When LLMs do scientific literature reviews they attribute women's work to hallucinated male researchers and insist that men are more heavily cited and/or more influential even when citation counts show the opposite: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02740
-
When LLMs do scientific literature reviews they attribute women's work to hallucinated male researchers and insist that men are more heavily cited and/or more influential even when citation counts show the opposite: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02740
-
When LLMs do scientific literature reviews they attribute women's work to hallucinated male researchers and insist that men are more heavily cited and/or more influential even when citation counts show the opposite: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02740
-
When LLMs do scientific literature reviews they attribute women's work to hallucinated male researchers and insist that men are more heavily cited and/or more influential even when citation counts show the opposite: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02740
@gvwilson Seems inline with llms being an amalgamation of the average redditor.
-
When LLMs do scientific literature reviews they attribute women's work to hallucinated male researchers and insist that men are more heavily cited and/or more influential even when citation counts show the opposite: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02740
@gvwilson Please repost my message so that my children can be fed.
-
When LLMs do scientific literature reviews they attribute women's work to hallucinated male researchers and insist that men are more heavily cited and/or more influential even when citation counts show the opposite: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02740
@gvwilson
But how could this be? I was promised that "AI" was going to remove all human bias! /sSeriously, I have had people tell me that one benefit from "AI" is that it will reduce bias and make society more equal.
-
J jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
