I struggle to understand why the EU commission is recommending people to use X. How else should the fact that the X logo is plastered all over their (our) web site be interpreted.
-
I struggle to understand why the EU commission is recommending people to use X. How else should the fact that the X logo is plastered all over their (our) web site be interpreted. It's a deeply irresponsible and harmful use of their power of influence.
After all that's happened and after all the pleading and campaigning by citizens. This is the kind of thing that truly makes you lose faith.
I can't even bring myself to tag them in this post. There's no point anyway.
-
I struggle to understand why the EU commission is recommending people to use X. How else should the fact that the X logo is plastered all over their (our) web site be interpreted. It's a deeply irresponsible and harmful use of their power of influence.
After all that's happened and after all the pleading and campaigning by citizens. This is the kind of thing that truly makes you lose faith.
I can't even bring myself to tag them in this post. There's no point anyway.
@leanderlindahl Because politics move glacially slow and are sometimes unreasonably careful... Maybe you also wrote to MEPs and asked them them to leave using @leavex ? The answers I received vary wildly in vision and tech literacy.
-
I struggle to understand why the EU commission is recommending people to use X. How else should the fact that the X logo is plastered all over their (our) web site be interpreted. It's a deeply irresponsible and harmful use of their power of influence.
After all that's happened and after all the pleading and campaigning by citizens. This is the kind of thing that truly makes you lose faith.
I can't even bring myself to tag them in this post. There's no point anyway.
@leanderlindahl It's early and I've had no coffee yet, but, why does the headline say "nearly half" of Europeans support banning X... but further down it's actually more like 70%?
-
@leanderlindahl Because politics move glacially slow and are sometimes unreasonably careful... Maybe you also wrote to MEPs and asked them them to leave using @leavex ? The answers I received vary wildly in vision and tech literacy.
@rraggl @leanderlindahl @leavex Maybe we should begin with a small, positive and eye opening proposal. French association RAP developed 3 simple laws to 'infiltrate' in commercial social media:
1) Ok, use them, but stop promoting. (That is: remove their logos/buttons from your web and other communications).
2) Don't create content exclusively for them. Your content's main reference must be under your control.
3) Don't pay to publish. No paid accounts, no paid campaigns.
-
@rraggl @leanderlindahl @leavex Maybe we should begin with a small, positive and eye opening proposal. French association RAP developed 3 simple laws to 'infiltrate' in commercial social media:
1) Ok, use them, but stop promoting. (That is: remove their logos/buttons from your web and other communications).
2) Don't create content exclusively for them. Your content's main reference must be under your control.
3) Don't pay to publish. No paid accounts, no paid campaigns.
@rraggl @leanderlindahl @leavex In my experience they work quite well. They are easy to understand and to follow, and in the process they work as a Trojan that gives way to a wider conversation on the way we consume social media...
https://antipub.org/resistance-a-l-agression-publicitaire-s-infiltre-dans-les-reseaux-sociaux/
-
I struggle to understand why the EU commission is recommending people to use X. How else should the fact that the X logo is plastered all over their (our) web site be interpreted. It's a deeply irresponsible and harmful use of their power of influence.
After all that's happened and after all the pleading and campaigning by citizens. This is the kind of thing that truly makes you lose faith.
I can't even bring myself to tag them in this post. There's no point anyway.
Next they'll be advertising pornhub – because it has many users, they need to be where the users are...
Then cigarettes and crack cocaine – because why not, might as well...
What is leadership? I ask myself more and more often. Because clearly it's sorely missing in our age.
-
Next they'll be advertising pornhub – because it has many users, they need to be where the users are...
Then cigarettes and crack cocaine – because why not, might as well...
What is leadership? I ask myself more and more often. Because clearly it's sorely missing in our age.
Sometimes things are fuzzy and unclear, there are arguments on the one hand and also on the other hand.
This is not such an issue. It's crystal clear.
-
@leanderlindahl Because politics move glacially slow and are sometimes unreasonably careful... Maybe you also wrote to MEPs and asked them them to leave using @leavex ? The answers I received vary wildly in vision and tech literacy.
@rraggl @leanderlindahl @leavex
... or unreasonably careless, sometimes (in this case)!
-
I struggle to understand why the EU commission is recommending people to use X. How else should the fact that the X logo is plastered all over their (our) web site be interpreted. It's a deeply irresponsible and harmful use of their power of influence.
After all that's happened and after all the pleading and campaigning by citizens. This is the kind of thing that truly makes you lose faith.
I can't even bring myself to tag them in this post. There's no point anyway.
@leanderlindahl Organistional inertia. Xitter used to not be a Nazi bar.
EU organisations often move slower than most, with the notable exceptions of the glacial ones of the Catholic Church's.
-
J jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
J jeppe@uddannelse.social shared this topic
