When illustrating the Fediverse as a network, what should the nodes be?
-
I didn't answer this one. I usually do people as nodes, with some kind of boundary to indicate instances. Thanks all!
-
I didn't answer this one. I usually do people as nodes, with some kind of boundary to indicate instances. Thanks all!
@evan I'm with you on this one.
-
I didn't answer this one. I usually do people as nodes, with some kind of boundary to indicate instances. Thanks all!
I get the good intentions of the encyclopedia diagrams showing the different software packages, but I do not think it works at all.
-
@evan
What instance/server/software someone might be using is irrelevant, we all follow *people*.@alisonw correct
-
@evan I think Topics could just as well have the same rational, and it's interesting to me that it has scored so low so far.
@aeva at some point I want to use the tags.pub data to make a network diagram where nodes are hashtags and connections exist if they occur in the same content; connection strength is number of items they've been in together.
-
@manlycoffee nice
-
I didn't answer this one. I usually do people as nodes, with some kind of boundary to indicate instances. Thanks all!
@evan this is a good one!
-
-
I didn't answer this one. I usually do people as nodes, with some kind of boundary to indicate instances. Thanks all!
@evan Nodes should always be the entities signing posts IMO. If users cannot sign posts with their own keys, then you're not actually following that person and the person is not their own node. You're following a URL/ID on the actual node, which you trust to not lie to you about which person they're posting content for.
Hopefully, this will improve eventually, so that people have full sovereignty, also for moving between instances. Should be like changing your postal address, not your passport.
-
I didn't answer this one. I usually do people as nodes, with some kind of boundary to indicate instances. Thanks all!
@evan One of the nodes could be a group and another one a bot to illustrate the possible variations. Otherwise I like this illustration much better than the more common impersonal ones.
