Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. "An 8K video is 10 times heavier and more polluting than an HD video.

"An 8K video is 10 times heavier and more polluting than an HD video.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
enshittificatiobooks
24 Indlæg 14 Posters 1 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • urlyman@mastodon.socialU urlyman@mastodon.social

    @CiaraNi turning the ‘up slope’ of video into a cliff for us to fall off https://mastodon.social/@urlyman/112767616997017525

    webhat@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
    webhat@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
    webhat@infosec.exchange
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #15

    @CiaraNi @urlyman we soon won't have to worry about HTML, with the reactification of the web browsers will deprecate the HTML part. The parser is full of hacky code anyway, to support old poorly written HTML /s

    I'm being sarcastic, and I've actually heard something similar

    urlyman@mastodon.socialU 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

      "An 8K video is 10 times heavier and more polluting than an HD video. On your smartphone, you literally can't even see the difference. It's pointless waste."

      From '99th Day: A Warning About Technology' by Gerry McGovern

      #Enshittification
      #Books

      timwardcam@c.imT This user is from outside of this forum
      timwardcam@c.imT This user is from outside of this forum
      timwardcam@c.im
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #16

      @CiaraNi Eh? And there was me naively hoping that your client would negotiate with the server the appropriate resolution for your device and wouldn't download anything more than it could use.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • webhat@infosec.exchangeW webhat@infosec.exchange

        @CiaraNi @urlyman we soon won't have to worry about HTML, with the reactification of the web browsers will deprecate the HTML part. The parser is full of hacky code anyway, to support old poorly written HTML /s

        I'm being sarcastic, and I've actually heard something similar

        urlyman@mastodon.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
        urlyman@mastodon.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
        urlyman@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #17

        @webhat
        quietly removing ‘rtext’ from Hypertext Markup Language? 😬

        @CiaraNi

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

          "An 8K video is 10 times heavier and more polluting than an HD video. On your smartphone, you literally can't even see the difference. It's pointless waste."

          From '99th Day: A Warning About Technology' by Gerry McGovern

          #Enshittification
          #Books

          plantagolabs@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
          plantagolabs@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
          plantagolabs@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #18

          @CiaraNi I watch my videos in 720p for that reason. I go to 1080p if the content really needs it. It is so simple of an act, there is no reason not to do it.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

            "An 8K video is 10 times heavier and more polluting than an HD video. On your smartphone, you literally can't even see the difference. It's pointless waste."

            From '99th Day: A Warning About Technology' by Gerry McGovern

            #Enshittification
            #Books

            zabow@mastodon.bida.imZ This user is from outside of this forum
            zabow@mastodon.bida.imZ This user is from outside of this forum
            zabow@mastodon.bida.im
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #19

            @CiaraNi

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

              "An 8K video is 10 times heavier and more polluting than an HD video. On your smartphone, you literally can't even see the difference. It's pointless waste."

              From '99th Day: A Warning About Technology' by Gerry McGovern

              #Enshittification
              #Books

              dancingtreefrog@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
              dancingtreefrog@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
              dancingtreefrog@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #20

              @CiaraNi But I don't WATCH videos on my smartphone. Screen is too damn small!

              My old laptop and my workstation both have 4K displays, so I can see the difference between HD and 4K on them.

              Haven't bothered watching 8K videos since I figured I'd be getting a down-sized rendering of it. I think that's why the push a while back for 8K TVs went nowhere?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • hoare_spitall@mastodon.worldH hoare_spitall@mastodon.world

                @CiaraNi It's very much the same with audio files. I have a 40 yr old system which produces fully satisfactory results, and my response to family members who tell me I 'need' a newer system to get best results, I tell them I have no intention of spending large sums to get results that only my dog can hear.

                dancingtreefrog@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                dancingtreefrog@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                dancingtreefrog@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #21

                @hoare_spitall @CiaraNi I have a set of Panasonic headphones that lists frequency response from 16Hz-24KHz. My old ears frequency response drops off rapidly above 12KHz...so newer does me no good!

                ciarani@mastodon.greenC 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • kbm0@mastodon.socialK kbm0@mastodon.social

                  @CiaraNi TBH it's not just big tech. Everyone involved in technology gets bored with old things and wants to replace them with new ones. I see a lot of unnecessary churn in open source software and wonder what it is really for.

                  ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                  ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                  ciarani@mastodon.green
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #22

                  @kbm0 Good point

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie

                    @CiaraNi
                    Even 4K needs you to be about 1.5m from a 72" screen to see much difference from upscaled HD.

                    HD (1080p) with higher frame rate (say 96 fps) is more use than QHD or 4K, unless it's a screen the size of a wall.

                    Even 1080p is a bit pointless on a smartphone.

                    My phone was Android 8 and the local AnPost Banking killed the Web interface. The App needed Android 10 minimum. They claimed the App was more secure.
                    An Android App isn't more secure. See fines against Google & Malware on phone.

                    ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                    ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                    ciarani@mastodon.green
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #23

                    @raymaccarthy The constant app updates are truly dementing and almost always pointless in practice.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    0
                    • dancingtreefrog@mastodon.socialD dancingtreefrog@mastodon.social

                      @hoare_spitall @CiaraNi I have a set of Panasonic headphones that lists frequency response from 16Hz-24KHz. My old ears frequency response drops off rapidly above 12KHz...so newer does me no good!

                      ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                      ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                      ciarani@mastodon.green
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #24

                      @dancingtreefrog @hoare_spitall Great example of the pointlessness of the overreaching upgrades-for-the-sake-of-upgrading.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                      Svar
                      • Svar som emne
                      Login for at svare
                      • Ældste til nyeste
                      • Nyeste til ældste
                      • Most Votes


                      • Log ind

                      • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      Graciously hosted by data.coop
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Hjem
                      • Seneste
                      • Etiketter
                      • Populære
                      • Verden
                      • Bruger
                      • Grupper