Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Did you know that 3D printed covers for Flock cameras are easily printed and make cameras inoperable when you plop them on using a pole?

Did you know that 3D printed covers for Flock cameras are easily printed and make cameras inoperable when you plop them on using a pole?

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
35 Indlæg 26 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • mathowie@xoxo.zoneM mathowie@xoxo.zone

    Did you know that 3D printed covers for Flock cameras are easily printed and make cameras inoperable when you plop them on using a pole?

    I share this information for no reason at all.

    neusswave@neuss.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
    neusswave@neuss.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
    neusswave@neuss.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #9

    @mathowie Other cams to cover: Certainly for no obvious reason.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mathowie@xoxo.zoneM mathowie@xoxo.zone

      Did you know that 3D printed covers for Flock cameras are easily printed and make cameras inoperable when you plop them on using a pole?

      I share this information for no reason at all.

      r_3_t_3_c_h@defcon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
      r_3_t_3_c_h@defcon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
      r_3_t_3_c_h@defcon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #10

      @mathowie I'd bet pointing a high powered laser into the lens from 3 blocks away would fuck them up for less $, time, and risk. But I am only speculating.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mathowie@xoxo.zoneM mathowie@xoxo.zone

        Did you know that 3D printed covers for Flock cameras are easily printed and make cameras inoperable when you plop them on using a pole?

        I share this information for no reason at all.

        pthane@toot.walesP This user is from outside of this forum
        pthane@toot.walesP This user is from outside of this forum
        pthane@toot.wales
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #11

        @mathowie I am not American so didn't pick up on the Flock camera controversy until recently. I'm missing the background. Why are they so much more of a problem then speed cameras deployed all over Europe? Is it because they are privately owned and operated for profit rather than installed by police/local govt?

        lukefromdc@kolektiva.socialL netraven@hear-me.socialN dalias@hachyderm.ioD 3 Replies Last reply
        0
        • pthane@toot.walesP pthane@toot.wales

          @mathowie I am not American so didn't pick up on the Flock camera controversy until recently. I'm missing the background. Why are they so much more of a problem then speed cameras deployed all over Europe? Is it because they are privately owned and operated for profit rather than installed by police/local govt?

          lukefromdc@kolektiva.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
          lukefromdc@kolektiva.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
          lukefromdc@kolektiva.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #12

          @pthane @mathowie They are connected to an AI network, and their purpose is to build records of everyone's travel. A speed camera (I do oppose these too) by comparison supposedly does not record any passing car that is not speeding, though there are now some speed cameras that double as license plate reader/logger cameras against ALL traffic. Thus all are targets

          pthane@toot.walesP 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • lukefromdc@kolektiva.socialL lukefromdc@kolektiva.social

            @pthane @mathowie They are connected to an AI network, and their purpose is to build records of everyone's travel. A speed camera (I do oppose these too) by comparison supposedly does not record any passing car that is not speeding, though there are now some speed cameras that double as license plate reader/logger cameras against ALL traffic. Thus all are targets

            pthane@toot.walesP This user is from outside of this forum
            pthane@toot.walesP This user is from outside of this forum
            pthane@toot.wales
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #13

            @LukefromDC @mathowie Thanks. So it's the date retention and misuse that's the problem.

            lukefromdc@kolektiva.socialL ahltorp@mastodon.nuA P 3 Replies Last reply
            0
            • pthane@toot.walesP pthane@toot.wales

              @LukefromDC @mathowie Thanks. So it's the date retention and misuse that's the problem.

              lukefromdc@kolektiva.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
              lukefromdc@kolektiva.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
              lukefromdc@kolektiva.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #14

              @pthane @mathowie Well, all use of data obtained by mass surveillance either is misuse or the thin end of a wedge that is guaranteed to lead to misuse.

              A stolen car found by a flock camera today is a political enemy of a Mayor, governor, or President pulled over, maybe beaten by police, and unlawfully arrested tomorrow.

              Flock cameras also force people to spend time identifying and using bypass routes and extra fuel to go around the cameras.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • fullywoolly@mastodon.socialF fullywoolly@mastodon.social

                @mathowie seems like adding some epoxy to make sure it correctly protects the camera would be a good idea

                mackaj@mastodon.me.ukM This user is from outside of this forum
                mackaj@mastodon.me.ukM This user is from outside of this forum
                mackaj@mastodon.me.uk
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #15

                @fullywoolly @mathowie

                I'm guessing the idea is they can be disabled without damaging them, so a person can't be arrested for criminal damage.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • mathowie@xoxo.zoneM mathowie@xoxo.zone

                  Did you know that 3D printed covers for Flock cameras are easily printed and make cameras inoperable when you plop them on using a pole?

                  I share this information for no reason at all.

                  muddle@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                  muddle@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                  muddle@infosec.exchange
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #16

                  @mathowie Why do tech people always reach for a tech solution?

                  #TechWontSaveUs

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mathowie@xoxo.zoneM mathowie@xoxo.zone

                    Did you know that 3D printed covers for Flock cameras are easily printed and make cameras inoperable when you plop them on using a pole?

                    I share this information for no reason at all.

                    netraven@hear-me.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                    netraven@hear-me.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                    netraven@hear-me.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #17

                    @mathowie well, the camera at least.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mathowie@xoxo.zoneM mathowie@xoxo.zone

                      Did you know that 3D printed covers for Flock cameras are easily printed and make cameras inoperable when you plop them on using a pole?

                      I share this information for no reason at all.

                      skjeggtroll@mastodon.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
                      skjeggtroll@mastodon.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
                      skjeggtroll@mastodon.online
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #18

                      @mathowie

                      I wonder if, hypotethically and only for educational purposes, of course, if instead of covering the lens with an opaque cover it would be more effective to cover it with something that distorts the image it sees instead -- like a fog filter, or a pane of glass smeared with vaseline or similar. Something that might not be immediately apparent when looking at the output.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • pthane@toot.walesP pthane@toot.wales

                        @mathowie I am not American so didn't pick up on the Flock camera controversy until recently. I'm missing the background. Why are they so much more of a problem then speed cameras deployed all over Europe? Is it because they are privately owned and operated for profit rather than installed by police/local govt?

                        netraven@hear-me.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                        netraven@hear-me.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                        netraven@hear-me.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #19

                        @pthane @mathowie they contain high tech wireless tracking technology which can identify you by your phone and track individuals in their cars without the camera feature at all. Wifi mac addresses, bluetooth, cellular, anything identifiable wiill be tracked and assigned to a particular person's profile. Then there's the fact of how often these systems are wrong. Especially if your skin isn't white, because the training data was was overwhelmingly white people. Many people have faced police action and false incarceration when a flock camera in another state claims that someone who doesn't even live there has committed a crime and the police act before verifying. All kinds of "problems" which are actually features.

                        netraven@hear-me.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • netraven@hear-me.socialN netraven@hear-me.social

                          @pthane @mathowie they contain high tech wireless tracking technology which can identify you by your phone and track individuals in their cars without the camera feature at all. Wifi mac addresses, bluetooth, cellular, anything identifiable wiill be tracked and assigned to a particular person's profile. Then there's the fact of how often these systems are wrong. Especially if your skin isn't white, because the training data was was overwhelmingly white people. Many people have faced police action and false incarceration when a flock camera in another state claims that someone who doesn't even live there has committed a crime and the police act before verifying. All kinds of "problems" which are actually features.

                          netraven@hear-me.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                          netraven@hear-me.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                          netraven@hear-me.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #20

                          @pthane @mathowie a simple search for "fuck flock" will be more revealing than what I can say.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • pthane@toot.walesP pthane@toot.wales

                            @LukefromDC @mathowie Thanks. So it's the date retention and misuse that's the problem.

                            ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
                            ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
                            ahltorp@mastodon.nu
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #21

                            @pthane @LukefromDC @mathowie This has been going on for ages with people using public transport, but since they are lower on the social ladder, it hasn’t been seen as much of a problem.

                            But this messes with car people, and boy shouldn’t you mess with car people.

                            All mass surveillance and data retention from it is bad, but there’s a strong smell of privilege over this outrage.

                            joepie91@fedi.slightly.techJ P 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • mathowie@xoxo.zoneM mathowie@xoxo.zone

                              Did you know that 3D printed covers for Flock cameras are easily printed and make cameras inoperable when you plop them on using a pole?

                              I share this information for no reason at all.

                              mrzarquon@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mrzarquon@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mrzarquon@mastodon.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #22

                              @mathowie that also looks like a good piece to mix slow curing resin in. How you dispose of it is up to you, but that curved bowl part looks ideal

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • mathowie@xoxo.zoneM mathowie@xoxo.zone

                                Did you know that 3D printed covers for Flock cameras are easily printed and make cameras inoperable when you plop them on using a pole?

                                I share this information for no reason at all.

                                clayfoot@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                clayfoot@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                clayfoot@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #23

                                @mathowie Leave your electronics behind. Flock cameras now track phones, smart watches, ear buds, or any other tech device with a radio

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • mathowie@xoxo.zoneM mathowie@xoxo.zone

                                  Did you know that 3D printed covers for Flock cameras are easily printed and make cameras inoperable when you plop them on using a pole?

                                  I share this information for no reason at all.

                                  mardor@ruhr.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mardor@ruhr.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mardor@ruhr.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #24

                                  @mathowie “Let's say you want to go skinny dipping in your pool but don't want your camera to record you because you can't trust cloud providers to not have a data leak and then have your junk on the internet.”
                                  https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:7374832

                                  pwassonchat@eldritch.cafeP 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mathowie@xoxo.zoneM mathowie@xoxo.zone

                                    Did you know that 3D printed covers for Flock cameras are easily printed and make cameras inoperable when you plop them on using a pole?

                                    I share this information for no reason at all.

                                    joepie91@fedi.slightly.techJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    joepie91@fedi.slightly.techJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    joepie91@fedi.slightly.tech
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #25

                                    @mathowie it's important to help weatherproof them, after all!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • ahltorp@mastodon.nuA ahltorp@mastodon.nu

                                      @pthane @LukefromDC @mathowie This has been going on for ages with people using public transport, but since they are lower on the social ladder, it hasn’t been seen as much of a problem.

                                      But this messes with car people, and boy shouldn’t you mess with car people.

                                      All mass surveillance and data retention from it is bad, but there’s a strong smell of privilege over this outrage.

                                      joepie91@fedi.slightly.techJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      joepie91@fedi.slightly.techJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      joepie91@fedi.slightly.tech
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #26

                                      @ahltorp @pthane @LukefromDC @mathowie you're not wrong, but I suspect in this case you're going to catch more flies with "also" than with "but"... it seems like a good time to ensure that people include transit surveillance in their understanding of the problem

                                      ahltorp@mastodon.nuA 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • mardor@ruhr.socialM mardor@ruhr.social

                                        @mathowie “Let's say you want to go skinny dipping in your pool but don't want your camera to record you because you can't trust cloud providers to not have a data leak and then have your junk on the internet.”
                                        https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:7374832

                                        pwassonchat@eldritch.cafeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        pwassonchat@eldritch.cafeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        pwassonchat@eldritch.cafe
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #27

                                        @mardor @mathowie this. Covering camera lenses on electronics for privacy reasons is a perfectly reasonable thing to do (we shouldn't have to, but oh well), and maybe we should start thinking about covering our other cameras when we don't need them.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • joepie91@fedi.slightly.techJ joepie91@fedi.slightly.tech

                                          @ahltorp @pthane @LukefromDC @mathowie you're not wrong, but I suspect in this case you're going to catch more flies with "also" than with "but"... it seems like a good time to ensure that people include transit surveillance in their understanding of the problem

                                          ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ahltorp@mastodon.nu
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #28

                                          @joepie91 @pthane @LukefromDC @mathowie I’m not saying the outrage is wrong, just that they didn’t show up when only less privileged people were affected. And let’s face it, nothing is going to get car people to care about pedestrians, cyclists or public transport users.

                                          joepie91@fedi.slightly.techJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper