Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. They pay $34 for burgers.

They pay $34 for burgers.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
167 Indlæg 112 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • camille@social.praxis.nycC camille@social.praxis.nyc

    @futurebird
    Medicare for ALL
    Housing for ALL
    Healthcare for ALL
    Education for ALL
    Food for ALL
    Pricey Burgers (from time to time) for ALL

    Progressive taxation and regulations that ensure good living wages are the right ways to deal with income inequality NOT withholding services from people because they are "too rich" to get them.

    @mekkaokereke

    bartok@kolektiva.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
    bartok@kolektiva.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
    bartok@kolektiva.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #158

    @camille @futurebird @mekkaokereke I worked with a corporate attorney who was losing her eyesight, and she was awarded SSDI at the hearing stage. Between her and her husband, I reckon their wealth was around $10 million. Family of four.

    Clearly, she didn't need SSDI.

    Yes, ensure the health and well being (housing, school, wages, etc.) for all, w/o means testing.

    But the point is that while I do not favor means testing, the wealthy should not available themselves of these public goods.

    Because they do not need them.

    This is economic efficiency on the one hand, and compassion on the other.

    camille@social.praxis.nycC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

      @mekkaokereke

      Now why exactly is a $34 burger incompatible with having excellent public services your pay for with taxes?

      Schools aren't charity operations, this isn't a band-aid for the desperate. It's something people should look from other cities at and say "I wish my city had that"

      Drop of your kids and trust they are safe AND learning while you are at work. Pick them up and have a $34 burger AND avocado toast. Let's live well together.

      This must scare them to death.

      J This user is from outside of this forum
      J This user is from outside of this forum
      jameswidman@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #159

      @futurebird @mekkaokereke well, yeah; if the servant class isn't constantly under the kind of pressure that makes them submit to the authority of extreme wealth, then, from the perspective of the ruling class, extreme wealth loses some of its value (even if their purchasing power goes up).

      (fwiw, a quick googling of "${nyt_board_member} net worth" suggests they're not billionaires, but like 8 to 9 figures, so still pretty comfortable. it seems as if it's just a rag by the rich, for the rich.)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • silver_huskey@fandom.inkS silver_huskey@fandom.ink

        @mekkaokereke I love how we in this country love minding everyone's business but our own. Fuck means testing.

        klausfiend@mstdn.caK This user is from outside of this forum
        klausfiend@mstdn.caK This user is from outside of this forum
        klausfiend@mstdn.ca
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #160

        @silver_huskey @mekkaokereke I think that's what you get when the founding culture was that of fun-hating Puritans.

        silver_huskey@fandom.inkS 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • klausfiend@mstdn.caK klausfiend@mstdn.ca

          @silver_huskey @mekkaokereke I think that's what you get when the founding culture was that of fun-hating Puritans.

          silver_huskey@fandom.inkS This user is from outside of this forum
          silver_huskey@fandom.inkS This user is from outside of this forum
          silver_huskey@fandom.ink
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #161

          @klausfiend @mekkaokereke Absolutely! We've been this way for literally centuries. Pulling people out of that thinking has been a constant tug of war.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

            @mekkaokereke one of the core lessons of public health is that bureaucracy is _expensive_. The entire “Who should pay what!?” Exercise slows the systems down and costs a ton of money and basically all it produces is spreadsheets that cruel selfish people use to be cruel and selfish, and that crowd can’t wrap their heads around the fact that the other thing that’s great about public services being public services is that it’s cheaper.

            lori@cambrian.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
            lori@cambrian.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
            lori@cambrian.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #162
            @mhoye @mekkaokereke The efficiency experts can't conceive of themselves as a cost center.
            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • screwturn@mastodon.socialS screwturn@mastodon.social

              @realtegan

              Trying to carve out a "special" class who are entitled to school lunch has always been a foolish approach that just adds layers of expensive policing that INEVITABLY wind up costing more than they save, and preventing some number of eligible students from getting serviced.

              Unfortunately, some people are always more focused on the remote or insignificant risk of cheaters, than they are on make sure that they are servicing those who need it

              Just make it free to all

              @mekkaokereke

              mauvedeity@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
              mauvedeity@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
              mauvedeity@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #163

              @screwturn this.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • mekkaokereke@hachyderm.ioM mekkaokereke@hachyderm.io

                They pay $34 for burgers. Should their fire department service be free? Opening a new fire department in one of NYC's richest neighborhoods has some of America's pettiest journalists asking silly questions in headlines again.🤡

                The article acknowledges the fire department analogy, then blows past it.🤷🏿‍♂️

                The solve for "Sometimes when a service like free childcare is available to all, marginalized communities get squeezed out," is "Address that racism."

                It's not "Therefore waste incredible amounts of time and money trying to means test something that society should just make available to all.🤡"

                aud@fire.asta.lgbtA This user is from outside of this forum
                aud@fire.asta.lgbtA This user is from outside of this forum
                aud@fire.asta.lgbt
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #164

                @mekkaokereke@hachyderm.io I mean, what do they think Mamdani should build there? A Turkish embassy?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • mekkaokereke@hachyderm.ioM mekkaokereke@hachyderm.io

                  They pay $34 for burgers. Should their fire department service be free? Opening a new fire department in one of NYC's richest neighborhoods has some of America's pettiest journalists asking silly questions in headlines again.🤡

                  The article acknowledges the fire department analogy, then blows past it.🤷🏿‍♂️

                  The solve for "Sometimes when a service like free childcare is available to all, marginalized communities get squeezed out," is "Address that racism."

                  It's not "Therefore waste incredible amounts of time and money trying to means test something that society should just make available to all.🤡"

                  reed@social.lolR This user is from outside of this forum
                  reed@social.lolR This user is from outside of this forum
                  reed@social.lol
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #165

                  @mekkaokereke that type of framing assumes that rich families must be happy and healthy. My parents struggled but made just enough money, yet I went without food so much because of their abusive behavior. How many kids could be helped when _everyone_ gets child care and lunch?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • bartok@kolektiva.socialB bartok@kolektiva.social

                    @camille @futurebird @mekkaokereke I worked with a corporate attorney who was losing her eyesight, and she was awarded SSDI at the hearing stage. Between her and her husband, I reckon their wealth was around $10 million. Family of four.

                    Clearly, she didn't need SSDI.

                    Yes, ensure the health and well being (housing, school, wages, etc.) for all, w/o means testing.

                    But the point is that while I do not favor means testing, the wealthy should not available themselves of these public goods.

                    Because they do not need them.

                    This is economic efficiency on the one hand, and compassion on the other.

                    camille@social.praxis.nycC This user is from outside of this forum
                    camille@social.praxis.nycC This user is from outside of this forum
                    camille@social.praxis.nyc
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #166

                    @Bartok
                    I say tax them higher or means test/sliding scale. I am NOT in favor of shutting anyone out NOR am I in favor of just not having it for fear a rich person gets access. If everyone gets it, everyone gets it. I don't care what rich people have if ny needs are more than covered.

                    Also that person paid their SSDI contributions. Fair is fair. I like fairness.
                    @futurebird @mekkaokereke

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • reed@social.lolR This user is from outside of this forum
                      reed@social.lolR This user is from outside of this forum
                      reed@social.lol
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #167

                      @heathen_cat @mekkaokereke exactly! My mom had me on my first diet at age 10. And it took me a looooong time as an adult to learn I actually do like grapefruit.

                      In high school, a family friend (I called her "aunt" but we weren't related) worked in the cafeteria, and she would often sneak me soup or a sandwich. It was sometimes the only time I ate in the day.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                      Svar
                      • Svar som emne
                      Login for at svare
                      • Ældste til nyeste
                      • Nyeste til ældste
                      • Most Votes


                      • Log ind

                      • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      Graciously hosted by data.coop
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Hjem
                      • Seneste
                      • Etiketter
                      • Populære
                      • Verden
                      • Bruger
                      • Grupper