Truly evil lobbying example https://www.politico.eu/article/europe-choose-ai-climate-goals-data-center-chief-warns/

[bdf2121cc3334b35b6ecda66e471@mastodon.social]

@GossiTheDog considering the AI industry is a trillion dollars in debt and solar is profitable, the ethics don't even really need to be considered. Don't do things that don't make sense. Simple.

[sebastianbelmacuse@mastodon.social]

@GossiTheDog
They don't have an real choices any more - with nuclear power an AI they must be content to live as beasts of the field.

[mavnn@bonfire.mavnn.eu]

@GossiTheDog@cyberplace.social You'd hope tactics like this would be self-defeating, but unfortunately that "hope" is bearing rather a lot of weight I'm not sure it can support.

[ahltorp@mastodon.nu]

@retrocomputing @GossiTheDog There are lots of ways to make tools that do things with much much less power, but there are no incentives whatsoever for these companies to use them. Their answer is always to throw more power at the ”problem”.

[musing_sys@social.fringesec.ca]

@GossiTheDog@cyberplace.social dipshits

[petealexharris@mastodon.scot]

@bontchev @GossiTheDog

It'd be pretty hard to fall behind the US in governance and science policy, so we needn't take any positive lessons from them. Europe is full of people, and people need a livable environment more than they need China not to "win" something left unstated.

Catch up on computing power or catch up on computing sovereignty? Not the same thing. The "more gigawatts is better computing" approach is gallons-per-mile thinking.

[dec23k@mastodon.ie]

@bontchev @GossiTheDog
"ICEBERG, DEAD AHEAD!"

"THIS TECHNOLOGY IS INEVITABLE, FULL STEAM AHEAD!"

https://mas.to/@gabrielesvelto/116760705891632432

[rogerb@mastodon.scot]

@GossiTheDog
Especially odd to even think of considering this trade off given that over the next 20 or 30 years climate change will hit Europe harder than the USA, Russia or China.
I'm sure it hasn't occurred to any of the interested parties that increasing the number of damaging weather events would hit the European economy, demoralise its people, and raise support for authoritarian governments to "sort it out, whatever it takes".

[bontchev@infosec.exchange]

@dec23k @GossiTheDog In fact, if the Titanic had hit the iceberg dead ahead, it wouldn't have sunk. But trying to steer around it caused the iceberg to shear the ship's side, flooding several waterproof compartments.

[dec23k@mastodon.ie]

@bontchev @GossiTheDog

[rogerb@mastodon.scot]

@GossiTheDog
The following applies here:

https://pluralistic.net/2026/06/18/their-trillions-our-billions/#eyes-on-the-prize

[dzwiedziu@mastodon.social]

@datarama
I will wait impatiently for his Behind The Bastards episode.

Or even better, Respect The Dead (A Podcast Where They Don't).

@drahardja @GossiTheDog

[mxchara@seattle.pink]

@GossiTheDog "if we don't accelerate global warming then China will build bigger server farms than us," wow, that's a really convincing case. obviously I'm being sardonic here but the wretched thing is, European (and American) politicians respond reliably to Sinophobia

[dzwiedziu@mastodon.social]

@bontchev
I've got a surprise answer for that sinophobic trope: China has already won, being the world's factory. As in real, material things.

The “West” looking for a new grift has found “AI”. A ineffective, anti-intelectual, technology, that cannot generate a cent of ROI, except for the shovel seller, which needs to finance it's clients.

(And even then China, with bans on chips, has developed a less resource-wasting model.)

So are you a TEACREAL cultist?

@GossiTheDog

[dzwiedziu@mastodon.social]

@GossiTheDog
It could be worse, they could power it from the Polish power grid \s

(~75% coal and oil + 20% gas power mix)

@blogdiva

[pip@infosec.exchange]

@GossiTheDog Mass murders telling on themselves: