Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. I am sorry to say Graphene has fallen to the slop.

I am sorry to say Graphene has fallen to the slop.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
47 Indlæg 32 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

    I am sorry to say Graphene has fallen to the slop. thread: https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/117226938743085364

    they are making out that their vibe coding isn't *vibe* coding how dare you, which may be worse https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49591796

    sorro@woof.techS This user is from outside of this forum
    sorro@woof.techS This user is from outside of this forum
    sorro@woof.tech
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #22

    @davidgerard

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • zimzat@mastodon.socialZ zimzat@mastodon.social

      @davidgerard A cursory glance at their posts suggests they're stressing it isn't vibe *coding* if it's only "auditing" existing code?

      Which is a very fine line that still results in /using/ the slop machinery.

      I wish the software development ecosystem would fix the underlying architectural problems rather than keep brushing them under the rug. But we're now all so entrenched in arguing to slop or not to slop that few are talking about what it means not to slop.

      engideer@tech.lgbtE This user is from outside of this forum
      engideer@tech.lgbtE This user is from outside of this forum
      engideer@tech.lgbt
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #23

      @zimzat @davidgerard This post makes it sound like they're using it for code generation too; the same "oh but it's just a developer's private test branch" shtick as with the Bun Rust migration:

      https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/117227346006458958

      Plus, their AI-generated AGENTS.md explicitly talks of code generation, so yeah. I can imagine them perhaps being a tad more careful than many sloppers, but even then, AI use has this tendency to make the user less careful and less capable over time.

      zimzat@mastodon.socialZ 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • haverholm@radikal.socialH haverholm@radikal.social

        @piffio I'm not sure there is a list with both criteria, but I've seen a few #NoAI lists floating about.
        * https://noai.starlightnet.work/list.html
        * https://noailist.org/
        * https://codeberg.org/brib/slopfree-software-index

        ...of course I can't find the first one I thought of right now. Edit: found it! Added to top of list.

        @davidgerard

        piffio@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
        piffio@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
        piffio@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #24

        @haverholm @davidgerard

        Great resources, will check them all out!

        haverholm@radikal.socialH 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • zimzat@mastodon.socialZ zimzat@mastodon.social

          @davidgerard A cursory glance at their posts suggests they're stressing it isn't vibe *coding* if it's only "auditing" existing code?

          Which is a very fine line that still results in /using/ the slop machinery.

          I wish the software development ecosystem would fix the underlying architectural problems rather than keep brushing them under the rug. But we're now all so entrenched in arguing to slop or not to slop that few are talking about what it means not to slop.

          davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
          davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
          davidgerard@circumstances.run
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #25

          @zimzat also it never, ever stays true. It's another "i'm totally not vibe coding, I'm" [list of things anyone else would call abject vibe coding]

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • engideer@tech.lgbtE engideer@tech.lgbt

            @zimzat @davidgerard This post makes it sound like they're using it for code generation too; the same "oh but it's just a developer's private test branch" shtick as with the Bun Rust migration:

            https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/117227346006458958

            Plus, their AI-generated AGENTS.md explicitly talks of code generation, so yeah. I can imagine them perhaps being a tad more careful than many sloppers, but even then, AI use has this tendency to make the user less careful and less capable over time.

            zimzat@mastodon.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
            zimzat@mastodon.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
            zimzat@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #26

            @engideer @davidgerard Thanks, that specific message is a lot closer to an explanation of what's going on. It's the libertarian "personal responsibility" CYA.

            I agree with all the rest too, it's a slippery slope. I'm not ready to throw out the baby with the bathwater, but it's going suspiciously sideways fast.

            Honestly I've been suspicious of Graphene for a while because its proponents have a tendency to be shills. Top results for "Degoogle" on YouTube are often fear mongering.

            engideer@tech.lgbtE 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • zimzat@mastodon.socialZ zimzat@mastodon.social

              @engideer @davidgerard Thanks, that specific message is a lot closer to an explanation of what's going on. It's the libertarian "personal responsibility" CYA.

              I agree with all the rest too, it's a slippery slope. I'm not ready to throw out the baby with the bathwater, but it's going suspiciously sideways fast.

              Honestly I've been suspicious of Graphene for a while because its proponents have a tendency to be shills. Top results for "Degoogle" on YouTube are often fear mongering.

              engideer@tech.lgbtE This user is from outside of this forum
              engideer@tech.lgbtE This user is from outside of this forum
              engideer@tech.lgbt
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #27

              @zimzat Yep def same, wouldn't know of an alternative that checks all my use cases as of now, unfortunately. Same goes for the Linux kernel etc after all. But at least one can adjust their expectations accordingly knowing this

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                I am sorry to say Graphene has fallen to the slop. thread: https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/117226938743085364

                they are making out that their vibe coding isn't *vibe* coding how dare you, which may be worse https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49591796

                helpstertee@social.helpsterte.euH This user is from outside of this forum
                helpstertee@social.helpsterte.euH This user is from outside of this forum
                helpstertee@social.helpsterte.eu
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #28

                @davidgerard@circumstances.run oh nice they are not even arguing against the social and environmental problems and just talk about tool efficiency.

                guess as long as Soylent Green meets the nutritional macros…

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • shimst3r@famichiki.jpS shimst3r@famichiki.jp

                  @davidgerard "Many valid issues are reported in between the hallucinations and other nonsense. It takes additional time to confirm which issues are real and address it."

                  Well, how does it help then?

                  How does it help?

                  In an OS that people use because they fear for their lives.

                  How does it help?

                  I am beyond angry.

                  lettosprey@tech.lgbtL This user is from outside of this forum
                  lettosprey@tech.lgbtL This user is from outside of this forum
                  lettosprey@tech.lgbt
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #29

                  @shimst3r We have AI tools at work doing these kinda "review tasks" automagically, and report potential issues.

                  My experience with them is that they do work, they highlight things that is wrong and should fix, things that can be a potential security issue, etc. But so far, I have yet to see it highlight something that a non-AI static analysis tool would find with a fraction of the resources.

                  It can bug about things that isn't an issue, this is something that the "old" tool does as well. So, all in all, higher resource use for about the same output.

                  What can LLM tools do that the old tools could not? Of course, they can suggest a fix.

                  That part is the dangerous one. Using LLM to detect potential issues should not come at a high risk, though the benefit compared to existing tools now seems low. This might improve over time, I dunno...

                  Using them to suggest patches has a high risk of patches being applied without enough critical evaluation. Not ok.

                  @davidgerard

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • dysfun@social.treehouse.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dysfun@social.treehouse.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dysfun@social.treehouse.systems
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #30

                    @FediThing @contrasocial @davidgerard yes but have you considered the new models change everything? 😂

                    davidgerard@circumstances.runD 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • piffio@mastodon.socialP piffio@mastodon.social

                      @haverholm @davidgerard

                      Great resources, will check them all out!

                      haverholm@radikal.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                      haverholm@radikal.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                      haverholm@radikal.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #31

                      @piffio Happy to share! 🤝 @davidgerard

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • dysfun@social.treehouse.systemsD dysfun@social.treehouse.systems

                        @FediThing @contrasocial @davidgerard yes but have you considered the new models change everything? 😂

                        davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                        davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                        davidgerard@circumstances.run
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #32

                        @dysfun @FediThing @contrasocial literally their excuse is, we have to use the chatbot or we'll be left behind

                        pndc@social.treehouse.systemsP 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • shimst3r@famichiki.jpS shimst3r@famichiki.jp

                          @davidgerard "Many valid issues are reported in between the hallucinations and other nonsense. It takes additional time to confirm which issues are real and address it."

                          Well, how does it help then?

                          How does it help?

                          In an OS that people use because they fear for their lives.

                          How does it help?

                          I am beyond angry.

                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                          slotos@toot.community
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #33

                          @shimst3r @davidgerard

                          There are two possibilities with AI: either it’s a shitty coder or a really good one. The latter is way more terrifying, when you consider the small circle that controls it.

                          Funny how people that should’ve known why that is the case turn out to have been running a theater all along.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                            I am sorry to say Graphene has fallen to the slop. thread: https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/117226938743085364

                            they are making out that their vibe coding isn't *vibe* coding how dare you, which may be worse https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49591796

                            elexia@catcatnya.comE This user is from outside of this forum
                            elexia@catcatnya.comE This user is from outside of this forum
                            elexia@catcatnya.com
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #34

                            @davidgerard really wish I wasn't reliant on having a smartphone, it's all so grim

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                              @dysfun @FediThing @contrasocial literally their excuse is, we have to use the chatbot or we'll be left behind

                              pndc@social.treehouse.systemsP This user is from outside of this forum
                              pndc@social.treehouse.systemsP This user is from outside of this forum
                              pndc@social.treehouse.systems
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #35

                              @davidgerard @dysfun @FediThing @contrasocial Why should GrapheneOS even care that they're being "left behind"? "Left behind" by whom? Is the point of the project merely to one-up similar projects on features at any cost, including at the expense of quality and security? That's not a great proposition for its users, who should perhaps instead start looking at the competition to see what GrapheneOS is so desperate to catch up with.

                              rogerbw@discordian.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                                I am sorry to say Graphene has fallen to the slop. thread: https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/117226938743085364

                                they are making out that their vibe coding isn't *vibe* coding how dare you, which may be worse https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49591796

                                frutiger@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                frutiger@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                frutiger@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #36

                                @davidgerard If ycombinator is the source on grapheneos issues, then it's not true. Some of you sound like religious nutjobs when talking about ai with words like 'tainted', a horseshoe version of twitter users who are psychotically pro ai.

                                Edit: you blocked me, but this was my first fedi account, so yes it's masto.social. Is that the best you've got, mister terminally online who replies in 30 seconds?

                                davidgerard@circumstances.runD 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • pndc@social.treehouse.systemsP pndc@social.treehouse.systems

                                  @davidgerard @dysfun @FediThing @contrasocial Why should GrapheneOS even care that they're being "left behind"? "Left behind" by whom? Is the point of the project merely to one-up similar projects on features at any cost, including at the expense of quality and security? That's not a great proposition for its users, who should perhaps instead start looking at the competition to see what GrapheneOS is so desperate to catch up with.

                                  rogerbw@discordian.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  rogerbw@discordian.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  rogerbw@discordian.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #37

                                  @pndc @davidgerard @dysfun @FediThing @contrasocial They want some of that sweet VC money (that has already been thrown away elsewhere)?

                                  davidgerard@circumstances.runD 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • frutiger@mastodon.socialF frutiger@mastodon.social

                                    @davidgerard If ycombinator is the source on grapheneos issues, then it's not true. Some of you sound like religious nutjobs when talking about ai with words like 'tainted', a horseshoe version of twitter users who are psychotically pro ai.

                                    Edit: you blocked me, but this was my first fedi account, so yes it's masto.social. Is that the best you've got, mister terminally online who replies in 30 seconds?

                                    davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    davidgerard@circumstances.run
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #38

                                    @frutiger@mastodon.social mastodon.social, 14 followers, thanks slopbot

                                    the source is reading their fucking AGENTS.md you dipshit

                                    dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • rogerbw@discordian.socialR rogerbw@discordian.social

                                      @pndc @davidgerard @dysfun @FediThing @contrasocial They want some of that sweet VC money (that has already been thrown away elsewhere)?

                                      davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      davidgerard@circumstances.run
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #39

                                      @RogerBW @pndc @dysfun @FediThing @contrasocial yeah @zzt points out the fucking weird Motorola deal as the obvious proximate cause

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                                        I am sorry to say Graphene has fallen to the slop. thread: https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/117226938743085364

                                        they are making out that their vibe coding isn't *vibe* coding how dare you, which may be worse https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49591796

                                        iain@kolektiva.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                        iain@kolektiva.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                        iain@kolektiva.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #40

                                        @davidgerard “The output is filled with hallucinations and incorrect details but an experienced developer can sift through it, identify the real issues it uncovered and get those fixed.”

                                        Because every developers favorite part of using code analysis tools has always been sifting through all the false positives.

                                        davidgerard@circumstances.runD barubary@infosec.exchangeB mahryekuh@hachyderm.ioM toxy@mastodon.acc.sunet.seT 4 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • iain@kolektiva.socialI iain@kolektiva.social

                                          @davidgerard “The output is filled with hallucinations and incorrect details but an experienced developer can sift through it, identify the real issues it uncovered and get those fixed.”

                                          Because every developers favorite part of using code analysis tools has always been sifting through all the false positives.

                                          davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          davidgerard@circumstances.run
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #41

                                          @iain yeah that bit was very obviously someone pasting in a marketing excuse

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper