I spent quite a bit of time on BlueSky for several months and found that if you’re a nobody there is close to no engagement.

[urlyman@mastodon.social]

@Remittancegirl agreed.

I know it’s probably an over-simplification but I think quite often about how indigenous cultures developed techniques for suppressing egotistical bullshit and lasted tens of thousands of years and how algorithmic media is the opposite

[tg9541@mas.to]

@urlyman Why should I reply to this one? Oh, I just did that? Shee...

[remittancegirl@mstdn.social]

@urlyman I don't think that is an oversimplification at all, actually. It addresses the structural aspect of the discourse.

[darthastrius@mastodon.social]

@urlyman yeah I got that vibe too. BlueSky was more diverse, though, but god it sucked. Such a toxic platform. Basically 2019 Twitter.

[geos@toot.community]

@urlyman It seems like another "Talk At" platform vs. a "Talk To" platform.
I am here to talk to people.

[urlyman@mastodon.social]

@DarthAstrius after several months my overwhelming feeling was disappointment: that it was like speaking into a void, and yet so many were enraptured by its ‘stickiness’

[hydropsyche@ecoevo.social]

@t_var_s @urlyman @KimSJ Most of the people going viral on BlueSky already have a day job. BlueSky isn't really a place that influencers make a living just influencing.

[hydropsyche@ecoevo.social]

@urlyman I am a woman scientist. Reply guys are everywhere. At least on Mastodon, it's easy to add a personal note on their profile the first time they're obnoxious, and then block them the second time. And if they really cross the line, report them to their server and they actually face consequences.

[urlyman@mastodon.social]

@hydropsyche I wish you didn’t have to face them, but I’m pleased the ecosystem is better at addressing them

[patrick_h_lauke@mastodon.social]

@urlyman bsky feels mostly "libertarian/status quo" to me, while masto leans more towards "socialist/anarchic" (with the pinch of salt of "it'll depend on who you follow" etc of course)

[idoodle@mastodon.social]

@urlyman

[nicelymanifest@mastodon.social]

@urlyman Very much so. The human mind seems to gravitate far too much towards those in the spotlight, ignoring lots of great stuff in the shadows.

[wtl@mastodon.social]

@urlyman @ElbowsUpforDigitalSovereignty Agreed.

[p__x@mastodon.social]

@urlyman in my field, people made the Xodus right after the election and the Bsky handles started popping up after presentations. I personally never understood the love for Twitter, it's inundated w/ bots, and now Bsky just appeals as a Twitter copy in its inevitable prenazification phase.

There's a lot less engagement on Mastodon, and the federation of comments is quite clunky. But it takes me back to the internet before The Algorithm, and I'd rather interact with 5 humans, than argue w bots.

[losefriendsandalienatepeople@mastodon.social]

I use open vibe and connect to Bluesky, Nostr, and Mastodon in one app. They just added Tumblr.
It's a good solution

[fruitcakesareyum@mastodon.social]

@urlyman

I go back and forth in most places, as a random unknown. I'm not a very social person but I don't have anyone to talk to offline. So I really do need social media, or I'll lose my mind.

BS is absolute chaos, I never understand how to use it.

But here, every time without fail I can jump into a conversation on my first day, and people reply or fav (as read receipts) my words. And I don't have to think most of them are bots, so it makes me feel seen.

[wesley@theatl.social]

@urlyman I hop between Mastodon and Bluesky. Personally I find value in them both.

There are a lot more big accounts posting on Bluesky, but I enjoy the slower paced more community-based interactions of Mastodon. I also like that Mastodon allows for a lot more nuance with larger character limits even getting into more long form posts (such as the OP which is fairly long and would have been a lengthy thread on bsky) which makes for better discussions.

In my experience Bluesky is better for low-effort short posts and broadcasting from large accounts to a wider audience whereas Mastodon is better for nuanced discussions and has a more level playing field between large and small accounts.

[el_coyote@mastodon.social]

@urlyman I was in BlueSky for a while too…. but it’s too political, and also quite discriminative of single fathers. If you have NO political opinion there, you’re a nobody, who nobody trusts. You’re considered a “red flag” if you don’t support the left. Other platforms consider you a “red flag “ if you don’t support the right.

I love the Fediverse! It gives the finger to both.

[mycos@mastodon.social]

@urlyman Really? That's interesting, as I'm trying out Mastodon and coming from Bluesky, I interact with people frequently there. Yet, I only have 20-something followers, none of whom know me IRL.

[dodo1095zd@mastodon.social]

@urlyman používám obojí, chce to jen čas...