Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Cowboy Space (I hate their name so much) published their consolidated response a week ago but we just noticed it.

Cowboy Space (I hate their name so much) published their consolidated response a week ago but we just noticed it.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
172 Indlæg 109 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • franco_vazza@mastodon.socialF franco_vazza@mastodon.social

    @sundogplanets Jesus, "retired engineers" sending AI generated code, in addition to AI generated drafts of new cosmology-breaking theories is officially my new nightmare...

    P This user is from outside of this forum
    P This user is from outside of this forum
    phosphenes@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #104

    @franco_vazza @sundogplanets

    I miss the crackpots of yesteryear, who knew that creating insane cosmologies took a serious hands-on work ethic.

    Today's crackpots have it so easy with their LLMs and whatnot. End of an era.

    franco_vazza@mastodon.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • rwaschbaer@punkstodon.deR rwaschbaer@punkstodon.de

      @sundogplanets Just hope that there's not also an astrology section coming 😉

      timtfj@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      timtfj@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      timtfj@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #105

      @rwaschbaer @sundogplanets Just noting that "physics" and "psychics" are virtually typos of each other

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

        WOW it gets even more whimsical and hand-wavy in the orbital debris section. Actual quote: "Certain commenters raise concerns regarding the extent of the orbital debris mitigation information provided in the application but ignore Cowboy Space’s steadfast commitment to operating
        safely."

        In other words: "Why won't scientists believe the words that we wrote down without any actual data, information, citations, or sketches?"

        ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
        ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
        ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #106

        @sundogplanets

        Oh, come on they have lots and lots of CGI. At least I know everything associated with Elon Musk is CGI heavy. It is a pattern that’s persistent across vanity, projects of Petro state rulers, and entrepreneurs who want to build hotels on the moon.

        We all know we can live in James Bond film!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

          HAHAHA wow apparently they shouldn't have to provide any kind of debris mitigation plan because they haven't built the satellites yet.

          OK but like... why are you filing if you haven't built the fucking satellites yet?? Weren't you complaining earlier about "warehousing" orbits? WHAT ARE YOU FUCKING DOING RIGHT NOW HMMMM??

          Then they go on to say that the FCC shouldn't have to think about aggregate collision risk. Just consider one satellite at a time please, ignore the other 19,999

          nini@oldbytes.spaceN This user is from outside of this forum
          nini@oldbytes.spaceN This user is from outside of this forum
          nini@oldbytes.space
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #107

          @sundogplanets These Ponzi schemes are getting more elaborate and destructive.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • michael_w_busch@mastodon.onlineM michael_w_busch@mastodon.online

            @reedmideke @sundogplanets

            Recursive vaporware. Great.

            simonbp@social.linux.pizzaS This user is from outside of this forum
            simonbp@social.linux.pizzaS This user is from outside of this forum
            simonbp@social.linux.pizza
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #108

            @michael_w_busch @reedmideke @sundogplanets God do I want to corner one of these bros and have them explain SSO Eclipse Season to me...

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P phosphenes@mastodon.social

              @franco_vazza @sundogplanets

              I miss the crackpots of yesteryear, who knew that creating insane cosmologies took a serious hands-on work ethic.

              Today's crackpots have it so easy with their LLMs and whatnot. End of an era.

              franco_vazza@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
              franco_vazza@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
              franco_vazza@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #109

              @Phosphenes @sundogplanets Totally. "This in attachment is my conversation with chatgpt, I hope you can find it interesting.." etc

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.orgL lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.org

                @sundogplanets Their demo video is not reassuring: https://youtu.be/xt_Kn4DggPg?t=122

                ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #110

                @lauren @sundogplanets

                I can’t help from working that the American accents feel extremely forced. It’s almost like they were told to speak away. Say a British audience imagine they did..

                Remind you, I really love all the old bond flicks

                lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.orgL 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                  Sure, completely untested, brand-fucking-new company that has never built or launched a satellite. You can definitely launch 20,000 of the biggest satellites ever built.

                  Oh apparently their first demo mission is scheduled for OCTOBER 2026? Gosh these guys are fucking unreal. The mission is listed as "power beaming demonstration"

                  What does that even fucking mean? Guess they're going to fry some birds and maybe some pilots? Hm. Watch for that I guess.

                  dougfir@m.ai6yr.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dougfir@m.ai6yr.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dougfir@m.ai6yr.org
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #111

                  @sundogplanets
                  The science fiction i read as a teenager had more credibility than this.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                    Cowboy Space (I hate their name so much) published their consolidated response a week ago but we just noticed it. EDIT: It was due at 5pm EDT today. So... I guess I have to read this shit. Swearing a lot here will get me through it.

                    A reminder: this is the 4th company that wants to launch fucking enormous "AI data center" satellites into sun-synchronous terminator orbits, giving Earth a ring. This particular company wants 20,000 satellites in one ring.

                    laukidh@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                    laukidh@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                    laukidh@infosec.exchange
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #112

                    @sundogplanets “cowboy” and science makes me think of early nuclear experiments like the Demon Core, or the meltdown that happened in my community in the 50s cause they kept turning the reactor back on without figuring out why they had to keep hitting SCRAM.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • jakebrake@ohai.socialJ jakebrake@ohai.social

                      @sundogplanets

                      Bigger picture: What about other potential effects? What happens when we have an upper atmosphere chock full of metal and exotic chem particles? And sats that outshine everything in the sky by order of mag? What else breaks or is degraded?

                      The Aurorae?
                      Earth's albedo?
                      Sat-ground radio comms?
                      Ground-ground radio?
                      Raincloud / storm formation? Lightning intensity?
                      Etc.

                      Scientists used to worry that atomics might burn the sky. Maybe these are accelerants.

                      photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                      photo55@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                      photo55@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #113

                      @jakebrake
                      I think during the Manhattan project one scientist worried about igniting fusion in the Nitrogen of the atmosphere, then did the maths and decided that it was not possible, and stopped worrying, along with anyone else who had taken note of what he was spending time calculating.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • faithisleaping@anarres.familyF faithisleaping@anarres.family

                        @sundogplanets This is so colossally stupid. Like, I know AI + Space! is a perfect VC honeypot but has anyone even thought about the fact that GPUs go out of date inside like 2-3 years? Are they really planning to launch 10,000 satellites per year indefinitely?

                        Also, has anyone given ANY thought to radiation hardening? GPUs of the sort that people are using for AI are typically manufactured on a 3nm process or so. Most orbital hardware which we actually want to keep running is manufactured on like 50nm because radiation absolutely destroys tiny circuits.

                        But I'm sure it'll be fine...

                        ehproque@neopaquita.esE This user is from outside of this forum
                        ehproque@neopaquita.esE This user is from outside of this forum
                        ehproque@neopaquita.es
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #114

                        @faithisleaping @sundogplanets you see, you're thinking small, they'll laugh 1000s the first year, then tens of 1000s by the time the 1000s are obsolete they'll have A BAJILLION satellites so what's a thousand satellites more or a thousand satellites less

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai

                          @lauren @sundogplanets

                          I can’t help from working that the American accents feel extremely forced. It’s almost like they were told to speak away. Say a British audience imagine they did..

                          Remind you, I really love all the old bond flicks

                          lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
                          lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
                          lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.org
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #115

                          @GhostOnTheHalfShell @sundogplanets Goldfinger remains the quintessential Bond film. And it always will be.

                          ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.orgL lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.org

                            @GhostOnTheHalfShell @sundogplanets Goldfinger remains the quintessential Bond film. And it always will be.

                            ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                            ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                            ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #116

                            @lauren @sundogplanets

                            If I recall correctly, at least for Sean Connery Thunderball was his personal favorite film.

                            It has been so long since I’ve watched any of these films. I really should again. I’ve had some fun watching thin man. I really appreciate most the first two movies.

                            lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.orgL 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • fullywoolly@mastodon.socialF fullywoolly@mastodon.social

                              @faithisleaping @sundogplanets I brought the same thing up to some friends. They were like there are other ways to build in redundancy and besides the output isn't critical anyway.

                              I'm like... Cool so we're just going to have transistors randomly turning on causing shoot through. What could go wrong.

                              theothersimo@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                              theothersimo@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                              theothersimo@mastodon.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #117

                              @fullywoolly @faithisleaping @sundogplanets stochastic parrot is extra stochastic today.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • scottmgs@justme.masto.hostS scottmgs@justme.masto.host

                                @sundogplanets Sorry, that's probably not fair to dogs.

                                puppydoggy@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                puppydoggy@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                puppydoggy@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #118

                                @ScottMGS @sundogplanets as a dog, no it's not lmao

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                  After modelling this in detail, I can say that that these companies can't even do basic geometry, apparently. They want tens of thousands of satellites to have 24 hour sunlight, so sun-synchronous terminator orbits, baybeeee!

                                  But as Hugh Lewis pointed out (I know, ew, linkedin sorry) https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/sun-always-shines-tv-hugh-lewis-tlkbe/ IT DOESN'T FUCKING WORK unless you're above 1400km altitude. And then you're not in the *magical* low-latency low-altitude zone that these companies actually want for fast comms.

                                  rupert@mastodon.nzR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  rupert@mastodon.nzR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  rupert@mastodon.nz
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #119

                                  @sundogplanets
                                  I had naively assumed that sun-synchronous orbits were perpendicular to the ecliptic, not the equator. Presumably such orbits don't benefit from the same rotation that keeps them facing the Sun?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai

                                    @lauren @sundogplanets

                                    If I recall correctly, at least for Sean Connery Thunderball was his personal favorite film.

                                    It has been so long since I’ve watched any of these films. I really should again. I’ve had some fun watching thin man. I really appreciate most the first two movies.

                                    lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
                                    lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.orgL This user is from outside of this forum
                                    lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.org
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #120

                                    @GhostOnTheHalfShell @sundogplanets And he did it twice, too.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • faithisleaping@anarres.familyF faithisleaping@anarres.family

                                      @sundogplanets This is so colossally stupid. Like, I know AI + Space! is a perfect VC honeypot but has anyone even thought about the fact that GPUs go out of date inside like 2-3 years? Are they really planning to launch 10,000 satellites per year indefinitely?

                                      Also, has anyone given ANY thought to radiation hardening? GPUs of the sort that people are using for AI are typically manufactured on a 3nm process or so. Most orbital hardware which we actually want to keep running is manufactured on like 50nm because radiation absolutely destroys tiny circuits.

                                      But I'm sure it'll be fine...

                                      red_shirt_no2@c.imR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      red_shirt_no2@c.imR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      red_shirt_no2@c.im
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #121

                                      @faithisleaping @sundogplanets
                                      … has anyone heard an explanation of how these satellites will shed their waste heat?

                                      The more I hear/think about the problems, the more convinced I am that (actually deploying orbital data centers) is not the actual point of these filings.

                                      faithisleaping@anarres.familyF 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • red_shirt_no2@c.imR red_shirt_no2@c.im

                                        @faithisleaping @sundogplanets
                                        … has anyone heard an explanation of how these satellites will shed their waste heat?

                                        The more I hear/think about the problems, the more convinced I am that (actually deploying orbital data centers) is not the actual point of these filings.

                                        faithisleaping@anarres.familyF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        faithisleaping@anarres.familyF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        faithisleaping@anarres.family
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #122

                                        @Red_Shirt_no2 The pictures in the marketing material show radiators. Are they enough? Probably not. Do they know that? Of course not!

                                        @sundogplanets

                                        faithisleaping@anarres.familyF shaknais@mastodon.socialS 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • faithisleaping@anarres.familyF faithisleaping@anarres.family

                                          @Red_Shirt_no2 The pictures in the marketing material show radiators. Are they enough? Probably not. Do they know that? Of course not!

                                          @sundogplanets

                                          faithisleaping@anarres.familyF This user is from outside of this forum
                                          faithisleaping@anarres.familyF This user is from outside of this forum
                                          faithisleaping@anarres.family
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #123

                                          @Red_Shirt_no2 I think a lot of these muppets are under the impression that space is cold. I don't think they have any idea just how hard it is to shed waist heat.

                                          @sundogplanets

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper