Keeping money from going to the Harry Potter franchise isn’t just a symbolic gesture.
-
@rasmus91 @realtegan @cambria @jillL
The novelist Joseph Heller was at a party hosted by some…Rockefeller or whatever, let’s just say Rockefeller.GUEST: Mr. Heller, doesn’t bother you that •you• wrote all these great novels but •he’s• the one who got all this money?
HELLER: No, I have something he’ll never have.
GUEST: What’s that??
HELLER: Enough.
@inthehands @rasmus91 @cambria @jillL
Thank you. This is *exactly* what I was talking about.
-
@inthehands @rasmus91 @cambria @jillL
Thank you. This is *exactly* what I was talking about.
@realtegan @rasmus91 @cambria @jillL
It’s one of my all-time favorite stories. And it’s about money, but it’s not •just• about money. -
Keeping money from going to the Harry Potter franchise isn’t just a symbolic gesture. It’s about preventing real harm to real people.
https://www.advocate.com/news/jk-rowling-anti-trans-organization
@inthehands The money eventually becomes so large in a pile that it's power is timeless. It's like a lich's phylactery. If they gathered enough souls in the first place, of course they'll have it forever.
The systems in place are built to remove limits to the Epstein classes wealth.
-
@rasmus91 @cambria @jillL @inthehands
I'd never become a billionaire because I'd never sit on the money that long. I'd be like, "Ooh, here's a charity that needs it!" or "Hey, that guy needs a new car for work," or "I bet I could revitalize this town by hiring a bunch of people, so let's see how that might work."So I'd just never accrue the money in the first place.
@realtegan @rasmus91 @cambria @jillL @inthehands Exactly. It's not that money rots the brains of billionaires. It's that, to become a billionaire in the first place, you had to be extraordinarily evil and shallow in your choices of what to do with money.
-
Keeping money from going to the Harry Potter franchise isn’t just a symbolic gesture. It’s about preventing real harm to real people.
https://www.advocate.com/news/jk-rowling-anti-trans-organization
-
Keeping money from going to the Harry Potter franchise isn’t just a symbolic gesture. It’s about preventing real harm to real people.
https://www.advocate.com/news/jk-rowling-anti-trans-organization
So where is the transval? Southa frica?
-
@inthehands@hachyderm.io
I know this point has been made before but Harry is her.
Aside from that one time he bought Ron a chocolate frog, despite having unlimited wealth and despite practically adopted and living with Ron's family, despite being written as feeling awkward when confronted by the comparative poverty, Harry does absolutely nothing to help Ron or his family. Their lot is to be poor, his is to be wealthy.@Theriac @inthehands Honestly this part has always bothered me so much. it was kind of supposed to be "don't make friends for their money" or sth but as someone who was helped by friends who were better off during hard times and who has helped friends when they were on hard times and I could... I can't imagine NOT doing that in some way seeing a friend in need.
(also I can't imagine being friends with someone for their money, but that's another thing). -
Keeping money from going to the Harry Potter franchise isn’t just a symbolic gesture. It’s about preventing real harm to real people.
https://www.advocate.com/news/jk-rowling-anti-trans-organization
Just to clarify:
I’m less interested in shaming individuals for liking or not liking Harry Potter (or whatever their kink may be) than I am in the practical, concrete work of keeping money out of JK Rowling’s hands.
Less policing each other, more pitchforks pointed at billionaires.
-
Just to clarify:
I’m less interested in shaming individuals for liking or not liking Harry Potter (or whatever their kink may be) than I am in the practical, concrete work of keeping money out of JK Rowling’s hands.
Less policing each other, more pitchforks pointed at billionaires.
@inthehands Good because irrespective of who wrote it, those are pretty good stories and I'm particularly fond of Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them. -
@fnord99 @arazil @inthehands even when I was a literal child I came to the same conclusion tbh. And anyway childrens media should not be shielded from legitimate artistic criticism just because people think children are too brain-dead to tell the difference between good & bad media. It turns out the "masses" of all ages are, which is why criticism can be useful & help consumers make better & more fulfilling choices about media instead of chugging down whatever slop is currently being pedaled.
@itsmeholland @arazil @inthehands this of course, but i mean the content as seen by a child will focus more on the magic and interactions between friends rather than deeper analysis relevant for adults
-
K koefoed@helvede.net shared this topic
