🚨 They are bringing back #ChatControl 🚨

[tutanota@mastodon.social]

They are bringing back #ChatControl

Metsola doesn't understand that no means no.

Discussion is scheduled for Monday, so act now: https://fightchatcontrol.eu/

#No2Surveillance #Privacy #Security

[projectmoon@social.agnos.is]

@Tutanota@mastodon.social I don't really understand how it can just keep coming up again and again and again and again. This kind of stuff should be illegal. If a bill/amendment/whatever is rejected, at bare minimum it should be off the table until a new parliament is formed. Not just lol 6 months later kind of thing.

[phl@mastodon.social]

@projectmoon @Tutanota "How about chat control?"
"No."
"How about chat control?"
"No."
"How about chat control?"
"No."
"How about chat control?"
"No."
"How about chat control?"
"No."

[skyblitz@kanoa.de]

@projectmoon @Tutanota because a big company of mass scanning have brib.... lobyed via fake "protect the children" non profit, to make this happen.

So all the politics you see push as hard as possible are brib.... lobyed.

[dukeboitans@mas.to]

@Tutanota They can't be bargained with. They can't be reasoned with. They don't feel pity, or remorse, or fear! And they absolutely will not stop, ever, until you accept mass surveillance!

[argyle13@xarxa.cloud]

@Tutanota I am sick of this people. No is no!!!!

[dzwiedziu@mastodon.social]

@Tutanota
#Metsola has the mentality of a person around whom you cover your drink.

#ChatControl

@elena

[poddus@mastodon.social]

@Tutanota in Germany the support seems to be purely cdu csu and spd, the current ruling and historically strong establishment political parties. I like them not 🫩

[mrchimp@cupoftea.social]

@phl @projectmoon @Tutanota it's modern tech, so there isn't a "no" option, just "maybe later".

[skywards@mastodon.social]

@Tutanota It's so dissappointing seeing the EU go down this path.

[skywards@mastodon.social]

@phl @projectmoon @Tutanota "How about chat control?"
"No"
"How about chat control?"
"No"
"So it's a yes?"

[digol@mastodon.social]

@poddus @Tutanota the SPD is kinda divided, remember that Birgit Sippel criticized the redoing of the vote on March 26th and voted in favour of both amendment 34 and 35

[niknabno@mastodon.social]

@Tutanota Any law that doesn't originate from public demand is 9 times out of 10 an evil law.
Also 23 Vs. 4 is shocking.

[walrus@toot.wales]

@dzwiedziu

Have I got this right?

You are saying ""The EU (still) wants to..." when in fact the EU doesn't want to, but some small faction is trying to get them to implement it?

[dzwiedziu@mastodon.social]

@Walrus
I'm only retooting this message (see the toot I've replied to), alas yes.

[walrus@toot.wales]

@dzwiedziu

Sorry, should have replied to the OP, not you! Not enough coffee yet!

It's misrepresentation, then. Or scare-mongering.

[dzwiedziu@mastodon.social]

@Walrus
No problem!

Can you elaborate on the latter?

[walrus@toot.wales]

@dzwiedziu

I agree with their campaign against chat control. But saying the EU wants it, when it's just some pressure group (or whatever they are) trying to force it through, is not right.

[dzwiedziu@mastodon.social]

@Walrus
This is a bit understandable interpretation, if the EU president wants to force CC and 23 of 27 member states want it.

But I agree that's a generalisation and that's bad, as you say.