarantees.

        That's exactly what Elon Musk's Starlink throttling in Ukraine exposed: Europe watches helplessly as a single American tech billionaire and the US government single-handedly decide on the continent's defense.

        jabgoe2089@hub.netzgemeinde.euJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jabgoe2089@hub.netzgemeinde.euJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jabgoe2089@hub.netzgemeinde.eu
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #5
        @Samson - tief In Berlin
        A European federation would instantly be a global superplayer

        but that would mean you would give up your national affiliation and e.g. be governed by a bulgarian president, with a maltese minister of the interior and a french minister of finances. defence would be organized by an irish politician. are you willing to accept this?
        samsenbdri@mastodon.socialS aeoncypher@lgbtqia.spaceA 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • jabgoe2089@hub.netzgemeinde.euJ jabgoe2089@hub.netzgemeinde.eu
          @Samson - tief In Berlin
          A European federation would instantly be a global superplayer

          but that would mean you would give up your national affiliation and e.g. be governed by a bulgarian president, with a maltese minister of the interior and a french minister of finances. defence would be organized by an irish politician. are you willing to accept this?
          samsenbdri@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
          samsenbdri@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
          samsenbdri@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #6

          @jabgoe2089
          This assumption is not necessarily correct. Instead, it reflects a highly simplified and partly misguided conception of a European federation.

          In a federal system, you are not subject to the jurisdiction of individual member states. You answer to a common, democratically legitimized federal executive.

          A European federation will have a supranational government. Therefore, the claim that you would be governed by other nation-states is politically and legally flawed.

          jabgoe2089@hub.netzgemeinde.euJ 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • samsenbdri@mastodon.socialS samsenbdri@mastodon.social

            @jabgoe2089
            This assumption is not necessarily correct. Instead, it reflects a highly simplified and partly misguided conception of a European federation.

            In a federal system, you are not subject to the jurisdiction of individual member states. You answer to a common, democratically legitimized federal executive.

            A European federation will have a supranational government. Therefore, the claim that you would be governed by other nation-states is politically and legally flawed.

            jabgoe2089@hub.netzgemeinde.euJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jabgoe2089@hub.netzgemeinde.euJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jabgoe2089@hub.netzgemeinde.eu
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #7
            @Samson - tief In Berlin
            democratically legitimized federal executive
              get you. but you don't understand.

            these executives might be:

            bulgarian president, with a maltese minister of the interior and a french minister of finances. defence would be organized by an irish politician.

            are you willing to accept these?
            samsenbdri@mastodon.socialS madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.netM 3 Replies Last reply
            0
            • jabgoe2089@hub.netzgemeinde.euJ jabgoe2089@hub.netzgemeinde.eu
              @Samson - tief In Berlin
              democratically legitimized federal executive
                get you. but you don't understand.

              these executives might be:

              bulgarian president, with a maltese minister of the interior and a french minister of finances. defence would be organized by an irish politician.

              are you willing to accept these?
              samsenbdri@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
              samsenbdri@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
              samsenbdri@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #8

              @jabgoe2089
              You don't understand that the whole thing is a process. Under this premise, conditionally in advance first of all yes.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • randahl@mastodon.socialR randahl@mastodon.social

                Elon Musk now claims it is Trump who has restricted Ukraine's use of Musk's satellite internet.

                If that is true, a NATO partner is now preventing Ukraine from leveraging a key technology against the Russian invasion.

                Please ask Secretary General Mark Rutte, if a NATO partner can side with the enemy and still remain a NATO partner.

                chebra@social.vivaldi.netC This user is from outside of this forum
                chebra@social.vivaldi.netC This user is from outside of this forum
                chebra@social.vivaldi.net
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #9

                @randahl not to mention there is a US president's signature on a little paper titled Budapest Memorandum

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jabgoe2089@hub.netzgemeinde.euJ jabgoe2089@hub.netzgemeinde.eu
                  @Samson - tief In Berlin
                  democratically legitimized federal executive
                    get you. but you don't understand.

                  these executives might be:

                  bulgarian president, with a maltese minister of the interior and a french minister of finances. defence would be organized by an irish politician.

                  are you willing to accept these?
                  samsenbdri@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  samsenbdri@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  samsenbdri@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #10

                  @jabgoe2089
                  Jean Monnet Mémoires (1976)

                  „Europa wird in Krisen geschmiedet, und es wird die Summe der Lösungen sein, die für diese Krisen gefunden werden.“

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • randahl@mastodon.socialR randahl@mastodon.social

                    Elon Musk now claims it is Trump who has restricted Ukraine's use of Musk's satellite internet.

                    If that is true, a NATO partner is now preventing Ukraine from leveraging a key technology against the Russian invasion.

                    Please ask Secretary General Mark Rutte, if a NATO partner can side with the enemy and still remain a NATO partner.

                    schmaker@schmaker.euS This user is from outside of this forum
                    schmaker@schmaker.euS This user is from outside of this forum
                    schmaker@schmaker.eu
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #11
                    @randahl Ask your government why they buy stuff from internal enemy instead. #EU is so quiet that it hurts my ears....
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • jabgoe2089@hub.netzgemeinde.euJ jabgoe2089@hub.netzgemeinde.eu
                      @Samson - tief In Berlin
                      A European federation would instantly be a global superplayer

                      but that would mean you would give up your national affiliation and e.g. be governed by a bulgarian president, with a maltese minister of the interior and a french minister of finances. defence would be organized by an irish politician. are you willing to accept this?
                      aeoncypher@lgbtqia.spaceA This user is from outside of this forum
                      aeoncypher@lgbtqia.spaceA This user is from outside of this forum
                      aeoncypher@lgbtqia.space
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #12

                      @jabgoe2089 Gods I hope so.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • samsenbdri@mastodon.socialS samsenbdri@mastodon.social

                        @randahl
                        You want the truth?!

                        A European federation would instantly be a global superplayer on absolute eye level with the US, China & Russia.

                        Right now, Europe is an economic giant, but militarily and geopolitically a fragmented dwarf hanging on US security guarantees.

                        That's exactly what Elon Musk's Starlink throttling in Ukraine exposed: Europe watches helplessly as a single American tech billionaire and the US government single-handedly decide on the continent's defense.

                        jwcph@helvede.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jwcph@helvede.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jwcph@helvede.net
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #13

                        @SamsenBdRi @randahl Well....together with Ukraine, Europe has twice the military power of Russia, so - maybe not that simple 👉 https://www.visualcapitalist.com/visualized-europes-biggest-armies-in-2025/

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • jabgoe2089@hub.netzgemeinde.euJ jabgoe2089@hub.netzgemeinde.eu
                          @Samson - tief In Berlin
                          democratically legitimized federal executive
                            get you. but you don't understand.

                          these executives might be:

                          bulgarian president, with a maltese minister of the interior and a french minister of finances. defence would be organized by an irish politician.

                          are you willing to accept these?
                          madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                          madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                          madsenandersc@social.vivaldi.net
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #14

                          @jabgoe2089

                          Having executives from a lot of different EU countries is not that different from what we have today, is it? Yes, we have our own government in each country, but a huge amount of the laws decided by them are basically EU law being accepted as our own.

                          I get that things get different when we are talking things like defence and military, but again - that has been largely decided by NATO for many years. At least the people calling the shots (pun intended) would live in Europe and have their own ass on the line, rather than sitting in Washington and telling people halfway around the world what to do (and especially not to do).

                          And no - it's not simple, I know. However, we need to find an alternative to being run by other nations with no skin in the game. If that means that we need to work together and accept that our neighbours have a final say in some cases, I can live with that - as long as said neighbour has been democratically elected and I had a vote to cast.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Svar
                          • Svar som emne
                          Login for at svare
                          • Ældste til nyeste
                          • Nyeste til ældste
                          • Most Votes


                          • Log ind

                          • Login or register to search.
                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Hjem
                          • Seneste
                          • Etiketter
                          • Populære
                          • Verden
                          • Bruger
                          • Grupper