Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Can anyone give me a quick judgement on how reliable this organizing platform is in terms of security, software autonomy and openness?

Can anyone give me a quick judgement on how reliable this organizing platform is in terms of security, software autonomy and openness?

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
solidaritytechinfoseclabororganizing
16 Indlæg 5 Posters 31 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • jowek@autonomous.zoneJ jowek@autonomous.zone

    @malte Yiaks!

    Not good. The data-brooker system is on of the biggest data sources to destroy privacy and enable surveillance capitalism and government mass surveillance.

    malte@radikal.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    malte@radikal.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    malte@radikal.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #4

    @jowek That's a dealbreaker, thanks for finding that.

    jowek@autonomous.zoneJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • malte@radikal.socialM malte@radikal.social

      @jowek That's a dealbreaker, thanks for finding that.

      jowek@autonomous.zoneJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jowek@autonomous.zoneJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jowek@autonomous.zone
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #5

      @malte
      There are other red flags in the terms, and not the comrade kind. https://www.solidarity.tech/terms
      And then its closed source. The polished aesthetic gives a vibe coding vibe too. But thats pure speculation from my side.

      In general i makes me wonder if there ever be good tech under us law again... Maybe its just a long time since i read the terms of closed source projects.

      Zetkin is open source, run by a foundation. I like the explicit values mentioned: https://zetkin.org/en/foundation

      malte@radikal.socialM benjaoming@social.data.coopB liaizon@social.wake.stL 3 Replies Last reply
      0
      • jowek@autonomous.zoneJ jowek@autonomous.zone

        @malte
        There are other red flags in the terms, and not the comrade kind. https://www.solidarity.tech/terms
        And then its closed source. The polished aesthetic gives a vibe coding vibe too. But thats pure speculation from my side.

        In general i makes me wonder if there ever be good tech under us law again... Maybe its just a long time since i read the terms of closed source projects.

        Zetkin is open source, run by a foundation. I like the explicit values mentioned: https://zetkin.org/en/foundation

        malte@radikal.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        malte@radikal.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        malte@radikal.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #6

        @jowek What are the other red flags? (I know about Zetkin by the way)

        jowek@autonomous.zoneJ 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • malte@radikal.socialM malte@radikal.social

          @jowek What are the other red flags? (I know about Zetkin by the way)

          jowek@autonomous.zoneJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jowek@autonomous.zoneJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jowek@autonomous.zone
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #7

          @malte Servers are in the US. And i can't see how i can be GDPR compliant in EU. So could be future major problems, after years of onboarding.
          Same with the whole potential "deauthorization of the service", could end up in a loss of data, like the recent microsoft one-cloud situation for non-profits.
          And then explicit restriction of use for any 'unlawful activity' and 'damage or falsify Company rating' is also a bit shady.

          And Solidarity Software Inc. is just dirty in itself too 🙂

          malte@radikal.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jowek@autonomous.zoneJ jowek@autonomous.zone

            @malte Servers are in the US. And i can't see how i can be GDPR compliant in EU. So could be future major problems, after years of onboarding.
            Same with the whole potential "deauthorization of the service", could end up in a loss of data, like the recent microsoft one-cloud situation for non-profits.
            And then explicit restriction of use for any 'unlawful activity' and 'damage or falsify Company rating' is also a bit shady.

            And Solidarity Software Inc. is just dirty in itself too 🙂

            malte@radikal.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
            malte@radikal.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
            malte@radikal.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #8

            @jowek Great summary, thanks. I think this is more than enough facts.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jowek@autonomous.zoneJ jowek@autonomous.zone

              @malte
              There are other red flags in the terms, and not the comrade kind. https://www.solidarity.tech/terms
              And then its closed source. The polished aesthetic gives a vibe coding vibe too. But thats pure speculation from my side.

              In general i makes me wonder if there ever be good tech under us law again... Maybe its just a long time since i read the terms of closed source projects.

              Zetkin is open source, run by a foundation. I like the explicit values mentioned: https://zetkin.org/en/foundation

              benjaoming@social.data.coopB This user is from outside of this forum
              benjaoming@social.data.coopB This user is from outside of this forum
              benjaoming@social.data.coop
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #9

              @jowek @malte I don't see any transformative power in solidarity.tech, and I agree that it's giving strong vibe code vibes.

              malte@radikal.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jowek@autonomous.zoneJ jowek@autonomous.zone

                @malte
                There are other red flags in the terms, and not the comrade kind. https://www.solidarity.tech/terms
                And then its closed source. The polished aesthetic gives a vibe coding vibe too. But thats pure speculation from my side.

                In general i makes me wonder if there ever be good tech under us law again... Maybe its just a long time since i read the terms of closed source projects.

                Zetkin is open source, run by a foundation. I like the explicit values mentioned: https://zetkin.org/en/foundation

                liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                liaizon@social.wake.st
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #10

                @jowek @malte "None of our AI providers (Anthropic, OpenAI, Deepgram, Google Cloud Translate) use your data to train their models" lol these people are clowns.

                malte@radikal.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • benjaoming@social.data.coopB benjaoming@social.data.coop

                  @jowek @malte I don't see any transformative power in solidarity.tech, and I agree that it's giving strong vibe code vibes.

                  malte@radikal.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  malte@radikal.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  malte@radikal.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #11

                  @benjaoming What specifically are you picking up on when you say vibe code vibes? I'm curious what those of you with software development experience see @jowek

                  reynir@social.data.coopR 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

                    @jowek @malte "None of our AI providers (Anthropic, OpenAI, Deepgram, Google Cloud Translate) use your data to train their models" lol these people are clowns.

                    malte@radikal.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                    malte@radikal.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                    malte@radikal.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #12

                    @liaizon Guessing you mean they can't really guarantee that? I agree, that sounds pretty unlikely that they're not using the data! @jowek

                    liaizon@social.wake.stL 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • malte@radikal.socialM malte@radikal.social

                      @benjaoming What specifically are you picking up on when you say vibe code vibes? I'm curious what those of you with software development experience see @jowek

                      reynir@social.data.coopR This user is from outside of this forum
                      reynir@social.data.coopR This user is from outside of this forum
                      reynir@social.data.coop
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #13

                      @malte @benjaoming @jowek what stands out to me are these two pictures. Like, what are you even trying to communicate with these? Also, the very American smiles on peoples' faces (but ok I guess it is an American product after all).

                      That's just the marketing. I don't know about their product.

                      benjaoming@social.data.coopB 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • reynir@social.data.coopR reynir@social.data.coop

                        @malte @benjaoming @jowek what stands out to me are these two pictures. Like, what are you even trying to communicate with these? Also, the very American smiles on peoples' faces (but ok I guess it is an American product after all).

                        That's just the marketing. I don't know about their product.

                        benjaoming@social.data.coopB This user is from outside of this forum
                        benjaoming@social.data.coopB This user is from outside of this forum
                        benjaoming@social.data.coop
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #14

                        @reynir @malte @jowek only basing judgment from aesthetics - nothing technical.

                        I agree with Reynir that the graphics and the "quantity over quality" style of communication is what constitutes the main parts of the vibe.

                        malte@radikal.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • malte@radikal.socialM malte@radikal.social

                          @liaizon Guessing you mean they can't really guarantee that? I agree, that sounds pretty unlikely that they're not using the data! @jowek

                          liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                          liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                          liaizon@social.wake.st
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #15

                          @malte @jowek yeah I just can't picture why they wouldn't there's literally nothing stopping them. Google is already publicly saying they are using everyone's personal email accounts for training data why should they differentiate anything else if the regulation that does exist doesn't actually manage to effect them from anything else they do to scrounge sources of data

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • benjaoming@social.data.coopB benjaoming@social.data.coop

                            @reynir @malte @jowek only basing judgment from aesthetics - nothing technical.

                            I agree with Reynir that the graphics and the "quantity over quality" style of communication is what constitutes the main parts of the vibe.

                            malte@radikal.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                            malte@radikal.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                            malte@radikal.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #16

                            @benjaoming Good rule of thumb to be on the lookout for - the quantity over quality alert ! @reynir @jowek

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Svar
                            • Svar som emne
                            Login for at svare
                            • Ældste til nyeste
                            • Nyeste til ældste
                            • Most Votes


                            • Log ind

                            • Login or register to search.
                            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                            Graciously hosted by data.coop
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Hjem
                            • Seneste
                            • Etiketter
                            • Populære
                            • Verden
                            • Bruger
                            • Grupper