Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. ⚠️ A reminder that like all social networks Mastodon is not end-to-end encrypted.

⚠️ A reminder that like all social networks Mastodon is not end-to-end encrypted.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
38 Indlæg 13 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • voxel@infosec.spaceV voxel@infosec.space

    @FediTips

    Another fact is that Signal is run by the billionaire who sold Whatsapp to Meta. It seems reasonable to be concerned he might do it again to get even richer.

    That's as far I can tell misinformation, please provide a reliable source for this claim.

    feditips@social.growyourown.servicesF This user is from outside of this forum
    feditips@social.growyourown.servicesF This user is from outside of this forum
    feditips@social.growyourown.services
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #28

    @voxel

    Brian Acton set up Whatsapp and sold it to Meta.

    Brian Acton set up Signal and is currently in charge of it.

    Here is the legal filing showing he is CEO, Secretary and CFO of the Signal Foundation which owns Signal:

    https://bizfileonline.sos.ca.gov/api/report/GetImageByNum/118234220019123101066088064058060110220205102189

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • feditips@social.growyourown.servicesF feditips@social.growyourown.services

      ⚠️ A reminder that like all social networks Mastodon is not end-to-end encrypted. It is not designed or intended as a way to send sensitive information.

      If you need to send private messages with sensitive content, use a secure messenger with end-to-end encryption both present and activated.

      Some options are XMPP with OMEMO (https://joinjabber.org), @delta & @briar

      Another is Signal, but Signal is centralised which makes it more vulnerable to enshittification or selling itself to Meta etc.

      tswerts@mstdn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      tswerts@mstdn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      tswerts@mstdn.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #29

      @briar @delta @FediTips
      I followed the advice for installing XMPP.
      But without contacts 😢
      What's a good way to get people to also sign up? Is starting with chat-groups the best way?

      feditips@social.growyourown.servicesF 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • tswerts@mstdn.socialT tswerts@mstdn.social

        @briar @delta @FediTips
        I followed the advice for installing XMPP.
        But without contacts 😢
        What's a good way to get people to also sign up? Is starting with chat-groups the best way?

        feditips@social.growyourown.servicesF This user is from outside of this forum
        feditips@social.growyourown.servicesF This user is from outside of this forum
        feditips@social.growyourown.services
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #30

        @tswerts

        The idea of https://joinjabber.org is to give people an easy way to get started, so I guess it might be useful to encourage others to sign up there and then exchange addresses with them so you can add them to your contacts.

        It works in a similar way to the Fediverse, if you exchange addresses you can follow each other even if your server hasn't noticed their account yet.

        If you want to set up your own server, @snikket_im is an excellent option which suits non-tech people too.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • stonebear2@hachyderm.ioS stonebear2@hachyderm.io

          @FediTips @briar @delta You can also turn on "delete after X amount of time" on Signal which can mitigate enshittification... I mean, yes, doing FOSS-distributed e2ee is *best*, but as St. Linus once said, never let perfect get in the way of good enough.

          feditips@social.growyourown.servicesF This user is from outside of this forum
          feditips@social.growyourown.servicesF This user is from outside of this forum
          feditips@social.growyourown.services
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #31

          @stonebear2

          Enshittification doesn't happen in the growth phase. In the growth phase everything is great and users are treated like royalty.

          But when a network becomes so dominant that people feel forced to use it (such as Whatsapp) then the enshittification can start, because people can't escape any more.

          The more people that congregate on a centralised service, the closer you are bringing that service to enshittification, and the more people will be trapped on it.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • rubinjoni@mastodon.socialR rubinjoni@mastodon.social

            @FediTips @danielnazer Also, it's published at the Apple App Store by Signal Messenger LLC. Brian Acton is the CEO of Signal Messenger LLC, and chairman of Signal Foundation. Right now, Signal is the best "daily driver" messenger. It is in risk of enshittification (we're looking at you, Mozilla!), but right now it is the secure option that just works.

            feditips@social.growyourown.servicesF This user is from outside of this forum
            feditips@social.growyourown.servicesF This user is from outside of this forum
            feditips@social.growyourown.services
            wrote sidst redigeret af feditips@social.growyourown.services
            #32

            @rubinjoni

            Signal just works because it's centralised and gets lots of money from a billionaire.

            This is the same path Whatsapp took, with the same guy in charge. The more people use it the closer it gets to that fate.

            I get that Signal so much easier than other options, but that ease of use is for all the wrong reasons: centralisation and billionaire cash.

            rubinjoni@mastodon.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • feditips@social.growyourown.servicesF feditips@social.growyourown.services

              @rubinjoni

              Signal just works because it's centralised and gets lots of money from a billionaire.

              This is the same path Whatsapp took, with the same guy in charge. The more people use it the closer it gets to that fate.

              I get that Signal so much easier than other options, but that ease of use is for all the wrong reasons: centralisation and billionaire cash.

              rubinjoni@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
              rubinjoni@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
              rubinjoni@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #33

              @FediTips We can't all be radio operators using single-use tabs...

              feditips@social.growyourown.servicesF 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • rubinjoni@mastodon.socialR rubinjoni@mastodon.social

                @FediTips We can't all be radio operators using single-use tabs...

                feditips@social.growyourown.servicesF This user is from outside of this forum
                feditips@social.growyourown.servicesF This user is from outside of this forum
                feditips@social.growyourown.services
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #34

                @rubinjoni

                If people can set up and use email, they can set up and use XMPP.

                rubinjoni@mastodon.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • feditips@social.growyourown.servicesF feditips@social.growyourown.services

                  @rubinjoni

                  If people can set up and use email, they can set up and use XMPP.

                  rubinjoni@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                  rubinjoni@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                  rubinjoni@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #35

                  @FediTips I ran my own Prosody server for a while, on my own physical machine. Couldn't onboard people who are not 100% into FOSS to use mobile phone apps like Conversations. The best I could do is Signal.

                  feditips@social.growyourown.servicesF 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • rubinjoni@mastodon.socialR rubinjoni@mastodon.social

                    @FediTips I ran my own Prosody server for a while, on my own physical machine. Couldn't onboard people who are not 100% into FOSS to use mobile phone apps like Conversations. The best I could do is Signal.

                    feditips@social.growyourown.servicesF This user is from outside of this forum
                    feditips@social.growyourown.servicesF This user is from outside of this forum
                    feditips@social.growyourown.services
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #36

                    @rubinjoni

                    What did they struggle with in the onboarding? Did they give you feedback about it?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • feditips@social.growyourown.servicesF feditips@social.growyourown.services

                      @beachcomber

                      Yes, have seen that.

                      They write: "(Federated networks) can feel like you’re controlling your own destiny, whether or not that’s true. And those emotions can be a powerful thing."

                      It's kind of patronising and arrogant, implying that those who value decentralisation are deluding themselves for emotional reasons 🙄

                      Sort of difficult to take the author seriously when they won't take the reader seriously.

                      They also don't say what happens if Signal's owner sells out to Meta again.

                      villasbc@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                      villasbc@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                      villasbc@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #37

                      @FediTips @beachcomber > Sort of difficult to take the author seriously when they won't take the reader seriously.

                      It is difficult, but you should be able to do it. Don’t discard the valid parts of the criticism just because the author is not writing this without biases. There are good points made in the article, even though I don’t think PGP is “stupid”.

                      feditips@social.growyourown.servicesF 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • villasbc@mastodon.socialV villasbc@mastodon.social

                        @FediTips @beachcomber > Sort of difficult to take the author seriously when they won't take the reader seriously.

                        It is difficult, but you should be able to do it. Don’t discard the valid parts of the criticism just because the author is not writing this without biases. There are good points made in the article, even though I don’t think PGP is “stupid”.

                        feditips@social.growyourown.servicesF This user is from outside of this forum
                        feditips@social.growyourown.servicesF This user is from outside of this forum
                        feditips@social.growyourown.services
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #38

                        @villasbc

                        Fair enough! My main problem with the article though is it doesn't say what happens if Signal enshittifies. Even if Signal has the best encryption in the world now, it can change in the future.

                        Lots of centralised services start out really good and useful, but then turn bad when they get into a dominant position and have users locked in. There's just no easy way to leave a popular centralised messenger service, all your contacts are there.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Svar
                        • Svar som emne
                        Login for at svare
                        • Ældste til nyeste
                        • Nyeste til ældste
                        • Most Votes


                        • Log ind

                        • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        Graciously hosted by data.coop
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Hjem
                        • Seneste
                        • Etiketter
                        • Populære
                        • Verden
                        • Bruger
                        • Grupper