"If you think you know how a toilet works when you actually don't, whatever—you still know enough to go #2 without embarrassing yourself.
-
RE: https://mstdn.science/@moritz_negwer/117109678119759211
"If you think you know how a toilet works when you actually don't, whatever—you still know enough to go #2 without embarrassing yourself. But if you think you know how science works when you actually don't, you're sunk—you literally can't do it if you think it's impossible." - Adam Mastroiani
Thank you for this brilliant article, @moritz_negwer 🧡
-
RE: https://mstdn.science/@moritz_negwer/117109678119759211
"If you think you know how a toilet works when you actually don't, whatever—you still know enough to go #2 without embarrassing yourself. But if you think you know how science works when you actually don't, you're sunk—you literally can't do it if you think it's impossible." - Adam Mastroiani
Thank you for this brilliant article, @moritz_negwer 🧡
@jwcph haha, nice that is resonated with you. This is one of the blogs that I keep recommending to other people, there are many useful concepts in there.
Another favourite post is this one, about how science (and especially science funding) is best understood as a strong-link problem, when we are currently regulating it as a weak-link problem.
https://www.experimental-history.com/p/repost-science-is-a-strong-link-problem -
@jwcph haha, nice that is resonated with you. This is one of the blogs that I keep recommending to other people, there are many useful concepts in there.
Another favourite post is this one, about how science (and especially science funding) is best understood as a strong-link problem, when we are currently regulating it as a weak-link problem.
https://www.experimental-history.com/p/repost-science-is-a-strong-link-problem@moritz_negwer Yeah, that's another banger - thanks again
