Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. An open letter to office suite users, just before the Euro-Office announcement

An open letter to office suite users, just before the Euro-Office announcement

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
digitalsovereiglibreofficeodf
88 Indlæg 45 Posters 1 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • karlggestd@mastodon.socialK karlggestd@mastodon.social

    @ocdtrekkie @zandbelt @libreoffice

    OOXML specifications include things as "spaceline as in Word 97". Since spaceline in Word 97 is closed, OOXML is closed.

    Microsoft can spend millions paying lot of people to convince someone that OOXML is open, but, precisely, specifications are there to anyone who want to check.

    ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
    ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
    ocdtrekkie@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #64

    @karlggestd @zandbelt @libreoffice It doesn't have to be a good open standard to be an open standard. But that isn't really the point: Most organizations today use Microsoft Office. We can all agree that's bad, right?

    The only office software that isn't *dead on arrival* is software with great compatibility with Microsoft Office. So why is LibreOffice advertising incompatibility when it works great?

    karlggestd@mastodon.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO ocdtrekkie@mastodon.social

      @karlggestd @zandbelt @libreoffice The funny thing is LibreOffice has great Microsoft Office support, there's no reason today a business can't drop in LibreOffice. The marketing at LibreOffice however has simply chosen a completely losing strategy, to ignore their own strengths and simultaneously advertise themselves as incapable of replacing Microsoft Office in organizational use.

      karlggestd@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
      karlggestd@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
      karlggestd@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #65

      @ocdtrekkie @zandbelt @libreoffice
      You mention LibreOffice's marketing, but you're referring to an understandable decision: sticking with their own format. Are you confusing proper support for a format with "saving by default"?

      None of this explains why OnlyOffice doesn't have better usage figures. You're making assumptions without any basis.

      ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO ocdtrekkie@mastodon.social

        @karlggestd @zandbelt @libreoffice It doesn't have to be a good open standard to be an open standard. But that isn't really the point: Most organizations today use Microsoft Office. We can all agree that's bad, right?

        The only office software that isn't *dead on arrival* is software with great compatibility with Microsoft Office. So why is LibreOffice advertising incompatibility when it works great?

        karlggestd@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
        karlggestd@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
        karlggestd@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #66

        @ocdtrekkie @zandbelt @libreoffice

        No, it is true. ODF is not a good standard anyway.

        But include things you can't replicate. Then it is closed. Paying people can't change the nature of the code.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • libreoffice@fosstodon.orgL libreoffice@fosstodon.org

          An open letter to office suite users, just before the Euro-Office announcement

          https://blog.documentfoundation.org/blog/2026/06/08/an-open-letter/

          #digitalsovereignty #libreoffice #odf

          rubenwa@social.vivaldi.netR This user is from outside of this forum
          rubenwa@social.vivaldi.netR This user is from outside of this forum
          rubenwa@social.vivaldi.net
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #67

          @libreoffice Hear Hear!!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • libreoffice@fosstodon.orgL libreoffice@fosstodon.org

            An open letter to office suite users, just before the Euro-Office announcement

            https://blog.documentfoundation.org/blog/2026/06/08/an-open-letter/

            #digitalsovereignty #libreoffice #odf

            kaiserkiwi@corteximplant.comK This user is from outside of this forum
            kaiserkiwi@corteximplant.comK This user is from outside of this forum
            kaiserkiwi@corteximplant.com
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #68

            @libreoffice You should check on the contrast again.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • libreoffice@fosstodon.orgL libreoffice@fosstodon.org

              An open letter to office suite users, just before the Euro-Office announcement

              https://blog.documentfoundation.org/blog/2026/06/08/an-open-letter/

              #digitalsovereignty #libreoffice #odf

              hobart@uwu.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
              hobart@uwu.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
              hobart@uwu.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #69

              @libreoffice
              https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/743:_Infrastructures

              murraywindripper@fosstodon.orgM bartfoss42@mastodon.socialB 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • karlggestd@mastodon.socialK karlggestd@mastodon.social

                @ocdtrekkie @zandbelt @libreoffice
                You mention LibreOffice's marketing, but you're referring to an understandable decision: sticking with their own format. Are you confusing proper support for a format with "saving by default"?

                None of this explains why OnlyOffice doesn't have better usage figures. You're making assumptions without any basis.

                ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                ocdtrekkie@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #70

                @karlggestd @zandbelt @libreoffice I think LibreOffice defaulting to saving in ODF is not only fine, but a good thing. It means if we can transition organizations to LibreOffice, they will likely start transiting organically to ODF (which Microsoft Office also supports quite well!).

                The problem is the author of this blog who constantly acts like OOXML is incompatible and bad and that the only way to get freedom is to switch to ODF. And that is a dumb and backwards marketing approach.

                ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO karlggestd@mastodon.socialK 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO ocdtrekkie@mastodon.social

                  @karlggestd @zandbelt @libreoffice I think LibreOffice defaulting to saving in ODF is not only fine, but a good thing. It means if we can transition organizations to LibreOffice, they will likely start transiting organically to ODF (which Microsoft Office also supports quite well!).

                  The problem is the author of this blog who constantly acts like OOXML is incompatible and bad and that the only way to get freedom is to switch to ODF. And that is a dumb and backwards marketing approach.

                  ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                  ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                  ocdtrekkie@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #71

                  @karlggestd @zandbelt @libreoffice We should not be trying to tell people they need to switch to open things for open things' sake. That has never worked, it hasn't worked for the past thirty years, and it won't start working in the next thirty.

                  If you want to switch organizations over to LibreOffice, it needs to do what they need it to do: work with Microsoft Office, which is what everyone else they talk to uses (which it does!) and be cheaper (which it is!)

                  ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO ocdtrekkie@mastodon.social

                    @karlggestd @zandbelt @libreoffice We should not be trying to tell people they need to switch to open things for open things' sake. That has never worked, it hasn't worked for the past thirty years, and it won't start working in the next thirty.

                    If you want to switch organizations over to LibreOffice, it needs to do what they need it to do: work with Microsoft Office, which is what everyone else they talk to uses (which it does!) and be cheaper (which it is!)

                    ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                    ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                    ocdtrekkie@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #72

                    @karlggestd @zandbelt @libreoffice And in this case, he has spun so far off the rails, he's now trashing a different open source project for being better at marketing to Office customers and meeting their needs than he is. Rather than just... fixing his marketing strategy.

                    karlggestd@mastodon.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • karlggestd@mastodon.socialK karlggestd@mastodon.social

                      @ocdtrekkie @zandbelt @libreoffice

                      OOXML specifications include things as "spaceline as in Word 97". Since spaceline in Word 97 is closed, OOXML is closed.

                      Microsoft can spend millions paying lot of people to convince someone that OOXML is open, but, precisely, specifications are there to anyone who want to check.

                      ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                      ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                      ocdtrekkie@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #73

                      @karlggestd @zandbelt @libreoffice As long as what you need to include in the file to match that behavior is in the standard and it's permissible to use that in your files, there's nothing that prevents OOXML from being a standard if it says "match this behavior".

                      If I said every file had to start with WJGKWJF@ for no apparent reason, it'd be no different than some unchangeable string of binary. And it could still be part of a standard that you need to include it even if you can't change it.

                      karlggestd@mastodon.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO ocdtrekkie@mastodon.social

                        @karlggestd @zandbelt @libreoffice I think LibreOffice defaulting to saving in ODF is not only fine, but a good thing. It means if we can transition organizations to LibreOffice, they will likely start transiting organically to ODF (which Microsoft Office also supports quite well!).

                        The problem is the author of this blog who constantly acts like OOXML is incompatible and bad and that the only way to get freedom is to switch to ODF. And that is a dumb and backwards marketing approach.

                        karlggestd@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                        karlggestd@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                        karlggestd@mastodon.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #74

                        @ocdtrekkie @zandbelt @libreoffice but in fact OXML is bad and incompatible and a lot of things.

                        Marketing from LibreOffice is bad, and some policies or decisions are bad too. I'm agreed in this.

                        But OOXML is only a standard because Microsoft paid people time ago to approve the ISO standard. Nothing more.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO ocdtrekkie@mastodon.social

                          @karlggestd @zandbelt @libreoffice And in this case, he has spun so far off the rails, he's now trashing a different open source project for being better at marketing to Office customers and meeting their needs than he is. Rather than just... fixing his marketing strategy.

                          karlggestd@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                          karlggestd@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                          karlggestd@mastodon.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #75

                          @ocdtrekkie @zandbelt @libreoffice

                          What LibreOffice should be doing is subtly different. Instead of using "save as OOXML by default," it should ensure that the "Open" dialog box displays any ODF or OOXML document for selection without any hassle. THAT would be a real improvement. And apparently, it's doing that now.

                          And perhaps offering to save the native format just once, instead of every time 😀 And more importantly: manage them as best as possible. And improve PDF support.

                          ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO ocdtrekkie@mastodon.social

                            @karlggestd @zandbelt @libreoffice As long as what you need to include in the file to match that behavior is in the standard and it's permissible to use that in your files, there's nothing that prevents OOXML from being a standard if it says "match this behavior".

                            If I said every file had to start with WJGKWJF@ for no apparent reason, it'd be no different than some unchangeable string of binary. And it could still be part of a standard that you need to include it even if you can't change it.

                            karlggestd@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                            karlggestd@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                            karlggestd@mastodon.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #76

                            @ocdtrekkie @zandbelt @libreoffice But it is no there.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • karlggestd@mastodon.socialK karlggestd@mastodon.social

                              @ocdtrekkie @zandbelt @libreoffice

                              What LibreOffice should be doing is subtly different. Instead of using "save as OOXML by default," it should ensure that the "Open" dialog box displays any ODF or OOXML document for selection without any hassle. THAT would be a real improvement. And apparently, it's doing that now.

                              And perhaps offering to save the native format just once, instead of every time 😀 And more importantly: manage them as best as possible. And improve PDF support.

                              ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                              ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                              ocdtrekkie@mastodon.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #77

                              @karlggestd @zandbelt @libreoffice Yes. IMHO the best direction for LibreOffice is to make the formats *not matter* such that nobody cares that they stopped saving docx and started saving odt at some point. The less it matters the more people can comfortably switch to open software.

                              karlggestd@mastodon.socialK 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO ocdtrekkie@mastodon.social

                                @karlggestd @zandbelt @libreoffice Yes. IMHO the best direction for LibreOffice is to make the formats *not matter* such that nobody cares that they stopped saving docx and started saving odt at some point. The less it matters the more people can comfortably switch to open software.

                                karlggestd@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                karlggestd@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                karlggestd@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #78

                                @ocdtrekkie
                                The best aprox is "create new as ODF, save in the last time saved".

                                @zandbelt @libreoffice

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • libreoffice@fosstodon.orgL libreoffice@fosstodon.org

                                  An open letter to office suite users, just before the Euro-Office announcement

                                  https://blog.documentfoundation.org/blog/2026/06/08/an-open-letter/

                                  #digitalsovereignty #libreoffice #odf

                                  47363@norden.social4 This user is from outside of this forum
                                  47363@norden.social4 This user is from outside of this forum
                                  47363@norden.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #79

                                  @libreoffice

                                  Is that a picture attached to your post?
                                  Is that picture a PNG with transparent background?

                                  Well, whatever it is, it's unreadable/ unrecognisable what's supposed to be showing.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • ocdtrekkie@mastodon.socialO ocdtrekkie@mastodon.social

                                    @karlggestd @zandbelt @libreoffice Yes. IMHO the best direction for LibreOffice is to make the formats *not matter* such that nobody cares that they stopped saving docx and started saving odt at some point. The less it matters the more people can comfortably switch to open software.

                                    karlggestd@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    karlggestd@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    karlggestd@mastodon.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #80

                                    @ocdtrekkie
                                    A different aprox:

                                    https://www.collaboraonline.com/blog/you-are-not-sovereign-if-microsoft-still-architects-your-documents/

                                    @zandbelt @libreoffice

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • hobart@uwu.socialH hobart@uwu.social

                                      @libreoffice
                                      https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/743:_Infrastructures

                                      murraywindripper@fosstodon.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      murraywindripper@fosstodon.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      murraywindripper@fosstodon.org
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #81

                                      @hobart
                                      I normally like xkcd but knocking neurodivergency for shits and giggles seems a bit weird.
                                      @libreoffice

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • jmbmkn@mastodon.scotJ jmbmkn@mastodon.scot

                                        @libreoffice Thanks for the extra info about Euro Office. Is it known why they have chosen to default to OOXML, is there a limitation in ODF that they don't put the work in to implement? I understand that might be something only they can answer, but you seem to have done research on it.

                                        askaaron@troet.cafeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        askaaron@troet.cafeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        askaaron@troet.cafe
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #82

                                        @jmbmkn @libreoffice Euro Office is a fork of OnlyOffice which uses OOXML internally.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • libreoffice@fosstodon.orgL libreoffice@fosstodon.org

                                          An open letter to office suite users, just before the Euro-Office announcement

                                          https://blog.documentfoundation.org/blog/2026/06/08/an-open-letter/

                                          #digitalsovereignty #libreoffice #odf

                                          dunklecat@mastodon.dunklecat.devD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          dunklecat@mastodon.dunklecat.devD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          dunklecat@mastodon.dunklecat.dev
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #83

                                          @libreoffice I thank you for your open letter, and I'm going to take advantage of it to ask you: are you going to abandon Github in the foreseeable future? If I'm not mistaken your official repositories are here: https://github.com/LibreOffice

                                          I'm wrong, they're at https://git.libreoffice.org/

                                          libreoffice@fosstodon.orgL 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper