Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Cowboy Space (I hate their name so much) published their consolidated response a week ago but we just noticed it.

Cowboy Space (I hate their name so much) published their consolidated response a week ago but we just noticed it.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
172 Indlæg 109 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

    After modelling this in detail, I can say that that these companies can't even do basic geometry, apparently. They want tens of thousands of satellites to have 24 hour sunlight, so sun-synchronous terminator orbits, baybeeee!

    But as Hugh Lewis pointed out (I know, ew, linkedin sorry) https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/sun-always-shines-tv-hugh-lewis-tlkbe/ IT DOESN'T FUCKING WORK unless you're above 1400km altitude. And then you're not in the *magical* low-latency low-altitude zone that these companies actually want for fast comms.

    dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    dzwiedziu@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #86

    @sundogplanets
    > They want tens of thousands of satellites to have 24 hour sunlight, so sun-synchronous terminator orbits, baybeeee!

    Okay, I smirked x)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • faithisleaping@anarres.familyF faithisleaping@anarres.family

      @sundogplanets This is so colossally stupid. Like, I know AI + Space! is a perfect VC honeypot but has anyone even thought about the fact that GPUs go out of date inside like 2-3 years? Are they really planning to launch 10,000 satellites per year indefinitely?

      Also, has anyone given ANY thought to radiation hardening? GPUs of the sort that people are using for AI are typically manufactured on a 3nm process or so. Most orbital hardware which we actually want to keep running is manufactured on like 50nm because radiation absolutely destroys tiny circuits.

      But I'm sure it'll be fine...

      deedo@mastodon.nlD This user is from outside of this forum
      deedo@mastodon.nlD This user is from outside of this forum
      deedo@mastodon.nl
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #87

      @faithisleaping @sundogplanets typically I would just like them to fast forward to the Find Out phase.

      Problem with these guys' epic fails is that they take all sorts of scarcities out of the market. Not just talking about the raw materials, energy, labor and capital but also our clean air and skies.

      It's a fucking self-fulfilling prophecy gamble with our lives as ante.

      Why don't we declare war on these genocidal maniacs?

      faithisleaping@anarres.familyF 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • deedo@mastodon.nlD deedo@mastodon.nl

        @faithisleaping @sundogplanets typically I would just like them to fast forward to the Find Out phase.

        Problem with these guys' epic fails is that they take all sorts of scarcities out of the market. Not just talking about the raw materials, energy, labor and capital but also our clean air and skies.

        It's a fucking self-fulfilling prophecy gamble with our lives as ante.

        Why don't we declare war on these genocidal maniacs?

        faithisleaping@anarres.familyF This user is from outside of this forum
        faithisleaping@anarres.familyF This user is from outside of this forum
        faithisleaping@anarres.family
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #88

        @deedo @sundogplanets Yup! And it’s even right there in their pitch:

        It’s inevitable that there will be a mad race to fill space with shit so America needs to start filling space with shit to ensure space will be full of mostly American shit! (Paraphrased)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

          And then there's a whole section where they say that the FCC isn't allowed to consider environmental regulations, and they point to Reflect Orbital getting approved where the FCC specifically said they're not allowed to consider anything except radio broadcasts. This section might actually make me cry.

          Next section is just... complaining, I think?

          And then they end with saying that clearly they need to be approved.

          Fuck you, FCC. Kessler Syndrome is on you.

          jkb@gotosocial.jkbockstael.beJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jkb@gotosocial.jkbockstael.beJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jkb@gotosocial.jkbockstael.be
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #89

          @sundogplanets Regarding that last point: isn't there anything that can be done from abroad to stop this madness? Why can the FCC alone decide what is appropriate to put in orbit of the whole world?

          I dread the "the Americans went nuts and that's why we cannot go to space" chapter of future history books.

          gimulnautti@mastodon.greenG wolf_baginski@meow.socialW 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

            Sure, completely untested, brand-fucking-new company that has never built or launched a satellite. You can definitely launch 20,000 of the biggest satellites ever built.

            Oh apparently their first demo mission is scheduled for OCTOBER 2026? Gosh these guys are fucking unreal. The mission is listed as "power beaming demonstration"

            What does that even fucking mean? Guess they're going to fry some birds and maybe some pilots? Hm. Watch for that I guess.

            jeffzugale@mastodon.artJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jeffzugale@mastodon.artJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jeffzugale@mastodon.art
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #90

            @sundogplanets this sounds like when I was 8 years old and I presented my brilliant idea for firefighting: hyper-compressed water capsules that could be air-cannoned into tall burning buildings, delivering thousands of liters of water to douse the blaze.

            I got a smile, a pat on the head, and a physics lesson.

            These are clearly idiots, who’ve gotten handed a lot of money by other idiots. They don’t even know the Rocket Equation. We should laugh at them. 😂

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.orgL lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.org

              @sundogplanets I think I need to do another piece on this for my weekly national radio report. Just proposed it to the network for Monday -- they almost never don't approve these.

              lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
              lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
              lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.org
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #91

              @sundogplanets Yep, it's a go.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                Cowboy Space (I hate their name so much) published their consolidated response a week ago but we just noticed it. EDIT: It was due at 5pm EDT today. So... I guess I have to read this shit. Swearing a lot here will get me through it.

                A reminder: this is the 4th company that wants to launch fucking enormous "AI data center" satellites into sun-synchronous terminator orbits, giving Earth a ring. This particular company wants 20,000 satellites in one ring.

                project1enigma@chaos.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                project1enigma@chaos.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                project1enigma@chaos.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #92

                @sundogplanets Besides orbit geometry and Kessler syndrome etc., how would they deal with waste heat?!

                project1enigma@chaos.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • project1enigma@chaos.socialP project1enigma@chaos.social

                  @sundogplanets Besides orbit geometry and Kessler syndrome etc., how would they deal with waste heat?!

                  project1enigma@chaos.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                  project1enigma@chaos.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                  project1enigma@chaos.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #93

                  @sundogplanets And besides detrimental effects on astronomy and just everything of course...

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                    This company also posted an ex parte filing (which means they had a super special extra FCC meeting), their satellites are too fucking huge to even be physically possible. They just can't fucking do this.

                    My estimate from looking at this ridiculous sketch is 8x60x10m solar panels... that's a reflecting area of 4800 m^2. The International Space Station, the biggest thing in orbit, has a solar panel area of about 3400 m^2.

                    rachelplusplus@tech.lgbtR This user is from outside of this forum
                    rachelplusplus@tech.lgbtR This user is from outside of this forum
                    rachelplusplus@tech.lgbt
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #94

                    @sundogplanets Hang on, does that diagram imply the satellites they want to launch are so big that they'd need custom rockets to launch them?

                    Somehow I suspect they think that's a flex, which it really, really isn't

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mschfr@mastodon.socialM mschfr@mastodon.social

                      @sundogplanets It's still insane that one national agency can approve something like that that has an effect on every country and every other human on this planet.

                      jonsaenzagirre@mastodon.eusJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jonsaenzagirre@mastodon.eusJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jonsaenzagirre@mastodon.eus
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #95

                      @mschfr @sundogplanets this is the actual problem.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                        Cowboy Space (I hate their name so much) published their consolidated response a week ago but we just noticed it. EDIT: It was due at 5pm EDT today. So... I guess I have to read this shit. Swearing a lot here will get me through it.

                        A reminder: this is the 4th company that wants to launch fucking enormous "AI data center" satellites into sun-synchronous terminator orbits, giving Earth a ring. This particular company wants 20,000 satellites in one ring.

                        edgeofeurope@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                        edgeofeurope@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                        edgeofeurope@mastodon.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #96

                        @sundogplanets But don't all satellites eventually drop out of orbit?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • faithisleaping@anarres.familyF faithisleaping@anarres.family

                          @sundogplanets This is so colossally stupid. Like, I know AI + Space! is a perfect VC honeypot but has anyone even thought about the fact that GPUs go out of date inside like 2-3 years? Are they really planning to launch 10,000 satellites per year indefinitely?

                          Also, has anyone given ANY thought to radiation hardening? GPUs of the sort that people are using for AI are typically manufactured on a 3nm process or so. Most orbital hardware which we actually want to keep running is manufactured on like 50nm because radiation absolutely destroys tiny circuits.

                          But I'm sure it'll be fine...

                          tschenkel@mathstodon.xyzT This user is from outside of this forum
                          tschenkel@mathstodon.xyzT This user is from outside of this forum
                          tschenkel@mathstodon.xyz
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #97

                          @faithisleaping @sundogplanets

                          Yep. That's what I told a student of mine, who brought up the idea of these AI satellites.

                          I remember the time when NASA was paying silly money for original old Intel chips because they needed them for space applications that ran longer than anticipated.

                          BTW, you don't even need to go to space for that kind of problem: I once built a "supercomputer" with a load of RAM and you could measure solar activity from the ECC error logs 😂

                          affekt@hachyderm.ioA 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • murodegrizeco@toad.socialM murodegrizeco@toad.social

                            @sundogplanets

                            This stuff makes no business or even physical sense.

                            Thus it's a psychological operation?

                            crazyeddie@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                            crazyeddie@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                            crazyeddie@mastodon.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #98

                            @murodegrizeco @sundogplanets I think they've realized they don't even have to sell anything to make money. You get investors into your nonsense and then you pay your other companies to do the things you know are pointless and won't lead to anything. Bankrupt the one people invested in when reality hits and walk away with your paid fulfillment contracts.

                            So long as the big fish still make out nobody gives a shit. Bribe the man to look the other way and only unimportant people complain.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.orgL lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.org

                              @GhostOnTheHalfShell @sundogplanets I actually got a note today from a compsci guy I've known for many, many years asking if those things could be repurposed to actually burn stuff on the ground. So this is already in people's minds.

                              timoj@mastodon.onlineT This user is from outside of this forum
                              timoj@mastodon.onlineT This user is from outside of this forum
                              timoj@mastodon.online
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #99

                              @lauren @GhostOnTheHalfShell @sundogplanets That’s basically the plot of Real Genius.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • michael_w_busch@mastodon.onlineM michael_w_busch@mastodon.online

                                @sundogplanets

                                Wait. Are they saying that they are magically going to build an entire new rocket in 3 months?

                                This really is quite the scam.

                                reedmideke@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                reedmideke@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                reedmideke@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #100

                                @michael_w_busch @sundogplanets FWIW, their rocket+spacecraft bus+lots of solar panels concept has existed (in powerpoint, naturally) for a lot longer, their original grift was a space based solar power startup called Aetherflux before they pivoted to AI around the end of 2025 https://mastodon.social/@reedmideke/116581799330100949

                                michael_w_busch@mastodon.onlineM 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                  And then there's a whole section where they say that the FCC isn't allowed to consider environmental regulations, and they point to Reflect Orbital getting approved where the FCC specifically said they're not allowed to consider anything except radio broadcasts. This section might actually make me cry.

                                  Next section is just... complaining, I think?

                                  And then they end with saying that clearly they need to be approved.

                                  Fuck you, FCC. Kessler Syndrome is on you.

                                  gimulnautti@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  gimulnautti@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  gimulnautti@mastodon.green
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #101

                                  @sundogplanets Fascist times are always the times of buffoons, but that doesn’t make them any less dangerous.

                                  Wunderwaffen..

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • jkb@gotosocial.jkbockstael.beJ jkb@gotosocial.jkbockstael.be

                                    @sundogplanets Regarding that last point: isn't there anything that can be done from abroad to stop this madness? Why can the FCC alone decide what is appropriate to put in orbit of the whole world?

                                    I dread the "the Americans went nuts and that's why we cannot go to space" chapter of future history books.

                                    gimulnautti@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    gimulnautti@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    gimulnautti@mastodon.green
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #102

                                    @jkb @sundogplanets Fascism ends by only revolution or defeat in war. It’s not logically contestable!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • reedmideke@mastodon.socialR reedmideke@mastodon.social

                                      @michael_w_busch @sundogplanets FWIW, their rocket+spacecraft bus+lots of solar panels concept has existed (in powerpoint, naturally) for a lot longer, their original grift was a space based solar power startup called Aetherflux before they pivoted to AI around the end of 2025 https://mastodon.social/@reedmideke/116581799330100949

                                      michael_w_busch@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      michael_w_busch@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      michael_w_busch@mastodon.online
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #103

                                      @reedmideke @sundogplanets

                                      Recursive vaporware. Great.

                                      simonbp@social.linux.pizzaS 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • franco_vazza@mastodon.socialF franco_vazza@mastodon.social

                                        @sundogplanets Jesus, "retired engineers" sending AI generated code, in addition to AI generated drafts of new cosmology-breaking theories is officially my new nightmare...

                                        P This user is from outside of this forum
                                        P This user is from outside of this forum
                                        phosphenes@mastodon.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #104

                                        @franco_vazza @sundogplanets

                                        I miss the crackpots of yesteryear, who knew that creating insane cosmologies took a serious hands-on work ethic.

                                        Today's crackpots have it so easy with their LLMs and whatnot. End of an era.

                                        franco_vazza@mastodon.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • rwaschbaer@punkstodon.deR rwaschbaer@punkstodon.de

                                          @sundogplanets Just hope that there's not also an astrology section coming 😉

                                          timtfj@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          timtfj@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          timtfj@mastodon.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #105

                                          @rwaschbaer @sundogplanets Just noting that "physics" and "psychics" are virtually typos of each other

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper