Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Cowboy Space (I hate their name so much) published their consolidated response a week ago but we just noticed it.

Cowboy Space (I hate their name so much) published their consolidated response a week ago but we just noticed it.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
172 Indlæg 109 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

    Cowboy Space (I hate their name so much) published their consolidated response a week ago but we just noticed it. EDIT: It was due at 5pm EDT today. So... I guess I have to read this shit. Swearing a lot here will get me through it.

    A reminder: this is the 4th company that wants to launch fucking enormous "AI data center" satellites into sun-synchronous terminator orbits, giving Earth a ring. This particular company wants 20,000 satellites in one ring.

    edgeofeurope@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
    edgeofeurope@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
    edgeofeurope@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #96

    @sundogplanets But don't all satellites eventually drop out of orbit?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • faithisleaping@anarres.familyF faithisleaping@anarres.family

      @sundogplanets This is so colossally stupid. Like, I know AI + Space! is a perfect VC honeypot but has anyone even thought about the fact that GPUs go out of date inside like 2-3 years? Are they really planning to launch 10,000 satellites per year indefinitely?

      Also, has anyone given ANY thought to radiation hardening? GPUs of the sort that people are using for AI are typically manufactured on a 3nm process or so. Most orbital hardware which we actually want to keep running is manufactured on like 50nm because radiation absolutely destroys tiny circuits.

      But I'm sure it'll be fine...

      tschenkel@mathstodon.xyzT This user is from outside of this forum
      tschenkel@mathstodon.xyzT This user is from outside of this forum
      tschenkel@mathstodon.xyz
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #97

      @faithisleaping @sundogplanets

      Yep. That's what I told a student of mine, who brought up the idea of these AI satellites.

      I remember the time when NASA was paying silly money for original old Intel chips because they needed them for space applications that ran longer than anticipated.

      BTW, you don't even need to go to space for that kind of problem: I once built a "supercomputer" with a load of RAM and you could measure solar activity from the ECC error logs 😂

      affekt@hachyderm.ioA 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • murodegrizeco@toad.socialM murodegrizeco@toad.social

        @sundogplanets

        This stuff makes no business or even physical sense.

        Thus it's a psychological operation?

        crazyeddie@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
        crazyeddie@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
        crazyeddie@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #98

        @murodegrizeco @sundogplanets I think they've realized they don't even have to sell anything to make money. You get investors into your nonsense and then you pay your other companies to do the things you know are pointless and won't lead to anything. Bankrupt the one people invested in when reality hits and walk away with your paid fulfillment contracts.

        So long as the big fish still make out nobody gives a shit. Bribe the man to look the other way and only unimportant people complain.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.orgL lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.org

          @GhostOnTheHalfShell @sundogplanets I actually got a note today from a compsci guy I've known for many, many years asking if those things could be repurposed to actually burn stuff on the ground. So this is already in people's minds.

          timoj@mastodon.onlineT This user is from outside of this forum
          timoj@mastodon.onlineT This user is from outside of this forum
          timoj@mastodon.online
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #99

          @lauren @GhostOnTheHalfShell @sundogplanets That’s basically the plot of Real Genius.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • michael_w_busch@mastodon.onlineM michael_w_busch@mastodon.online

            @sundogplanets

            Wait. Are they saying that they are magically going to build an entire new rocket in 3 months?

            This really is quite the scam.

            reedmideke@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
            reedmideke@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
            reedmideke@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #100

            @michael_w_busch @sundogplanets FWIW, their rocket+spacecraft bus+lots of solar panels concept has existed (in powerpoint, naturally) for a lot longer, their original grift was a space based solar power startup called Aetherflux before they pivoted to AI around the end of 2025 https://mastodon.social/@reedmideke/116581799330100949

            michael_w_busch@mastodon.onlineM 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

              And then there's a whole section where they say that the FCC isn't allowed to consider environmental regulations, and they point to Reflect Orbital getting approved where the FCC specifically said they're not allowed to consider anything except radio broadcasts. This section might actually make me cry.

              Next section is just... complaining, I think?

              And then they end with saying that clearly they need to be approved.

              Fuck you, FCC. Kessler Syndrome is on you.

              gimulnautti@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
              gimulnautti@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
              gimulnautti@mastodon.green
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #101

              @sundogplanets Fascist times are always the times of buffoons, but that doesn’t make them any less dangerous.

              Wunderwaffen..

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jkb@gotosocial.jkbockstael.beJ jkb@gotosocial.jkbockstael.be

                @sundogplanets Regarding that last point: isn't there anything that can be done from abroad to stop this madness? Why can the FCC alone decide what is appropriate to put in orbit of the whole world?

                I dread the "the Americans went nuts and that's why we cannot go to space" chapter of future history books.

                gimulnautti@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                gimulnautti@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                gimulnautti@mastodon.green
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #102

                @jkb @sundogplanets Fascism ends by only revolution or defeat in war. It’s not logically contestable!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • reedmideke@mastodon.socialR reedmideke@mastodon.social

                  @michael_w_busch @sundogplanets FWIW, their rocket+spacecraft bus+lots of solar panels concept has existed (in powerpoint, naturally) for a lot longer, their original grift was a space based solar power startup called Aetherflux before they pivoted to AI around the end of 2025 https://mastodon.social/@reedmideke/116581799330100949

                  michael_w_busch@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                  michael_w_busch@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                  michael_w_busch@mastodon.online
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #103

                  @reedmideke @sundogplanets

                  Recursive vaporware. Great.

                  simonbp@social.linux.pizzaS 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • franco_vazza@mastodon.socialF franco_vazza@mastodon.social

                    @sundogplanets Jesus, "retired engineers" sending AI generated code, in addition to AI generated drafts of new cosmology-breaking theories is officially my new nightmare...

                    P This user is from outside of this forum
                    P This user is from outside of this forum
                    phosphenes@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #104

                    @franco_vazza @sundogplanets

                    I miss the crackpots of yesteryear, who knew that creating insane cosmologies took a serious hands-on work ethic.

                    Today's crackpots have it so easy with their LLMs and whatnot. End of an era.

                    franco_vazza@mastodon.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • rwaschbaer@punkstodon.deR rwaschbaer@punkstodon.de

                      @sundogplanets Just hope that there's not also an astrology section coming 😉

                      timtfj@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                      timtfj@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                      timtfj@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #105

                      @rwaschbaer @sundogplanets Just noting that "physics" and "psychics" are virtually typos of each other

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                        WOW it gets even more whimsical and hand-wavy in the orbital debris section. Actual quote: "Certain commenters raise concerns regarding the extent of the orbital debris mitigation information provided in the application but ignore Cowboy Space’s steadfast commitment to operating
                        safely."

                        In other words: "Why won't scientists believe the words that we wrote down without any actual data, information, citations, or sketches?"

                        ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                        ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                        ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #106

                        @sundogplanets

                        Oh, come on they have lots and lots of CGI. At least I know everything associated with Elon Musk is CGI heavy. It is a pattern that’s persistent across vanity, projects of Petro state rulers, and entrepreneurs who want to build hotels on the moon.

                        We all know we can live in James Bond film!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                          HAHAHA wow apparently they shouldn't have to provide any kind of debris mitigation plan because they haven't built the satellites yet.

                          OK but like... why are you filing if you haven't built the fucking satellites yet?? Weren't you complaining earlier about "warehousing" orbits? WHAT ARE YOU FUCKING DOING RIGHT NOW HMMMM??

                          Then they go on to say that the FCC shouldn't have to think about aggregate collision risk. Just consider one satellite at a time please, ignore the other 19,999

                          nini@oldbytes.spaceN This user is from outside of this forum
                          nini@oldbytes.spaceN This user is from outside of this forum
                          nini@oldbytes.space
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #107

                          @sundogplanets These Ponzi schemes are getting more elaborate and destructive.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • michael_w_busch@mastodon.onlineM michael_w_busch@mastodon.online

                            @reedmideke @sundogplanets

                            Recursive vaporware. Great.

                            simonbp@social.linux.pizzaS This user is from outside of this forum
                            simonbp@social.linux.pizzaS This user is from outside of this forum
                            simonbp@social.linux.pizza
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #108

                            @michael_w_busch @reedmideke @sundogplanets God do I want to corner one of these bros and have them explain SSO Eclipse Season to me...

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • P phosphenes@mastodon.social

                              @franco_vazza @sundogplanets

                              I miss the crackpots of yesteryear, who knew that creating insane cosmologies took a serious hands-on work ethic.

                              Today's crackpots have it so easy with their LLMs and whatnot. End of an era.

                              franco_vazza@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                              franco_vazza@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                              franco_vazza@mastodon.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #109

                              @Phosphenes @sundogplanets Totally. "This in attachment is my conversation with chatgpt, I hope you can find it interesting.." etc

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.orgL lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.org

                                @sundogplanets Their demo video is not reassuring: https://youtu.be/xt_Kn4DggPg?t=122

                                ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                                ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                                ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #110

                                @lauren @sundogplanets

                                I can’t help from working that the American accents feel extremely forced. It’s almost like they were told to speak away. Say a British audience imagine they did..

                                Remind you, I really love all the old bond flicks

                                lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.orgL 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                  Sure, completely untested, brand-fucking-new company that has never built or launched a satellite. You can definitely launch 20,000 of the biggest satellites ever built.

                                  Oh apparently their first demo mission is scheduled for OCTOBER 2026? Gosh these guys are fucking unreal. The mission is listed as "power beaming demonstration"

                                  What does that even fucking mean? Guess they're going to fry some birds and maybe some pilots? Hm. Watch for that I guess.

                                  dougfir@m.ai6yr.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  dougfir@m.ai6yr.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  dougfir@m.ai6yr.org
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #111

                                  @sundogplanets
                                  The science fiction i read as a teenager had more credibility than this.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                    Cowboy Space (I hate their name so much) published their consolidated response a week ago but we just noticed it. EDIT: It was due at 5pm EDT today. So... I guess I have to read this shit. Swearing a lot here will get me through it.

                                    A reminder: this is the 4th company that wants to launch fucking enormous "AI data center" satellites into sun-synchronous terminator orbits, giving Earth a ring. This particular company wants 20,000 satellites in one ring.

                                    laukidh@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                                    laukidh@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                                    laukidh@infosec.exchange
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #112

                                    @sundogplanets “cowboy” and science makes me think of early nuclear experiments like the Demon Core, or the meltdown that happened in my community in the 50s cause they kept turning the reactor back on without figuring out why they had to keep hitting SCRAM.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • jakebrake@ohai.socialJ jakebrake@ohai.social

                                      @sundogplanets

                                      Bigger picture: What about other potential effects? What happens when we have an upper atmosphere chock full of metal and exotic chem particles? And sats that outshine everything in the sky by order of mag? What else breaks or is degraded?

                                      The Aurorae?
                                      Earth's albedo?
                                      Sat-ground radio comms?
                                      Ground-ground radio?
                                      Raincloud / storm formation? Lightning intensity?
                                      Etc.

                                      Scientists used to worry that atomics might burn the sky. Maybe these are accelerants.

                                      photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      photo55@mastodon.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #113

                                      @jakebrake
                                      I think during the Manhattan project one scientist worried about igniting fusion in the Nitrogen of the atmosphere, then did the maths and decided that it was not possible, and stopped worrying, along with anyone else who had taken note of what he was spending time calculating.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • faithisleaping@anarres.familyF faithisleaping@anarres.family

                                        @sundogplanets This is so colossally stupid. Like, I know AI + Space! is a perfect VC honeypot but has anyone even thought about the fact that GPUs go out of date inside like 2-3 years? Are they really planning to launch 10,000 satellites per year indefinitely?

                                        Also, has anyone given ANY thought to radiation hardening? GPUs of the sort that people are using for AI are typically manufactured on a 3nm process or so. Most orbital hardware which we actually want to keep running is manufactured on like 50nm because radiation absolutely destroys tiny circuits.

                                        But I'm sure it'll be fine...

                                        ehproque@neopaquita.esE This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ehproque@neopaquita.esE This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ehproque@neopaquita.es
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #114

                                        @faithisleaping @sundogplanets you see, you're thinking small, they'll laugh 1000s the first year, then tens of 1000s by the time the 1000s are obsolete they'll have A BAJILLION satellites so what's a thousand satellites more or a thousand satellites less

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai

                                          @lauren @sundogplanets

                                          I can’t help from working that the American accents feel extremely forced. It’s almost like they were told to speak away. Say a British audience imagine they did..

                                          Remind you, I really love all the old bond flicks

                                          lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.org
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #115

                                          @GhostOnTheHalfShell @sundogplanets Goldfinger remains the quintessential Bond film. And it always will be.

                                          ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper