Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. The world’s solar capacity reached 1,419 gigawatts in 2023, way beyond any predictions.

The world’s solar capacity reached 1,419 gigawatts in 2023, way beyond any predictions.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
40 Indlæg 25 Posters 23 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • infobeautiful@vis.socialI infobeautiful@vis.social

    The world’s solar capacity reached 1,419 gigawatts in 2023, way beyond any predictions. 1 gigawatt = power for a medium sized city

    amici@fribygda.noA This user is from outside of this forum
    amici@fribygda.noA This user is from outside of this forum
    amici@fribygda.no
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #25

    @infobeautiful

    war and conflict is unfortunately a likely major contributor to this, though I'm glad the shift is happening

    just look at what happened to Cuba lately, without fuel the society goes to a standstill, they desperately need more green tech and everyone will know that unless they also make the shift, the unpredictability of fossil fuel politics may hit them hard at some point, adding to all the other existing arguments to shift

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • tartley@fosstodon.orgT tartley@fosstodon.org

      @aanee @infobeautiful while I'm 100% on board with you directionally, I suppose the counter argument would be that exponential growth has to tap out eventually, is just a question of when it turns into an S-curve.

      bigheadmode@social.linux.pizzaB This user is from outside of this forum
      bigheadmode@social.linux.pizzaB This user is from outside of this forum
      bigheadmode@social.linux.pizza
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #26

      @tartley The Total Addressable Market of solar panels is anywhere that can have a reasonable ROI on a solar panel given local electricity demand. As panels get cheaper they become economical in cloudier places.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • dryak@mstdn.scienceD dryak@mstdn.science

        @tartley @aanee @infobeautiful Well, what would be a limitting factors that would make it more expensive/more difficult to keep expanding solar?

        => running out of physical space to build panels on:
        Yes but this isn't happening anytime soon and we would have beaten current world energy production well before that point is reached

        => running out or raw materials:
        Plenty of time until then too, and recycling older panels could help too.

        tartley@fosstodon.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
        tartley@fosstodon.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
        tartley@fosstodon.org
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #27

        @dryak @aanee @infobeautiful I totally agree. I suppose the black-pilled establishment energy industry might expect another limiting factor would be running out of loony environmentalists to sell them too, if they could only sway public opinion sufficiently. But I agree with you, they were holding back the tide.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • martin@libera.siteM martin@libera.site
          @Jonathan Hartley Nope. You need 100% backup(from about 50% of Ren share). Fossil backup.
          That's why it's not cheap. and will not be. Never.

          #^https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunkelflaute
          tartley@fosstodon.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
          tartley@fosstodon.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
          tartley@fosstodon.org
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #28

          @martin you might need access to 100% backup while still being able to reduce your need for fossil generated energy by a majority amount - those aren't incompatible.

          martin@libera.siteM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ohir@social.vivaldi.netO ohir@social.vivaldi.net

            @dzwiedziu @infobeautiful are you asking about "lobbying" efforts (this would be R 2023/1542 and Digital Battery Passport kicking in next year). The whole regulations only skim non-patentable technologies, like lead-acid batteries. These can be operational for millenia, due to their simple chemistry. The only maintenance that must be done is on-site processing of sulfated battery plates. Something that once upon a time (1950-1990) was being done on the massive scale in Central/East Europe countries. Then lobbied country's legislative can bar mid-sized installations as unable to met the EU demands (tried recently in Poland afair).

            dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
            dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
            dzwiedziu@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #29

            @ohir
            So you're saying that to solve energy and heat storage we need sites that will have large amounts of a poisonous, bio-accumulative heavy metal working in an highly hazardous acid, and all that working within daily deep-cycling, on an industrial scale, plus constant industrial-scale recycling, and that it will be cheap and safe?

            Yeah, no citations (not counting regulation existing alone) means I'll pass.

            @infobeautiful

            ohir@social.vivaldi.netO 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • infobeautiful@vis.socialI infobeautiful@vis.social

              The world’s solar capacity reached 1,419 gigawatts in 2023, way beyond any predictions. 1 gigawatt = power for a medium sized city

              simplicator@federate.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
              simplicator@federate.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
              simplicator@federate.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #30

              @infobeautiful More than enough to power a DeLorean back to the future 🙂

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • nicolai@babka.socialN nicolai@babka.social

                @infobeautiful the IEA is famous for denying what cannot be denied until the very last minute.

                nicolai@babka.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                nicolai@babka.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                nicolai@babka.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #31

                @infobeautiful the IEA is traditionally very nuclear friendly and of course aware that solar and wind are pushing nuclear from „expensive but with enough subsidies and imperialism it might work“ into „are you ducking nuts?!?“ territory

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • tartley@fosstodon.orgT tartley@fosstodon.org

                  @martin you might need access to 100% backup while still being able to reduce your need for fossil generated energy by a majority amount - those aren't incompatible.

                  martin@libera.siteM This user is from outside of this forum
                  martin@libera.siteM This user is from outside of this forum
                  martin@libera.site
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #32
                  @Jonathan Hartley
                  That's true. But it will be expensive. Even with zero price for FV panels.

                  Or we could have a stable ☢️ and not have installations with 200% of the required performance, right...
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD dzwiedziu@mastodon.social

                    @ohir
                    So you're saying that to solve energy and heat storage we need sites that will have large amounts of a poisonous, bio-accumulative heavy metal working in an highly hazardous acid, and all that working within daily deep-cycling, on an industrial scale, plus constant industrial-scale recycling, and that it will be cheap and safe?

                    Yeah, no citations (not counting regulation existing alone) means I'll pass.

                    @infobeautiful

                    ohir@social.vivaldi.netO This user is from outside of this forum
                    ohir@social.vivaldi.netO This user is from outside of this forum
                    ohir@social.vivaldi.net
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #33

                    @dzwiedziu @infobeautiful [...] Yes! Almost every point of anti-storage propaganda repeated (the one omitted is about hydrogen being flammable).

                    Debunking:
                    1. All components of lead-acid batteries are curently _byproducts_ of other indispensable industries. Lead itself accompanies copper ores. Sulfur is a byproduct of natural gas/oil. Whether either "waste" byproduct ends up in landfills or in batteries matters.
                    2. Battery plates can be renovated on-site using very simple machines. 50yrs ago operated by humans, now can be entirely autonomous. Very small storages (house) can be renovated by mobile semi-van mounted machine.
                    3. "Highly hazardous" acid somehow is not that hazardous if used in the car battery. Nor it was when used in warehouse lifters since 1890.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD dzwiedziu@mastodon.social

                      @ohir
                      So you're saying that to solve energy and heat storage we need sites that will have large amounts of a poisonous, bio-accumulative heavy metal working in an highly hazardous acid, and all that working within daily deep-cycling, on an industrial scale, plus constant industrial-scale recycling, and that it will be cheap and safe?

                      Yeah, no citations (not counting regulation existing alone) means I'll pass.

                      @infobeautiful

                      ohir@social.vivaldi.netO This user is from outside of this forum
                      ohir@social.vivaldi.netO This user is from outside of this forum
                      ohir@social.vivaldi.net
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #34

                      @dzwiedziu @infobeautiful

                      As for the heat storage: mid-temperature heat accumulator can store around 1MWh per 1 cubic meter of gravel. Insulated by the very same gravel turned into the mineral wool. My house heat accu (I can not build on my own land) is designed to the tune of 7MWh, co it could store heat from 30kW solar installation operating from March to September. This fits into the 6m diameter rotunde. In 2020 was expected to cost around €15000. 4/5 of that the insulation. In non-lobbied regulatory environment this insulation could be made on-site from the gravel (and some amount of aluminium) by simple machine known for two centuries now.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • bitprophet@social.coopB bitprophet@social.coop

                        @infobeautiful why were people predicting a /downslope/ for so long, seems like a bizarre forecast. “Oh, solar rates have been climbing modestly for the last few years but I’m sure it’s just a passing fad…”

                        gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.placeG This user is from outside of this forum
                        gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.placeG This user is from outside of this forum
                        gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.place
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #35

                        @bitprophet @infobeautiful there is a whole book by @solar_chase from bloombergNEF on the subject.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • infobeautiful@vis.socialI infobeautiful@vis.social

                          The world’s solar capacity reached 1,419 gigawatts in 2023, way beyond any predictions. 1 gigawatt = power for a medium sized city

                          davidm_yeg@mstdn.caD This user is from outside of this forum
                          davidm_yeg@mstdn.caD This user is from outside of this forum
                          davidm_yeg@mstdn.ca
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #36

                          @infobeautiful

                          It’s almost like there’s an entrenched, wealthy, and powerful special interest group with a vested interest in discouraging investments in solar … 🤷‍♂️

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • infobeautiful@vis.socialI infobeautiful@vis.social

                            The world’s solar capacity reached 1,419 gigawatts in 2023, way beyond any predictions. 1 gigawatt = power for a medium sized city

                            jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            jiub@not.an.evilcyberhacker.net
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #37

                            @infobeautiful@vis.social this chart demonstrates how ridiculously pessimistic the IEA is, to the point of uselessness. i mean just look at it, it wasn't until 2020 where they didn't predict an actual decline in installations. pure clown shit

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • martin@libera.siteM martin@libera.site
                              @Jonathan Hartley Nope. You need 100% backup(from about 50% of Ren share). Fossil backup.
                              That's why it's not cheap. and will not be. Never.

                              #^https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunkelflaute
                              dr2chase@ohai.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                              dr2chase@ohai.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                              dr2chase@ohai.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #38

                              @martin you seem very certain, as if we could not, say grossly over provision green + batteries, and shut down some industrial processes for the tiny fraction of time when still+dark is too long.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai

                                @infobeautiful

                                Herbicides, pesticides, fertilizer and soil compaction, as well as erosion from modern farming have obliterated 40% of the world’s carbon and hydrological capacity as well as it’s fertility.

                                Industrial Farms are a biological waste land of toxic chemicals, fossil fuel emissions, herbicides, fungicides and pesticides.

                                All this to make corporations massively wealthier, while destroying the product, actual productive capacity of the land to sustain both the our climate and us

                                bhasic@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                bhasic@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                bhasic@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #39

                                @GhostOnTheHalfShell @infobeautiful https://ourworldindata.org/land-use-diets

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • bhasic@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  bhasic@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  bhasic@mastodon.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #40

                                  @GhostOnTheHalfShell @infobeautiful https://ourworldindata.org/food-choice-vs-eating-local

                                  https://ourworldindata.org/less-meat-or-sustainable-meat

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • simonjust@mstdn.dkS simonjust@mstdn.dk shared this topic
                                  Svar
                                  • Svar som emne
                                  Login for at svare
                                  • Ældste til nyeste
                                  • Nyeste til ældste
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Log ind

                                  • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                  Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Hjem
                                  • Seneste
                                  • Etiketter
                                  • Populære
                                  • Verden
                                  • Bruger
                                  • Grupper