Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. The world’s solar capacity reached 1,419 gigawatts in 2023, way beyond any predictions.

The world’s solar capacity reached 1,419 gigawatts in 2023, way beyond any predictions.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
40 Indlæg 25 Posters 23 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • infobeautiful@vis.socialI infobeautiful@vis.social

    The world’s solar capacity reached 1,419 gigawatts in 2023, way beyond any predictions. 1 gigawatt = power for a medium sized city

    simplicator@federate.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    simplicator@federate.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    simplicator@federate.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #30

    @infobeautiful More than enough to power a DeLorean back to the future 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • nicolai@babka.socialN nicolai@babka.social

      @infobeautiful the IEA is famous for denying what cannot be denied until the very last minute.

      nicolai@babka.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
      nicolai@babka.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
      nicolai@babka.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #31

      @infobeautiful the IEA is traditionally very nuclear friendly and of course aware that solar and wind are pushing nuclear from „expensive but with enough subsidies and imperialism it might work“ into „are you ducking nuts?!?“ territory

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • tartley@fosstodon.orgT tartley@fosstodon.org

        @martin you might need access to 100% backup while still being able to reduce your need for fossil generated energy by a majority amount - those aren't incompatible.

        martin@libera.siteM This user is from outside of this forum
        martin@libera.siteM This user is from outside of this forum
        martin@libera.site
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #32
        @Jonathan Hartley
        That's true. But it will be expensive. Even with zero price for FV panels.

        Or we could have a stable ☢️ and not have installations with 200% of the required performance, right...
        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD dzwiedziu@mastodon.social

          @ohir
          So you're saying that to solve energy and heat storage we need sites that will have large amounts of a poisonous, bio-accumulative heavy metal working in an highly hazardous acid, and all that working within daily deep-cycling, on an industrial scale, plus constant industrial-scale recycling, and that it will be cheap and safe?

          Yeah, no citations (not counting regulation existing alone) means I'll pass.

          @infobeautiful

          ohir@social.vivaldi.netO This user is from outside of this forum
          ohir@social.vivaldi.netO This user is from outside of this forum
          ohir@social.vivaldi.net
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #33

          @dzwiedziu @infobeautiful [...] Yes! Almost every point of anti-storage propaganda repeated (the one omitted is about hydrogen being flammable).

          Debunking:
          1. All components of lead-acid batteries are curently _byproducts_ of other indispensable industries. Lead itself accompanies copper ores. Sulfur is a byproduct of natural gas/oil. Whether either "waste" byproduct ends up in landfills or in batteries matters.
          2. Battery plates can be renovated on-site using very simple machines. 50yrs ago operated by humans, now can be entirely autonomous. Very small storages (house) can be renovated by mobile semi-van mounted machine.
          3. "Highly hazardous" acid somehow is not that hazardous if used in the car battery. Nor it was when used in warehouse lifters since 1890.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD dzwiedziu@mastodon.social

            @ohir
            So you're saying that to solve energy and heat storage we need sites that will have large amounts of a poisonous, bio-accumulative heavy metal working in an highly hazardous acid, and all that working within daily deep-cycling, on an industrial scale, plus constant industrial-scale recycling, and that it will be cheap and safe?

            Yeah, no citations (not counting regulation existing alone) means I'll pass.

            @infobeautiful

            ohir@social.vivaldi.netO This user is from outside of this forum
            ohir@social.vivaldi.netO This user is from outside of this forum
            ohir@social.vivaldi.net
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #34

            @dzwiedziu @infobeautiful

            As for the heat storage: mid-temperature heat accumulator can store around 1MWh per 1 cubic meter of gravel. Insulated by the very same gravel turned into the mineral wool. My house heat accu (I can not build on my own land) is designed to the tune of 7MWh, co it could store heat from 30kW solar installation operating from March to September. This fits into the 6m diameter rotunde. In 2020 was expected to cost around €15000. 4/5 of that the insulation. In non-lobbied regulatory environment this insulation could be made on-site from the gravel (and some amount of aluminium) by simple machine known for two centuries now.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • bitprophet@social.coopB bitprophet@social.coop

              @infobeautiful why were people predicting a /downslope/ for so long, seems like a bizarre forecast. “Oh, solar rates have been climbing modestly for the last few years but I’m sure it’s just a passing fad…”

              gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.placeG This user is from outside of this forum
              gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.placeG This user is from outside of this forum
              gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.place
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #35

              @bitprophet @infobeautiful there is a whole book by @solar_chase from bloombergNEF on the subject.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • infobeautiful@vis.socialI infobeautiful@vis.social

                The world’s solar capacity reached 1,419 gigawatts in 2023, way beyond any predictions. 1 gigawatt = power for a medium sized city

                davidm_yeg@mstdn.caD This user is from outside of this forum
                davidm_yeg@mstdn.caD This user is from outside of this forum
                davidm_yeg@mstdn.ca
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #36

                @infobeautiful

                It’s almost like there’s an entrenched, wealthy, and powerful special interest group with a vested interest in discouraging investments in solar … 🤷‍♂️

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • infobeautiful@vis.socialI infobeautiful@vis.social

                  The world’s solar capacity reached 1,419 gigawatts in 2023, way beyond any predictions. 1 gigawatt = power for a medium sized city

                  jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #37

                  @infobeautiful@vis.social this chart demonstrates how ridiculously pessimistic the IEA is, to the point of uselessness. i mean just look at it, it wasn't until 2020 where they didn't predict an actual decline in installations. pure clown shit

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • martin@libera.siteM martin@libera.site
                    @Jonathan Hartley Nope. You need 100% backup(from about 50% of Ren share). Fossil backup.
                    That's why it's not cheap. and will not be. Never.

                    #^https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunkelflaute
                    dr2chase@ohai.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dr2chase@ohai.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dr2chase@ohai.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #38

                    @martin you seem very certain, as if we could not, say grossly over provision green + batteries, and shut down some industrial processes for the tiny fraction of time when still+dark is too long.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai

                      @infobeautiful

                      Herbicides, pesticides, fertilizer and soil compaction, as well as erosion from modern farming have obliterated 40% of the world’s carbon and hydrological capacity as well as it’s fertility.

                      Industrial Farms are a biological waste land of toxic chemicals, fossil fuel emissions, herbicides, fungicides and pesticides.

                      All this to make corporations massively wealthier, while destroying the product, actual productive capacity of the land to sustain both the our climate and us

                      bhasic@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      bhasic@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      bhasic@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #39

                      @GhostOnTheHalfShell @infobeautiful https://ourworldindata.org/land-use-diets

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • bhasic@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                        bhasic@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                        bhasic@mastodon.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #40

                        @GhostOnTheHalfShell @infobeautiful https://ourworldindata.org/food-choice-vs-eating-local

                        https://ourworldindata.org/less-meat-or-sustainable-meat

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • simonjust@mstdn.dkS simonjust@mstdn.dk shared this topic
                        Svar
                        • Svar som emne
                        Login for at svare
                        • Ældste til nyeste
                        • Nyeste til ældste
                        • Most Votes


                        • Log ind

                        • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        Graciously hosted by data.coop
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Hjem
                        • Seneste
                        • Etiketter
                        • Populære
                        • Verden
                        • Bruger
                        • Grupper