"It looks like you're using an unsupported browser"

[ozzelot@mstdn.social]

@ptribble
"Please disable your adblocker to view our website"
So... your website is an ad?

[gurkan@has.siktir.in]

@ozzelot @ptribble
that message gets an instant Ctrl-w from me..
https://has.siktir.in/@gurkan/statuses/01J53XHH8WGRZY836BPCH3686K

[fentiger@mastodon.social]

@ptribble I have a similar thought whenever a messaging app tells me:

"Your message is too long"

When what it really should have said is:

"My buffer is too short"

[failedlyndonlarouchite@mas.to]

@ptribble

why should people expect that every website will cater to every browser ?

many of these unsupported browsers have a market share of only a few percent or less, so why should the website care or even why is it their responsibility to deal with everyone who decides to be different ?

you wanna be different, that is your choice, but you can't whine that people don't accomadate you

[unixwitch@social.tchncs.de]

@failedLyndonLaRouchite @ptribble

There are standards. Just build standard conforming web sites and you don't need to bother at all, which type of browser people use.

https://validator.w3.org/

#W3Ccompliant #html #w3c #AnyBrowserWelcome

[failedlyndonlarouchite@mas.to]

@unixwitch @ptribble

In theory, this is true

In practice it isn't

[colman@mastodon.ie]

@failedLyndonLaRouchite @ptribble “my website is broken, I can’t be bothered to fix it, fuck you”

[failedlyndonlarouchite@mas.to]

@Colman @ptribble

NO

"I choose to use an odd browser that no one else uses and I expect everyone to cater to my desires"

[leeloo@c.im]

@failedLyndonLaRouchite @ptribble
Because they are WEB sites. You know, the thing consisting of open standards.

Look, if you want to make a Microsoft Publisher file, go ahead, but don't pretend that it's a web site. Then there's no pesky standards to follow, only the people with the right software can open it, AND you get to use a nice drag'n'drop gui tool to make it.

Also, 90% of the time, the only thing these minority browsers have done "wrong" is having a slighly different useragent string than the Chrome browser they are really just a skin on top of. You know, the useragent string that has been completely unreliable since the introduction of Internet Explorer.

[failedlyndonlarouchite@mas.to]

@leeloo @ptribble in some theoretical fantasy world where website devs have the time to do things right, you would be correct

in the real world where the boss's Boss's boss is demanding glitzy new graphics, not so much

[colman@mastodon.ie]

@failedLyndonLaRouchite @ptribble half the time those sites don’t even support Safari, which hardly counts as a weird browser, so don’t give me that nonsense.

[failedlyndonlarouchite@mas.to]

@Colman @ptribble

I will stipulate that some sites don't support Safari, which appears to be roughly 15% or so browsers

so that is a fail

[leeloo@c.im]

@failedLyndonLaRouchite @ptribble
No, your website devs are just imbeciles.

Or you are still designing for Internet Explorer.

[failedlyndonlarouchite@mas.to]

@leeloo @ptribble

ah , you have, at last, rediscovered Sturgeon's Law !!

congrats !!

[justinas@soc.dudenas.lt]

@ozzelot conceptually every website is an ad, even if merely for your opinion

[jackpearse@nrw.social]

@ptribble

You should not use browsers at all.

BACK TO BINARY

[fubaroque@mastodon.social]

@ptribble ... the browser would probably simply have worked just fine, if there had not been a braindead browser detection script preventing that. 🤯

[ozzelot@mstdn.social]

@justinas the best adblocker is pulling your router

[apzpins@some.apz.fi]

@ptribble "We recommend that you use a mainstream browser"

Me, staring at the screen in disbelief while using FireFox.

[pavlovscat@mastodonapp.uk]

@ptribble or…we really don’t like your ad blockers.