Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Cowboy Space (I hate their name so much) published their consolidated response a week ago but we just noticed it.

Cowboy Space (I hate their name so much) published their consolidated response a week ago but we just noticed it.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
172 Indlæg 109 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • P phosphenes@mastodon.social

    @franco_vazza @sundogplanets

    I miss the crackpots of yesteryear, who knew that creating insane cosmologies took a serious hands-on work ethic.

    Today's crackpots have it so easy with their LLMs and whatnot. End of an era.

    franco_vazza@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
    franco_vazza@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
    franco_vazza@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #109

    @Phosphenes @sundogplanets Totally. "This in attachment is my conversation with chatgpt, I hope you can find it interesting.." etc

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.orgL lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.org

      @sundogplanets Their demo video is not reassuring: https://youtu.be/xt_Kn4DggPg?t=122

      ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
      ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
      ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #110

      @lauren @sundogplanets

      I can’t help from working that the American accents feel extremely forced. It’s almost like they were told to speak away. Say a British audience imagine they did..

      Remind you, I really love all the old bond flicks

      lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.orgL 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

        Sure, completely untested, brand-fucking-new company that has never built or launched a satellite. You can definitely launch 20,000 of the biggest satellites ever built.

        Oh apparently their first demo mission is scheduled for OCTOBER 2026? Gosh these guys are fucking unreal. The mission is listed as "power beaming demonstration"

        What does that even fucking mean? Guess they're going to fry some birds and maybe some pilots? Hm. Watch for that I guess.

        dougfir@m.ai6yr.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
        dougfir@m.ai6yr.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
        dougfir@m.ai6yr.org
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #111

        @sundogplanets
        The science fiction i read as a teenager had more credibility than this.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

          Cowboy Space (I hate their name so much) published their consolidated response a week ago but we just noticed it. EDIT: It was due at 5pm EDT today. So... I guess I have to read this shit. Swearing a lot here will get me through it.

          A reminder: this is the 4th company that wants to launch fucking enormous "AI data center" satellites into sun-synchronous terminator orbits, giving Earth a ring. This particular company wants 20,000 satellites in one ring.

          laukidh@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
          laukidh@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
          laukidh@infosec.exchange
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #112

          @sundogplanets “cowboy” and science makes me think of early nuclear experiments like the Demon Core, or the meltdown that happened in my community in the 50s cause they kept turning the reactor back on without figuring out why they had to keep hitting SCRAM.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jakebrake@ohai.socialJ jakebrake@ohai.social

            @sundogplanets

            Bigger picture: What about other potential effects? What happens when we have an upper atmosphere chock full of metal and exotic chem particles? And sats that outshine everything in the sky by order of mag? What else breaks or is degraded?

            The Aurorae?
            Earth's albedo?
            Sat-ground radio comms?
            Ground-ground radio?
            Raincloud / storm formation? Lightning intensity?
            Etc.

            Scientists used to worry that atomics might burn the sky. Maybe these are accelerants.

            photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
            photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
            photo55@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #113

            @jakebrake
            I think during the Manhattan project one scientist worried about igniting fusion in the Nitrogen of the atmosphere, then did the maths and decided that it was not possible, and stopped worrying, along with anyone else who had taken note of what he was spending time calculating.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • faithisleaping@anarres.familyF faithisleaping@anarres.family

              @sundogplanets This is so colossally stupid. Like, I know AI + Space! is a perfect VC honeypot but has anyone even thought about the fact that GPUs go out of date inside like 2-3 years? Are they really planning to launch 10,000 satellites per year indefinitely?

              Also, has anyone given ANY thought to radiation hardening? GPUs of the sort that people are using for AI are typically manufactured on a 3nm process or so. Most orbital hardware which we actually want to keep running is manufactured on like 50nm because radiation absolutely destroys tiny circuits.

              But I'm sure it'll be fine...

              ehproque@neopaquita.esE This user is from outside of this forum
              ehproque@neopaquita.esE This user is from outside of this forum
              ehproque@neopaquita.es
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #114

              @faithisleaping @sundogplanets you see, you're thinking small, they'll laugh 1000s the first year, then tens of 1000s by the time the 1000s are obsolete they'll have A BAJILLION satellites so what's a thousand satellites more or a thousand satellites less

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai

                @lauren @sundogplanets

                I can’t help from working that the American accents feel extremely forced. It’s almost like they were told to speak away. Say a British audience imagine they did..

                Remind you, I really love all the old bond flicks

                lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
                lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
                lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.org
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #115

                @GhostOnTheHalfShell @sundogplanets Goldfinger remains the quintessential Bond film. And it always will be.

                ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.orgL lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.org

                  @GhostOnTheHalfShell @sundogplanets Goldfinger remains the quintessential Bond film. And it always will be.

                  ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                  ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                  ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #116

                  @lauren @sundogplanets

                  If I recall correctly, at least for Sean Connery Thunderball was his personal favorite film.

                  It has been so long since I’ve watched any of these films. I really should again. I’ve had some fun watching thin man. I really appreciate most the first two movies.

                  lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.orgL 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • fullywoolly@mastodon.socialF fullywoolly@mastodon.social

                    @faithisleaping @sundogplanets I brought the same thing up to some friends. They were like there are other ways to build in redundancy and besides the output isn't critical anyway.

                    I'm like... Cool so we're just going to have transistors randomly turning on causing shoot through. What could go wrong.

                    theothersimo@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                    theothersimo@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                    theothersimo@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #117

                    @fullywoolly @faithisleaping @sundogplanets stochastic parrot is extra stochastic today.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • scottmgs@justme.masto.hostS scottmgs@justme.masto.host

                      @sundogplanets Sorry, that's probably not fair to dogs.

                      puppydoggy@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                      puppydoggy@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                      puppydoggy@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #118

                      @ScottMGS @sundogplanets as a dog, no it's not lmao

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                        After modelling this in detail, I can say that that these companies can't even do basic geometry, apparently. They want tens of thousands of satellites to have 24 hour sunlight, so sun-synchronous terminator orbits, baybeeee!

                        But as Hugh Lewis pointed out (I know, ew, linkedin sorry) https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/sun-always-shines-tv-hugh-lewis-tlkbe/ IT DOESN'T FUCKING WORK unless you're above 1400km altitude. And then you're not in the *magical* low-latency low-altitude zone that these companies actually want for fast comms.

                        rupert@mastodon.nzR This user is from outside of this forum
                        rupert@mastodon.nzR This user is from outside of this forum
                        rupert@mastodon.nz
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #119

                        @sundogplanets
                        I had naively assumed that sun-synchronous orbits were perpendicular to the ecliptic, not the equator. Presumably such orbits don't benefit from the same rotation that keeps them facing the Sun?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai

                          @lauren @sundogplanets

                          If I recall correctly, at least for Sean Connery Thunderball was his personal favorite film.

                          It has been so long since I’ve watched any of these films. I really should again. I’ve had some fun watching thin man. I really appreciate most the first two movies.

                          lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
                          lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
                          lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.org
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #120

                          @GhostOnTheHalfShell @sundogplanets And he did it twice, too.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • faithisleaping@anarres.familyF faithisleaping@anarres.family

                            @sundogplanets This is so colossally stupid. Like, I know AI + Space! is a perfect VC honeypot but has anyone even thought about the fact that GPUs go out of date inside like 2-3 years? Are they really planning to launch 10,000 satellites per year indefinitely?

                            Also, has anyone given ANY thought to radiation hardening? GPUs of the sort that people are using for AI are typically manufactured on a 3nm process or so. Most orbital hardware which we actually want to keep running is manufactured on like 50nm because radiation absolutely destroys tiny circuits.

                            But I'm sure it'll be fine...

                            red_shirt_no2@c.imR This user is from outside of this forum
                            red_shirt_no2@c.imR This user is from outside of this forum
                            red_shirt_no2@c.im
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #121

                            @faithisleaping @sundogplanets
                            … has anyone heard an explanation of how these satellites will shed their waste heat?

                            The more I hear/think about the problems, the more convinced I am that (actually deploying orbital data centers) is not the actual point of these filings.

                            faithisleaping@anarres.familyF 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • red_shirt_no2@c.imR red_shirt_no2@c.im

                              @faithisleaping @sundogplanets
                              … has anyone heard an explanation of how these satellites will shed their waste heat?

                              The more I hear/think about the problems, the more convinced I am that (actually deploying orbital data centers) is not the actual point of these filings.

                              faithisleaping@anarres.familyF This user is from outside of this forum
                              faithisleaping@anarres.familyF This user is from outside of this forum
                              faithisleaping@anarres.family
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #122

                              @Red_Shirt_no2 The pictures in the marketing material show radiators. Are they enough? Probably not. Do they know that? Of course not!

                              @sundogplanets

                              faithisleaping@anarres.familyF shaknais@mastodon.socialS 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • faithisleaping@anarres.familyF faithisleaping@anarres.family

                                @Red_Shirt_no2 The pictures in the marketing material show radiators. Are they enough? Probably not. Do they know that? Of course not!

                                @sundogplanets

                                faithisleaping@anarres.familyF This user is from outside of this forum
                                faithisleaping@anarres.familyF This user is from outside of this forum
                                faithisleaping@anarres.family
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #123

                                @Red_Shirt_no2 I think a lot of these muppets are under the impression that space is cold. I don't think they have any idea just how hard it is to shed waist heat.

                                @sundogplanets

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                  And then there's a whole section where they say that the FCC isn't allowed to consider environmental regulations, and they point to Reflect Orbital getting approved where the FCC specifically said they're not allowed to consider anything except radio broadcasts. This section might actually make me cry.

                                  Next section is just... complaining, I think?

                                  And then they end with saying that clearly they need to be approved.

                                  Fuck you, FCC. Kessler Syndrome is on you.

                                  sophieschmieg@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  sophieschmieg@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  sophieschmieg@infosec.exchange
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #124

                                  @sundogplanets it's really a question if you can hope physics stops them before or after they do unfixable damage to the orbit.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                    Apparently ALL the opposition letters mentioned how 20,000 bright satellites would absolutely destroy astronomy, so that's nice.

                                    Ok, well, this section is 100% gaslighting, which I expected. "No no no, radio astronomers, you are overreacting! We will totally not clobber your bands and we magically don't have harmonics or unintended radio emissions, despite not having actually ever built a satellite before. Also we'll use lasers to fix everything. Radio astronomers, shut up."

                                    riley@toot.catR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    riley@toot.catR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    riley@toot.cat
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #125

                                    @sundogplanets Did anybody mention the risk of evil space aliens seeing the shiny ring around our planet and enacting a programme to darken the overly lit forest?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                      Sure, completely untested, brand-fucking-new company that has never built or launched a satellite. You can definitely launch 20,000 of the biggest satellites ever built.

                                      Oh apparently their first demo mission is scheduled for OCTOBER 2026? Gosh these guys are fucking unreal. The mission is listed as "power beaming demonstration"

                                      What does that even fucking mean? Guess they're going to fry some birds and maybe some pilots? Hm. Watch for that I guess.

                                      deliachristina@sfba.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      deliachristina@sfba.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      deliachristina@sfba.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #126

                                      @sundogplanets

                                      This just really highlights the freaking audacity of greedy DOGE Bros:

                                      Speculative.
                                      Arrogantly wrong about everything.
                                      Lazily entitled to money that isn't theirs.
                                      Apathetic to consequences.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                        WOW it gets even more whimsical and hand-wavy in the orbital debris section. Actual quote: "Certain commenters raise concerns regarding the extent of the orbital debris mitigation information provided in the application but ignore Cowboy Space’s steadfast commitment to operating
                                        safely."

                                        In other words: "Why won't scientists believe the words that we wrote down without any actual data, information, citations, or sketches?"

                                        matejpp@tenforward.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        matejpp@tenforward.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        matejpp@tenforward.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #127

                                        @sundogplanets Oh, a "steadfast commitment to operating safely"? Why didn't you say so earlier? That changes everything.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • zompus@phire.placeZ zompus@phire.place

                                          @sundogplanets I note that in my engineering job, we call people "cowboys" as a pejorative, to describe someone who hasn't done solid calculations and is making decisions based on vibes

                                          tschenkel@mathstodon.xyzT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          tschenkel@mathstodon.xyzT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          tschenkel@mathstodon.xyz
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #128

                                          @zompus @sundogplanets

                                          Yep. That's the meaning I'm used to. But since they seem to turn other meanings around as well (Tolkien, Cyberpunk,...) I assume they see themselves as bold nonconformists when they use the word.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper