Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Trump is emboldened and dangerous.

Trump is emboldened and dangerous.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
greenlandworldusapeace
16 Indlæg 6 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • chris@mstdn.chrisalemany.caC chris@mstdn.chrisalemany.ca

    Trump is emboldened and dangerous. Now he says Russia or China will take #Greenland if the USA doesn't.

    Americans.

    Please.

    This man is unwell.

    Protest in the streets until he leaves. Do it for yourself and your country, but also for the safety of the world.

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/09/trump-greenland-threats-white-house

    #world #usa #peace

    reallyflygreg@mstdn.caR This user is from outside of this forum
    reallyflygreg@mstdn.caR This user is from outside of this forum
    reallyflygreg@mstdn.ca
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #6

    @chris he's definitely unwell, among many other horrible things, but he's part of the larger plan laid out by neoliberals remaking the world order.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • steter@mastodon.stevesworld.coS steter@mastodon.stevesworld.co

      @jfmezei @chris He's been impeached twice. The Senate holds the power in this country. They can stop this on any day that ends in a y. They don't need another goddamned piece of paper from a TV spectacle to get there, but the House will oblige if the Senate would DO ITS FUCKING JOB.

      Make up your minds, senators. It's your child raping cult, or the people who now see you for the scum you are, with more guns than there are humans, and considerably more bullets.

      We are armed to the teeth, here, in America, where a federal government Proud Boy goon shot a woman in the face 4 fucking times at point-blank range, then called her a "fucking bitch."

      End of civics lecture.

      jfmezei@mstdn.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jfmezei@mstdn.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jfmezei@mstdn.ca
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #7

      @steter @chris I am curious onthe definition of "impeached". yes, the Orange Outang was charged with crimes and misdemeanors twice, but Senate found him not guilty, so once Senate rejects the charges, can he still be called "impeached" ?

      (Clinton was charged for lying about having sex in the oval office and Senate failed to convict, yet they still sayd "impeached".).

      The fact that the Ourang Outang was re-elected despite mounting insurection and total disrespect for law, stealing confidential docs etc essentially voids all those accusations (which was Trump,s goal in running again). And with Supreme court declaring his has immunity while president, Shirley you should expect him to take advantage of this 4 years "get out of jail" card ?

      steter@mastodon.stevesworld.coS tiamat271@mastodon.onlineT 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • jfmezei@mstdn.caJ jfmezei@mstdn.ca

        @steter @chris I am curious onthe definition of "impeached". yes, the Orange Outang was charged with crimes and misdemeanors twice, but Senate found him not guilty, so once Senate rejects the charges, can he still be called "impeached" ?

        (Clinton was charged for lying about having sex in the oval office and Senate failed to convict, yet they still sayd "impeached".).

        The fact that the Ourang Outang was re-elected despite mounting insurection and total disrespect for law, stealing confidential docs etc essentially voids all those accusations (which was Trump,s goal in running again). And with Supreme court declaring his has immunity while president, Shirley you should expect him to take advantage of this 4 years "get out of jail" card ?

        steter@mastodon.stevesworld.coS This user is from outside of this forum
        steter@mastodon.stevesworld.coS This user is from outside of this forum
        steter@mastodon.stevesworld.co
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #8

        @jfmezei @chris Impeachment occurs in the House. It is an official notice to the Senate that they want the POTUS removed. The Senate then votes on whether to remove POTUS.

        Joe Biden chose to not provide the Senate with evidence from the impeachment, and the Senate, in Republican hands anyway, rejected both impeachments by the House.

        The removal from office occurs after impeachment.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jfmezei@mstdn.caJ jfmezei@mstdn.ca

          @steter @chris I am curious onthe definition of "impeached". yes, the Orange Outang was charged with crimes and misdemeanors twice, but Senate found him not guilty, so once Senate rejects the charges, can he still be called "impeached" ?

          (Clinton was charged for lying about having sex in the oval office and Senate failed to convict, yet they still sayd "impeached".).

          The fact that the Ourang Outang was re-elected despite mounting insurection and total disrespect for law, stealing confidential docs etc essentially voids all those accusations (which was Trump,s goal in running again). And with Supreme court declaring his has immunity while president, Shirley you should expect him to take advantage of this 4 years "get out of jail" card ?

          tiamat271@mastodon.onlineT This user is from outside of this forum
          tiamat271@mastodon.onlineT This user is from outside of this forum
          tiamat271@mastodon.online
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #9

          @jfmezei @steter @chris The House of Representatives brings articles of impeachment (basically bringing charges) against the president. Then they refer it to the Senate, which holds a trial. After the trial, the Senate votes to convict or not. If convicted, the president is removed from office and may also subsequently be barred from future federal office.

          tiamat271@mastodon.onlineT 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • tiamat271@mastodon.onlineT tiamat271@mastodon.online

            @jfmezei @steter @chris The House of Representatives brings articles of impeachment (basically bringing charges) against the president. Then they refer it to the Senate, which holds a trial. After the trial, the Senate votes to convict or not. If convicted, the president is removed from office and may also subsequently be barred from future federal office.

            tiamat271@mastodon.onlineT This user is from outside of this forum
            tiamat271@mastodon.onlineT This user is from outside of this forum
            tiamat271@mastodon.online
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #10

            @jfmezei @steter @chris So impeachment is the first step, which leads to a trial, which can then lead to removal. Trump has been impeached twice, but not convicted, and therefore was not removed from office or barred from holding office again.

            jfmezei@mstdn.caJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • tiamat271@mastodon.onlineT tiamat271@mastodon.online

              @jfmezei @steter @chris So impeachment is the first step, which leads to a trial, which can then lead to removal. Trump has been impeached twice, but not convicted, and therefore was not removed from office or barred from holding office again.

              jfmezei@mstdn.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jfmezei@mstdn.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jfmezei@mstdn.ca
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #11

              @tiamat271 @steter @chris If I am accused of stealing a chocolate bar, and a court finds me not guilty after I provide evidence (the invoice), I can no longer be called "guilty of stealing a chocolate bar".

              That is why I am curious why the House accusation sticks around after Senate find the president "not guilty".

              steter@mastodon.stevesworld.coS tiamat271@mastodon.onlineT 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • jfmezei@mstdn.caJ jfmezei@mstdn.ca

                @tiamat271 @steter @chris If I am accused of stealing a chocolate bar, and a court finds me not guilty after I provide evidence (the invoice), I can no longer be called "guilty of stealing a chocolate bar".

                That is why I am curious why the House accusation sticks around after Senate find the president "not guilty".

                steter@mastodon.stevesworld.coS This user is from outside of this forum
                steter@mastodon.stevesworld.coS This user is from outside of this forum
                steter@mastodon.stevesworld.co
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #12

                @jfmezei @tiamat271 @chris It doesn't. As I said, anytime the Senate signals it wants to do something, the House will impeach him again. It could happen before the midterms. It definitely will happen after them.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jfmezei@mstdn.caJ jfmezei@mstdn.ca

                  @tiamat271 @steter @chris If I am accused of stealing a chocolate bar, and a court finds me not guilty after I provide evidence (the invoice), I can no longer be called "guilty of stealing a chocolate bar".

                  That is why I am curious why the House accusation sticks around after Senate find the president "not guilty".

                  tiamat271@mastodon.onlineT This user is from outside of this forum
                  tiamat271@mastodon.onlineT This user is from outside of this forum
                  tiamat271@mastodon.online
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #13

                  @jfmezei @steter @chris it’s kind of like being charged or indicted. No matter the outcome, the historical record of your being charged or indicted remains. So the statement, “you have been charged with candy bar theft twice” is still factual, even with no conviction. In addition, the impeachment and removal process is not a criminal proceeding, it’s a political procedure, so it doesn’t follow the same rules/procedures as a criminal trial.

                  tiamat271@mastodon.onlineT 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • tiamat271@mastodon.onlineT tiamat271@mastodon.online

                    @jfmezei @steter @chris it’s kind of like being charged or indicted. No matter the outcome, the historical record of your being charged or indicted remains. So the statement, “you have been charged with candy bar theft twice” is still factual, even with no conviction. In addition, the impeachment and removal process is not a criminal proceeding, it’s a political procedure, so it doesn’t follow the same rules/procedures as a criminal trial.

                    tiamat271@mastodon.onlineT This user is from outside of this forum
                    tiamat271@mastodon.onlineT This user is from outside of this forum
                    tiamat271@mastodon.online
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #14

                    @jfmezei @steter @chris Another reason that it’s a notable thing to mention is that impeachment is such a rare occurrence (and removal even more so…it’s never happened in our history) and trump is the only pres ever to be impeached multiple times. As a result, it’s an important political and historical event, even without conviction in the Senate. Not sure if I’m explaining things well, I hope that helps. It’s a pretty complicated system.

                    steter@mastodon.stevesworld.coS jfmezei@mstdn.caJ 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • tiamat271@mastodon.onlineT tiamat271@mastodon.online

                      @jfmezei @steter @chris Another reason that it’s a notable thing to mention is that impeachment is such a rare occurrence (and removal even more so…it’s never happened in our history) and trump is the only pres ever to be impeached multiple times. As a result, it’s an important political and historical event, even without conviction in the Senate. Not sure if I’m explaining things well, I hope that helps. It’s a pretty complicated system.

                      steter@mastodon.stevesworld.coS This user is from outside of this forum
                      steter@mastodon.stevesworld.coS This user is from outside of this forum
                      steter@mastodon.stevesworld.co
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #15

                      @tiamat271 @jfmezei @chris 👍

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • tiamat271@mastodon.onlineT tiamat271@mastodon.online

                        @jfmezei @steter @chris Another reason that it’s a notable thing to mention is that impeachment is such a rare occurrence (and removal even more so…it’s never happened in our history) and trump is the only pres ever to be impeached multiple times. As a result, it’s an important political and historical event, even without conviction in the Senate. Not sure if I’m explaining things well, I hope that helps. It’s a pretty complicated system.

                        jfmezei@mstdn.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jfmezei@mstdn.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jfmezei@mstdn.ca
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #16

                        @tiamat271 @steter @chris

                        In the "everyone is considered innocent until proven guilty,", if Senate fails to find the president guilty, shouldn't he be consiodered innocent and should not have rest of his life impaired by the "false" accusations ?

                        Outside of the MAGA cult, everyone knows Trump is guilty, but honouring rule of law means we have to honour the Senate's judgement judt as we have to respect that the American population democratically elected a mafia boss.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                        Svar
                        • Svar som emne
                        Login for at svare
                        • Ældste til nyeste
                        • Nyeste til ældste
                        • Most Votes


                        • Log ind

                        • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        Graciously hosted by data.coop
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Hjem
                        • Seneste
                        • Etiketter
                        • Populære
                        • Verden
                        • Bruger
                        • Grupper