KDE Conf just wants to *talk* about going full A slop desktop

[lumi@snug.moe]

@davidgerard "A desktop that loves you back has to know you."

"desktop that loves you back"

... do they want a relationship with their desktop via a chatbot?

what the fuck

[librarysquirrel@sunny.garden]

@davidgerard "Oh and btw what if we broke all your desktops and turned you into UI guinea pigs. I would be chased away from MS or Apple but Linux users have little power so look, what if!!!":
https://conf.kde.org/event/11/contributions/332/

[ozzelot@snac.sklenicekrtku.cz]

@davidgerard@circumstances.run
I like and currently use KDE.

I don't want my desktop to love me. I want it to launch and organize programs, notify me of things, and not get in the goddamn way.

[staticr@guild.pmdcollab.org]

@davidgerard I absolutely do not under any circumstance want my precious write cycles of my overpriced SSD wasted on an oversized slop machine that struggles at completing simple tasks while maxing out my power bill

[davidgerard@circumstances.run]

note how this promises a bunch of shit that AI coding doesn't even do slightly.

custom compiled desktops for every user! what?

(that's the Resonant Computing manifesto, a document completely detached from technical reality https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/12/17/the-resonant-computing-manifesto-same-ai-slop-same-ai-guys/ )

this "talk" looks like someone at KDE has made the decision to go slop and is trying to generate the appearance of consent. you've seen this playbook repeatedly.

also this abstract was written with a chatbot

[skyfaller@jawns.club]

@lumi @zzt @davidgerard spoken like someone who isn't fucking their desktop

[dysfun@social.treehouse.systems]

@davidgerard you know there are incredible opportunities available for productive LLM use when they resort to pointless ideas.

[elliessurviving@tech.lgbt]

@davidgerard oh god fuck no not kde, fuck fuck fuck

[luna@lunar.place]

@davidgerard@circumstances.run i hope that talk does not go well

[dmitrylitosh@mastodon.social]

@davidgerard sir we have custom desktops, its called compiz for gnome 2.0, please follow me to this room please

[zzt@mas.to]

@davidgerard > custom compiled desktops for every user! what?

the codegooners keep promising this with LLMs

I actually do this! people are gonna fucking hate it if I ever release it because it turns your whole environment into an editor, but unlike the LLM bros I’m realistic about what fucking software looks like

[lumi@snug.moe]

@skyfaller @zzt @davidgerard so sad that computers don't have cd-rom drives anymore...

[fred@social.fthevenet.eu]

@librarysquirrel @davidgerard

"[...] turned you into UI guinea pigs".

Yeah... I thought that was Gnome's job?!?

[lproven@social.vivaldi.net]

@davidgerard

[librarysquirrel@sunny.garden]

@fred @davidgerard division of labour struggles in the FOSS world I reckon...

[png@yap.pony.biz]

@davidgerard
> what would it take for KDE to be the desktop people actively choose, not just the one some of us settle for?

I do just love the lack of self-awareness in this sentence, this conference talk is the exact answer to the opposite question. Plenty of people actively stay away from software that's "AI-native", so AI is clearly not the answer to making a desktop people would actively choose.

[elliessurviving@tech.lgbt]

@ozzelot @davidgerard as a kde user myself, exactly the same

[astromateusz@fediscience.org]

@davidgerard no no no no, not like this...

[mensrea@freeradical.zone]

@lumi @skyfaller @davidgerard @zzt some fun trivia: in south africa 3.5in floppies used to be called stiffy disks. so we had stiffy drives. was good times

[lazyb0y@mastodon.social]

@davidgerard

sir i dont want my desktop
to „love me back“ - the thing i love (haha) about computers is that they can be (totally in theory, sometimes it happens actually in practice) deterministic without emotional baggage and all the complications it usually brings…

actually my love here is totally NOT unconditional but hard bound to the thing to work and not annoy or surprise me