Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Please don’t support the terrible Rowling

Please don’t support the terrible Rowling

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
70 Indlæg 33 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • stux@mstdn.socialS stux@mstdn.social

    Please don’t support the terrible Rowling

    flipper@mastodonapp.ukF This user is from outside of this forum
    flipper@mastodonapp.ukF This user is from outside of this forum
    flipper@mastodonapp.uk
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #57

    @stux Rowling has always been awful - the whole basis of the Harry Potter novels is that some people are fundamentally better than others. The much lauded themes of friendship are really just friendship with the right people - it's ok to remain enemies with the other.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ralfmaximus@mastodon.socialR ralfmaximus@mastodon.social

      @stux

      Streaming services now use paid services to track how often torrents are downloaded, effectively treating piracy as another viewer metric. Just by torrenting it you're helping boost JKR's numbers. And alas, using a VPN won't change that.

      There are many services, but one such tool is Piracymeter.
      https://piracymeter.com/

      stux@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      stux@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      stux@mstdn.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #58

      @ralfmaximus True that but it won't contribute direct cash at least 😉

      Gotta start somewhere

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • anthrazit@mastodon.socialA anthrazit@mastodon.social

        @raphaelmorgan @stux

        If I would solemnly swear to just have social contact with people I totally agree with I would be the loneliest person in the world.

        raphaelmorgan@disabled.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        raphaelmorgan@disabled.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        raphaelmorgan@disabled.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #59

        @anthrazit @stux so instead you choose to align yourself with fascists. Personally, I'd rather be lonely* than a fascist, but YMMV

        *I've actually discovered that trying to take away human rights from entire groups of people is a pretty easy line to draw and still find plenty of friends, especially when those groups are >half the planet. I associate with people who disagree with me on all sorts of things--whether certain people deserve the right to exist doesn't have to be on the list

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • noortjevee@mstdn.socialN noortjevee@mstdn.social

          @CStamp @jakebrake @stux one of my main gripes is

          "There is no magic strong enough to raise the dead...oh wait there is, we just lied. Lied so the only intresting (to me) part is negated and leads to dull by the books resolution.

          cstamp@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
          cstamp@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
          cstamp@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #60

          @Noortjevee That didn't bother me so much because the cost of coming back was one that cost a lot and corrupted the person throughout the process. And he didn't really come back from the dead because he never totally died. He was just mostly dead. 🙂 @jakebrake @stux

          noortjevee@mstdn.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cstamp@mastodon.socialC cstamp@mastodon.social

            @Noortjevee @jakebrake @stux I think he got his magic rules a lot more consistent. JKR had so many inconsistencies. They can do a reparo, for instance, to fix broken glasses, but poor witches/wizards have patched or ratty robes? They all seem to take the train, in a muggle train station, to Hogwarts, but there are magic folk who don't know what muggles dress like?

            noortjevee@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
            noortjevee@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
            noortjevee@mstdn.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #61

            @CStamp @jakebrake @stux

            the whole
            "...and either must die at the hand of the other for neither can live while the other survives."

            (had to google the words)

            Was kinda intresting to me.

            but the cop out of the deathly hallows, and then the goddamn expeliarmus deflect bullshit, so they could go "no no...HArry never killed him, voldemort kinda killed himself"

            G 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • cstamp@mastodon.socialC cstamp@mastodon.social

              @Noortjevee That didn't bother me so much because the cost of coming back was one that cost a lot and corrupted the person throughout the process. And he didn't really come back from the dead because he never totally died. He was just mostly dead. 🙂 @jakebrake @stux

              noortjevee@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
              noortjevee@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
              noortjevee@mstdn.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #62

              @CStamp i did not mean the Horcruxes. but the deathly hallows thing.

              cstamp@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • noortjevee@mstdn.socialN noortjevee@mstdn.social

                @CStamp @jakebrake @stux

                the whole
                "...and either must die at the hand of the other for neither can live while the other survives."

                (had to google the words)

                Was kinda intresting to me.

                but the cop out of the deathly hallows, and then the goddamn expeliarmus deflect bullshit, so they could go "no no...HArry never killed him, voldemort kinda killed himself"

                G This user is from outside of this forum
                G This user is from outside of this forum
                glitzersachen@hachyderm.io
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #63

                @Noortjevee @CStamp @jakebrake @stux

                They could just have said "predicting the future doesn't work, suck it up". Unfortunately fantasy on magic is rarely courageous enough to handle the "prophesy of the one who will be our salvation" properly (ie. this way).

                noortjevee@mstdn.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • G glitzersachen@hachyderm.io

                  @Noortjevee @CStamp @jakebrake @stux

                  They could just have said "predicting the future doesn't work, suck it up". Unfortunately fantasy on magic is rarely courageous enough to handle the "prophesy of the one who will be our salvation" properly (ie. this way).

                  noortjevee@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                  noortjevee@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                  noortjevee@mstdn.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #64

                  @glitzersachen @CStamp @jakebrake @stux

                  i am confused,

                  can you explain?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • stux@mstdn.socialS stux@mstdn.social

                    Please don’t support the terrible Rowling

                    hiphopheaven@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                    hiphopheaven@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                    hiphopheaven@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #65

                    @stux this is funny because nobody asked for a spider man remake either

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • stux@mstdn.socialS stux@mstdn.social

                      Please don’t support the terrible Rowling

                      ggmcbg@mstdn.plusG This user is from outside of this forum
                      ggmcbg@mstdn.plusG This user is from outside of this forum
                      ggmcbg@mstdn.plus
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #66

                      @stux

                      Does she plan to teach a new generation of kids that only a 'man' and a 'woman' can have a child that they recklessly leave-behind while fighting the specters of their own creation, to be raised by child-slavers and sneaky serpents, who are the only ones that child can trust? And that kid's name is definitely not Jesus?

                      I admit, I quit watching after the werewolf one and never read them. Did I get it wrong?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • stux@mstdn.socialS stux@mstdn.social

                        Please don’t support the terrible Rowling

                        dfx4509b@friendica.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
                        dfx4509b@friendica.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
                        dfx4509b@friendica.world
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #67
                        @stux 'Not a single soul,' except for shareholders maybe.
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • destranis@dragonscave.spaceD destranis@dragonscave.space

                          @stux Please don't spread nonsense. You are right about the fact that noone asked for this, but at least Rowling still knows what common sense is.

                          stephanie@ottawa.placeS This user is from outside of this forum
                          stephanie@ottawa.placeS This user is from outside of this forum
                          stephanie@ottawa.place
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #68

                          @destranis @stux Wow, you are an easy block. Bye bye transphobe

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • anthrazit@mastodon.socialA anthrazit@mastodon.social

                            @raphaelmorgan @stux

                            If I would solemnly swear to just have social contact with people I totally agree with I would be the loneliest person in the world.

                            stephanie@ottawa.placeS This user is from outside of this forum
                            stephanie@ottawa.placeS This user is from outside of this forum
                            stephanie@ottawa.place
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #69

                            @anthrazit This is not about agreeing if eggs are good or not. This is about agreeing if trans people have rights.

                            If you don't think they do, then no. I absolutely cannot "have social contact" with someone like you. @raphaelmorgan @stux

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • noortjevee@mstdn.socialN noortjevee@mstdn.social

                              @CStamp i did not mean the Horcruxes. but the deathly hallows thing.

                              cstamp@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                              cstamp@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                              cstamp@mastodon.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #70

                              @Noortjevee Ah...well, with that there were only 3, and a person would have to possess all 3.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                              Svar
                              • Svar som emne
                              Login for at svare
                              • Ældste til nyeste
                              • Nyeste til ældste
                              • Most Votes


                              • Log ind

                              • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                              • Login or register to search.
                              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                              Graciously hosted by data.coop
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Hjem
                              • Seneste
                              • Etiketter
                              • Populære
                              • Verden
                              • Bruger
                              • Grupper