For Instagram, my art is "Likely made with AI".

[nyancient@social.treehouse.systems]

@davidrevoy you're in good company, Jane Austen also got flagged as "definitely AI". ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[doomsdayscw@kolektiva.social]

@davidrevoy Wow! #AISucks!

[f0bb1d04@mastodon.social]

@davidrevoy as another artist i know how hard it hits you just the other day some artist friend got questioned whether they used ai to draw their new art, cuz the questioner didn't understand the structure of their creative outfit, they were sad and upset just like you..

[supportgrapheneos_667@social.tchncs.de]

@davidrevoy

One more reason to #unplugbigtech

[nlupo@amikejo.xyz]

@davidrevoy It seems they have a case of avian intelligence.

[nicelymanifest@mastodon.social]

@davidrevoy I think a greater focus away from online to real world canvases etc would be prudent.

[litt17@mastodon.social]

@davidrevoy maybe this AI era is to tell us to not rely on technology too much

[omar@mastodon.bsd.cafe]

@davidrevoy

Les tocards qui disent ça ne sont de toute façon pas ton public, envoi les chier.
Puis t'as une réputation, donc ne t'en fait pas trop.

Quant aux artistes qui veulent se lancer et qui ne font que du numérique par contre, oui, ça va être compliquer.

[jdgeoshack@social.vivaldi.net]

@davidrevoy Time to ditch the metaverse?

[yon@sakurajima.moe]

@davidrevoy Only way to get rid of AI is to take the money out of it. Meta is making money on this and if they haven’t already started I bet they will start making their own AI accounts.

(Which is why I think free open source AI would grind the AI companies to a halt, because there would be no money in it and then it could be made ethical for whoever insists.)

[irina@wandering.shop]

@pafurijaz @davidrevoy I'd say do both. Unless you rely on Instagram for a sizeable part of your income.

[ladyteruki@mastodon.social]

@davidrevoy : the problem is that now you can find genAI that creates timelapses. I don't use them so I have no idea how good they currently are, but even if they're bad they still are enough to discredit timelapses entirely. Soon there will be no way to actually prove your creation is manmade and it's TERRIFYING.

[ralfmaximus@mastodon.social]

@me @davidrevoy

Many are outright scams designed to trick people into front loading new training data.

[serebit@floss.social]

@yon @davidrevoy They're actually hemorrhaging money on this, but they're trying really hard to convince investors that it isn't just a huge money pit. See: https://isaiprofitable.com

[cataclock@wetdry.world]

@davidrevoy either this is a feature with a bad detector, or something to try to promote AI.

[moepmoep@social.tchncs.de]

@davidrevoy i looooooooove timelapses.
Also i looove artist showing or telling about the effort that goes into their art.
It helps me not feel toooo bad for the sometimes I pick up a pencil and try to free something from my mind.

[bearavikas@mastodon.social]

@davidrevoy Obnoxious doesn't even cover that. I hope for a day when Meta and their ilk is just a blurb on a Wikipedia page.

[moira@mastodon.murkworks.net]

@davidrevoy Yeah. I've been getting that with my writing. It's hard to describe how infuriating it is to have your work stolen, badly copied by a fucking machine, and then to be accused of being that same fucking machine.

hate it so much

[fishidwardrobe@social.tchncs.de]

@davidrevoy i suspect it's because a lot of "Al" art looks like your art…

[raccoon@hollow.raccoon.quest]

@davidrevoy@framapiaf.org
Deadass infuriating that one of the most charming artists I know is accused by AI to post AI generated images.